Skip to main content
Log in

A review of the gobioid fish genusgobioides

  • Published:
Ichthyological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The gobioid genusGobioides Lacepède, 1800 shares with the amblyopine gobies (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae) an eel-like, elongate body with a continuous dorsal fin and an affinity for shallow water, muddy bottom habitats. Due to similarities in external morphology and habitat requirements, some workers consideredGobioides allied with amblyopine gobies. Others, however, dispute a close relationship betweenGobioides and the Amblyopinae; morphological and ecological similarities are considered to be homoplasious. Results of this study concur with placingGobioides separate from amblyopine gobies and within the gobiid subfamily Gobionellinae.Gobioides is easily distinguished from the Amblyopinae by its larger eyes (small inGobioides vs. inconspicuous in the Amblyopinae), fewer dorsal and anal-fin rays (14–20 vs. 27–48), and different fin element to vertebra ratios (1∶1 vs. 2∶1).Gobioides reaches lengths of 500 mm SL or greater whereas amblyopines rarely exceed 300 mm SL.Gobioides comprises five species (G. africanus, G. broussoneti, G. grahamae, G. peruanus, andG. sagitta). Although these gobies occupy habitats with similar conditions,Gobioides and amblyopines are nowhere sympatric.Gobioides occurs in tropical and subtropical coastal waters of the eastern and western Atlantic as well as the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean. In the eastern Atlantic.Gobioides is known from Senegal to Zaire. In the western Atlantic.Gobioides is reported from South Carolina to southern Brazil. In the eastern Pacific,Gobioides is known from Mexico to Peru.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen, G. R. and D. R. Robertson. 1994. Fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. 332 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauchot, M. L., M. Desoutter, D. F. Hoese and H. K. Larson. 1991. Catalogue critique des types de Poissons du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Paris, 4e ser. 13, section A, 1–2, supplement: 1–82.

  • Bean, T. H. and B. A. Bean. 1894. Description ofGobioides broussoneti, a fish new to North America, from the Gulf of Mexico. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 17: 631–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsong, R. S., E. O. Murdy and F. L. Pezold. 1988. A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobioid fishes with comments on gobioid relationships. Bull. Mar. Sci., 42: 174–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleeker, P. 1874. Esquisse d'un systéme naturel desGobioides. Arch. Neerl. Sci. Nat., 9: 289–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch M. E. and J. G. Schneider. 1801. M. E. Blochii, Systema Ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum. Post obitum auctoris opus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Jo. Gottlob Schneider, Saxo. Berolini. Sumtibus Austoris Impressum et Bibliopolio Sanderiano Commissum. 584 pp., 110 pls.

  • Boulenger, G. A. 1909. Descriptions of three new fishes from Portuguese Guinea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, 4: 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajiga, S. R. R. 1993. Macrofauna de la Laguna Barra de Navidad, Jalisco. Pages 499–508in S. I Salazar-Vallejo and N. E. Gonzalez, eds. Biodiversidad Marina y Costera de México. Com. Nal. Biodiversidad y CIQRO, México, 865 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. W. 1936. New and noteworthy fishes. The Templeton Crocker Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences, 1932. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. ser. 4, 21: 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. E. 1969. Studies on the gobies of Mississippi Sound and adjacent Waters II. An illustrated key to the gobioid fishes. Publications of the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Museum I. 60 pp.

  • Evermann, B. W. and L. Radcliffe. 1917. The fishes of the west coast of Peru and the Titicaca basin. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., (95): i-xi+1–166, pls. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giltay, L. 1935. Note sur quelques poissons marins du Congo Belge. Bull. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg., 11, 36: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. E. 1854. Catalogue of fish collected and described by Laurence Theodore Gronow, now in the British Museum. London. I-vii+196 pp.

