Abstract
Cheverud et al. (1985) apply the important and relatively new methodology of spatial autocorrelation to the quantification of phylogenetic constraints on adaptation and illustrate the use of these methods in an allometric study of sexual dimorphism in body size among extant nonhuman primates. Though of potentially broad applicability, the technique was completely overlooked in a recent review of methods to control for the effects of common descent in comparative studies (Bell, 1989). Their approach therefore deserves a wider recognition. However, their specific conclusion, that phytogeny is the primary determinant of patterns of sexual dimorphism among primates, has been uncritically accepted. We present four main methodological problems with their approach that should temper the interpretation of their analysis: biased phylogenetic relatedness scores, biased sample selection, size dependence in sex dimorphism measurement, and deficiencies in selection of a structural path model. We conclude that, even in terms of the analysis by Cheverud and co-workers (1985), phylogenetic inertia is not the primary reason for body size dimorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atchley, W., Gaskins, C., and Anderson, D. (1976). Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results.Syst. Zool. 25: 137–148.
Austad, S. N. (1987). Review of Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.),Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution. Science 236: 470.
Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. (1978).Outliers In Statistical Data, Wiley, New York.
Bell, G. (1989). A comparative method.Am. Nat. 133: 553–571.
Bell, R. H. V. (1969). The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In Watson, A. (ed.),Animal Resources in Relation to their Food Resources, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 11–128.
Bernstein, I. S., and Gordon, T. P. (1980). Mixed taxa introductions, hybrids, and macaque systematics. In Lindburg, D.G. (ed.),The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 125–147.
Birnbaum, I. (1981).An Introduction to Causal Analysis in Sociology, Macmillan, London.
Blalock, H. M. (1964).Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Research, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
Brockelman, W. Y., and Gittins, S. P. (1984). Natural hybridization in theHylobates lar species group: Implications for speciation in gibbons. In Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W. Y., and Creel, N. (eds.),The Lesser Apes, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 291–297.
Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., and Leutenegger, W. (1985). A quantitative model of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: Sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates.Evolution 39: 1335–1351.
Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., and Leutenegger, W. (1986). A phylogenetic autocorrelation analysis of sexual dimorphism in primatesAm. Anthropol. 88: 916–922.
Chiarelli, B. (1973). Checklist of catarrhine primate hybrids.J. Hum. Evol. 4: 301–305.
Cliff, A. D., and Ord, J. K. (1981).Spatial Autocorrelation, Pion, London.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. (1977a). Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool. 183: 1–39.
Clutton-Brock, T., and Harvey, P. (1977b). Species differences in feeding and ranging behavior in primates. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.),Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behavior in Lemurs, Monkeys, and Apes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 557–584.
Clutton-Brock, T., and Harvey, P. (1978). Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies.Nature (273): 191–195.
Clutton-Brock, T., and Harvey, P. (1980). Primates, brains and ecology.J. Ecol. 190: 309–323.
Clutton-Brock, T., Harvey, P., and Rudder, P. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio, and body weight in primates.Nature 269: 797–800.
Corruccini, R. S. (1975). Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: Some considerations.J. Hum. Evol. 4: 1–19.
d’Agostino, R. B., and Tietjen, G. L. (1973). Approaches to the null distribution of b1.Biometrika 60: 169–173.
Dow, M., Burton, M., and White, D. (1982). Network autocorrelation: A simulation study of a foundational problem in regression and survey research.soci. Networks 4: 169–200.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981).Applied Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Duncan, O. D. (1970). Partials, partitions, and paths. In Borgatta, E. F., and Bohrnstedt, G. W. (eds.),Sociological Methodology, 1970, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 38–47.
Duncan, O. D. (1975).Introduction to Structural Equation Models, Academic Press, New York.
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method,Am. Nat. (125): 1–15.
Gaulin, S. J. C. (1979). A Jarman-Bell model of primate feeding niches.Hum. Ecol. 7: 1–20.
Gaulin, S. J. C., and Sailer, L. D. (1984). Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: The relative impact of allometry and sexual selection.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 515–535.
