Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative ambiguities: NGOs’ use of interactive technology in Eastern Europe

  • Articles
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the co-evolution of interactive technology and non-governmental organizations in Eastern Europe. It addresses, on the one side, the emergence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as actors who exhibit new organizational topographies and, on the other side, the emergence of the Internet and related interactive technologies that not only provide a new medium of representation in a virtual public sphere but also make possible fundamental changes in the character of organization. We explore how organizations of civil society can be a source of organizational and technological innovation necessary for their societies’ ongoing adaptability in a rapidly changing global economy. As such, NGOs can use new technologies within and beyond their existing roles as safety nets (to mitigate the new social problems of emerging market economies) and as safety valves (to give voice to social groups underrepresented in the newly competitive polities) to function as social entrepreneurs exploring new organizational forms as ongoing sources of innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agh, Attila. 1998.Emerging Democracies in East Centrla Europe and the Balkans. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, Helmut, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor. 2001.Global Civil Society Yearbook 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, Helmut and Wolfgang Seibel. 1998. “The Nonprofit Sector and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Analysis of East Germany, Poland and Hungary.” Pp. 177–192 inPrivate Action and the Public Good, eds. Walter Powell and Elisabeth Clemens. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, James. 2000.The Collaboration Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Jonathan and Balazs Vedres. In progress. Representation among NGO Web sites in Eastern Europe. A Different Kind of Digital Divide. Center on Organizational Innovation, Columbia University, New York.

  • Bendell, Jem 2000.Term for Endearment: Business, NGOs and Sustainable Development. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. 1997.Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski, Pablo. 2001. Affording Flexibility: Transforming Information Practices in Online Newspapers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Burt, Ronald. 1992.Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, F. 1997.The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central and Eastern European Networking Association. 2000. Web sitehttp://www.ceenet.org (accessed November 2000).

  • Century, Michael. 1999. “Cultural Laboratories.” Pp. 20–22 inNew Media Culture in Europe: Art, Research, Innovation, Participation, Public Domain, Learning, Education, Policy, eds. Frank Boyd, Cathy Brickwood, Andreas Broeckmann et al. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij de Balie and the Virtual Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi. 1999. “Making (It) Public.”Constellations 6, 2: 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, and Russell W. Neumann. 2001. “Social Implications of the Internet.”Annual Review of Sociology 27: 307–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Michael and David Hulme. 1996.Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post Cold War World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekiert, Grzegorz and Jan Kubik. 1999.Rebellious Civil Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Adele. 1999. “A Model for a New Media Laboratory at 19’47’—Central Eastern Europe: C3 Centre for Culture & Communication, Budapest.” Pp. 35–37 inNew Media Culture in Europe, eds. Boyd, Brickwood, Broeckmann et al.

  • Fazekas, Erzsebet. n.d. Integrating the Civic Sector: Constructing Virtual NGO Spaces in Hungary and Poland. Manuscript, Center on Organization Innovation, Columbia University, New York.

  • Feldman, Shelley. 1997. “NGOs and Civil Society: (Un)stated Contradictions.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 554: 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Claude S. 1992.America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Monique and David Stark. 2002 (forthcoming). “Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New Media Projects.”Environment and Planning A.

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Andrew T. 1999 “Nonprofits and Democratic Development: Lessons from the Czech Republic.”Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 10, 3: 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurstein, Michael. 2000.Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink, Cees J. 1997.New Information and Communication Technologies, Social Development and Cultural Change. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, C. M. and Elizabeth Courtney Dunn, eds. 1996.Civil Society: Challenging Western Models. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Craig, ed. 1999.Art and Innovation: The Xerox PARC Artist-in-Resisdence Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudock, Ann. 1999NGOs and Civil Society: Democracy by Proxy? Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, David and Michael Edwards. 1997.NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? New York: St. Martin’s Press and Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, Chris. 1996.Creating Collaborative Advantage. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridis, Demetrius S., ed. 2000.Social Justice and the Welfare State in Central and Eastern Europe: The Impact of Privatization. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Russel L. 2000. “The Effect of Technological Innovation on Organizational Structure: Two Case Studies of the Effects of the Introduction of a New Technology on Informal Organizational Structures.”Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14: 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert et al. 1998. “Social Impact of the Internet: What Does it Mean?”Communications of the ACM 41, 12: 21–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Richard, Sara Kiesler, Bonka Boneva et al. 2002 (forthcoming). “Internet Paradox Revisited.”Journal of Social Issues 58, 1 (Spring).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuti, Eva. 2001. “Nonprofit Organizations as Social Players in the Period of Transition: Roles and Challenges.” InSzelenyi 60: A Festschrift in Honor of Ivan Szelenyi, eds. Eva Fodor and Janos Ladanyi.http://hi.rutgers.edu/szelenyi60/kuti.html (accessed on 1/23/01).

  • —. 1996.The Nonprofit Sector in Hungary. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcon, Jean-Paul. 1998.Entrepreneurship and Economic Transition in Central Europe. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne, Marie. 1999.The Economics of Transition: From Socialist Economy to Market Economy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1988.The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1988. “NGOs, Management, and the Process of Change—New Models or Reinventing the Wheel?”Appropriate Technology 25.