  • Günther, A. C. L. G. 1861. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum. III. xxv+586+x. pp

  • Günther, A. C. L. G. 1862. Descriptions of new species of reptiles and fishes in the collection of the British Museum. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. 2: 188–194, pls. 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, A. C. L. G. 1864. Report of a collection of fishes made by Messrs. Dow, Godman, and Salvin in Guatemala. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. 1: 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, I. J. 1989. Specialization of the gobioid palatopterygoquadrate complex and its relevance to gobioid systematics. J. Nat. Hist., 23: 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, I. J. and P. J. Miller, 1992. Gobiidae. Pages 798–821in C. Lévêque, D. Paugy and G. Teugels. Faune des poissons d'eaux douces et saumâtres d'Afrique de l'Ouest, Tome 2. Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale. Tervuren, Belgique.

  • Hildebrand, S. F. 1946. A descriptive catalog of the shore fishes of Peru. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 189: i-xi+1–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, D. F. 1984. Gobioidei: Relationships. Pages 588–591in H. G. Moser, W. J. Richards, D. M. Cohen, M. P. Fahay, A. W. Kendall, Jr. and S. L. Richardson, eds. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. Spec. Publ. I.

  • Hora, S. L. 1924. Notes on fishes in the Indian Museum. VI. On a new genus of gobioid fishes (subfamily Trypaucheninae) with notes on related forms. Rec. Indian Mus., 26 (pt 2): 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D. S. 1923 A classification of fishes including families and genera as far as known. Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci., 3: 77–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D. S. and C. H. Eigenmann. 1887. A review of the Gobiidae of North America. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 9: 477–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumans, F. P. 1931. Preliminary revision of the genera of the gobioid fishes with united ventral fins. Proefschrift, Lisee, 174 pp.

  • Lacepède, B. G. E. 1800. Histoire naturelle des poissons. v., 2:i–lxiv+1–632, pl. 1–20.

  • Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina Biological survey. x+854 pp.

  • Maugé, A. L. 1986. Gobiidae. Pages 358–388in J. Daget et al., eds. Check-list of the freshwater fishes of Africa. Catalogue des Poissons d'eau douce d'Afrique. ISNB, MRAC, ORSTOM. Vol. 2.

  • Menezes, N. A. and J. L. Figueiredo. 1985. Manual de Peixes Marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. V-Teleostei (4). Museu de Zoologica. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. 105 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. J. 1973. The osteology and adaptive features ofRhyacichthys aspro (Teleostei: Gobioidei) and the classification of gobioid fishes. J. Zool., London, 171: 397–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S. 1984. Fishes of the world. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York xv+523 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the world. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, xvii+600 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. R. 1966. A draft synopsis of the orders, families and genera of recent fishes and fish-like vertebrates. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London, 649 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shaughnessy, A. W. E., 1875. Descriptions of new species of Gobiidae in the collection of the British Museum. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, 15: 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. 1952. Notes on the fishes of the genusGobioides, with description of a new species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, 5: 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. and A. Wheeler. 1955. Further notes on the fishes of the genusGobioides. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, 8: 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezold, F. 1993. Evidence for a monophyletic Gobiinae. Copeia, 1993: 634–643.

  • Poey, F. 1860. Memorias sobra la historia natural de la Isla de Cuba, acompañadas de sumarios latinos y extractors en Francés. 2: 97–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puyo, J. 1957. Deux nouveaux poissons du Sènégal. Bulletin de la Societe d'Histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 57: 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisés. Palerme: 1–224. (Fishes on pp. 79–94.)

  • Robins, C. R., R. M. Bailey, C. E. Bond, J. R. Brooker, E. A. Lachner, R. N. Lea and W. B. Scott. 1980. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Am. Fish. Soc., Spec. Publ. 12. 174 pp.

  • Sauvage, H. E. 1880. Description desGobioides nouveaux ou peu connus de la collection du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle. Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris (Ser. 7) v. 4: 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindachner, F. 1880. Fisch-Fauna des Cauca & Flüsse bei Guayaquil. Denksehr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 42: 60–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swainson, W. 1839. Natural history and classification of fishes. Amphibians, and Reptiles. Volume II. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans and John Taylor, London, 452 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1913. Die Fische der Siboga-Expedition, E. J. Brill, Leiden, xiii+710 pp., 1–12 pls.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Murdy, E.O. A review of the gobioid fish genusgobioides . Ichthyological Research 45, 121–133 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678554

Key words

Navigation