Gaulin, S. J. C., and Sailer, L. D. (1985). Are females the ecological sex?Am. Anthropol. 87: 111–119.
Goodman, M., Romero-Herrera, A. E., Dene, H., Czelusniak, J., and Tashian, R.E. (1982). Amino acid sequence evidence on the phylogeny of primates and other eutherians. In Goodman, M. (ed.)Macromolecular Sequences in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 115–191.
Gould, S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny.Biol. Rev. 41: 587–640.
Groves, C. P. (1984). A new look at the taxonomy and phylogeny of the gibbons. In Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W. Y., and Creel, N. (eds.),The Lesser Apes, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 542–561.
Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1978). Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth.J. Zool. 186: 475–485.
Jarman, P. J. (1974). The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology.Behavior 48: 215–267.
Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. (1972).Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York.
Joysey, K. A. (1981). Molecular evolution and vertebrate phylogeny in perspective.Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 46: 189–218.
Jungers, W. L., and Sussman, R. L. (1984). Body size and skeletal allometry in African apes. In Sussman, R. L. (ed.),The Pygmy Chimpanzee, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131–177.
Kendall, M. G., and Buckland, W. R. (1982).A Dictionary of Statistical Terms, 4th ed., Longman, New York.
Kohne, D. E. (1975). DNA evolution data and its relevance to mammalian phylogeny. In Luckett, W. P., and Szalay, F. S. (eds.),Phylogeny of the Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 249–261.
Kruskal, W. (1987). Relative importance by averaging over orderings.Am. Stat. 41: 6–10.
Lernould, J.-M. (1988). Classification and geographical distribution of guenons: A review. In Gautier-Hion, A., Bourliere, F., Gautier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. (eds.),A Primate Radiation, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 54–78.
Leutenegger, W. (1980). Monogamy in callitrichids: A consequence of phyletic dwarfism?Int. J. Primatol. 1: 95–98.
Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. (1982). Correlates of sexual dimorphism in Primates: Ecological and size variables.Int. J. Primatol. 3:387–402.
Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. M. (1985). Sexual dimorphism in primates: The effects of size. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 33–50.
Li, C. C. (1975).Path Analysis, Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, Calif.
Marsaglia, G. (1965). Ratios of normal variables and ratios of sums of uniform variables.J. Am. Stat. Soc. 60: 193–204.
Moller, A. P. (1988). Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm competition in primates.J. Hum. Evol. 17: 479–488.
Mosimann, J. E., and James, F. C. (1979). New statistical methods for allometry with application to Florida red-winged blackbirds.Evolution 33: 444–459.
Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J. W. (1977).Data Analysis and Regression, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Nagel, U. (1973). A comparison of anubis baboons, hamadryas baboons and their hybrids at a species border in Ethiopia.Folia Primatol. 19: 104–165.
Pagel, M. D., and Harvey, P. H. (1988). Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data.Q. Rev. Biol. 63: 413–440.
Pearson, K. (1897). On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 60: 489–498.
Ridley, M. (1983).The Explanation of Organic Diversity, Oxford Univesity Press, New York.
Ripley, S. (1984). Enviromental grain, niche diversification and feeding behavior. In Chivers, D. J., Wood, B. A., and Bilsborough, A. (eds.),Food Acquisition and Processing In Primates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 33–72.
Rodman, P. S., and Mitani, J. C. (1987). Orangutans: Sexual dimorphism in a solitary species. In Smuts, B., Wrangham, R., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., and Struhsaker, T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman, New York.
Yule, G. U. (1910). On the interpretation of correlations between indices or ratios.J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 73: 645–647.
Yule, G. U., and Kendall, M. G. (1940).An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, 12th ed., Charles Griffin, London.
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation.J. Agr. Res. 20: 557–585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ely, J., Kurland, J.A. Spatial autocorrelation, phylogenetic constraints, and the causes of sexual dimorphism in primates. Int J Primatol 10, 151–171 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735198
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735198