  • Lindenberg, Marc and Coralie Bryant. 2001.Going Global. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald and Judith Wajcman, eds. 1985.The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got its Hum. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovitch, Lev. 1999. “Digital Constructivism: What is European Software? An Exchange with Lev Manovich,” interview by Geert Lovink. Pp. 42–45 inNew Media Culture in Europe, eds. Frank Boyd, Cathy Brickwood, Andreas Broeckmann et al. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij de Balie and the Virtual Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuello, Chaime. 1998. “Internet Yes, but People First: Popular Server of Electronic Information.” Zaragoza University, Spain http://www.unizar.es/psicosocio/chaime.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, John. 2001 “Contested Space: The Internet and Global Civil Society.” Pp. 147–168 inGlobal Civil Society Yearbook 2001, eds. Helmut Anheier, Marlies Glasius, and Mary Kaldor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, Geoffrey ed. 1996.The Future of the Book. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, Siobhan and Stephen R. Barley. 1999 “Do Digital Telecomunications Affect Work and Organization? The State of Our Knowledge.”Research in Organizational Behavior 21: 125–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Institute (OSI). 1993.Annual Report. New York: Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2000.Internet Access Price Comparison. http://www/oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/cm/

  • Orlikowski, Wanda. 1995. “Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use.”Organization Science 6: 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations.”Organization Science 3, 3: 398–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, Wanda and C. S. Iacono. 1999. “The Truth is not Out There: An Enacted View of the ‘Digital Economy’.” Pp. 352–380 inUnderstanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research, eds. E. Brynjolfsson and B. Kahin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Stephen P 1998.Voluntary Organization and Innovation in Public Services. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattinson, Bill, Pierre Montagnier, and Laurent Moussiegt. 2000.Measuring the ICT Sector. OECD.http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/prod/measuring_ict.pdf

  • Peizer, Jonathan. 2000. “Sustainable Development in the Digital Age.”http://www.medianchannel.org/views/oped/values3.shtml (accessed October 15, 2000). New York: Media Channel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, James. 1999. “NGOs: In the Services of Imperialism.”Journal of Contemporary Asia 29, 4: 429–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. and Mark R. Kramer. 1999. “Social Enterprise—Philanthropy’s New Agenda: Creating Value.”Harvard Business Review 77: 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potucek, Martin. 2000. “The Uneasy Birth of Czech Civil Society.”Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 11, 2: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, Lester M. et al. 2001.Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Baltimore, MD: Center for Civil Society Studies Publications, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, Lester M. and Helmurt K. Anheier. 1997.Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-national Analysis. New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, Douglas. 1996.New Community Networks: Wired for Change. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Daniel and Jenny Yancey 1992.The Rebirth of Civil Society: The Development of the Nonprofit Sector in East Central Europe and the Role of Western Assistance. New York: Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slayton, Joel. 1999. “Re-purpose of Information: Art as Network.”Switch: Social Networks 4, 2. http://switch.sjsu.edu/web/v4n2/joel/index.html

  • Spinosa, Charles, Fernando Flores, and Hubert L. Dreyfus. 1997.Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler. 1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.”Management Science 32: 1492–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David. 1996. “Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism.”American Journal of Sociology 101: 993–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David. 2000. For a Sociology of Worth. Keynote address for the European Association for Evolutionary Economics, Berlin, October.

  • —. 2001. “Ambiguous Assets for Uncertain Environments: Heterarchy in Postsocialist Firms.” Pp. 69–104 inThe Twenty-First-Century Firm: Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective, ed. Paul DiMaggio. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David and Laszlo Bruszt. 1998.Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Lucy. 1987.Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, John P. and Shaul Gabbay. 1997. Social Networks in the Age of the Internet: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Toronto.

  • Wagner, Alexandra. 2001. Internet Use among Slovak NGOs. Manuscript. Center on Organizational Innovation, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin, Craig. 2001.Reshaping World Politics: NGOs, the Internet and Global Civil Society, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Charles S. 1997. “Citizen Participation and the Internet: Prospects for Civic Deliberation in the Information Age.”Social Studies 88, 1: 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, Adam. 1999.Incomplete Revolutions: The Successes and Failures of Capitalist Transition Strategies in Post-Communist Economies. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jonathan Bach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Jonathan Bach is a postdoctoral research scholar at the Center for Organizational Innovation at the Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University. He is the author ofBetween Sovereignty and Integration: German Foreign Policy and National Identity after 1989.

David Stark is Arnold A. Saltzman Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Columbia University and an external faculty member at the Santa Fe Institute. His current research examines the co-evolution of collaborative organization and interactive technologies in various settings, including new media startups in Manhattan and trading rooms on Wall Street, as well as NGOs in Eastern Europe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bach, J., Stark, D. Innovative ambiguities: NGOs’ use of interactive technology in Eastern Europe. St Comp Int Dev 37, 3–23 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686259

Search

Navigation