Abstract
Consent forms are often long and incomprehensible. The authors studied 88 consecutive research consent forms generated at the Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center, evaluating the reading levels of the forms using the Fry Readability Scale and recording the numbers of lines of text. The mean grade reading level required for comprehension was 13.4 years of schooling. Twenty-two percent of all text passages scored were at the postgraduate level of readability. This difficult readability level has not improved since the forms were last tested in 1982. The mean length of the forms was 84.6 lines. Also found was a 58% increase in the length of forms since 1982, a factor known to impair comprehension. These factors, poor readability and increasing length, may make many consent forms incomprehensible. It is recommended that investigators be brief, use plain English, and write consent forms at appropriate reading levels, and receive training on how to obtain valid consent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taub HA. Comprehension of informed consent for research: issues and directions for future study. Denver, CO: IRB. 1986;8:7–10.
Epstein LC, Lasagna L. Obtaining informed consent. Arch Intern Med. 1969;123:682.
Grundner TM. On the readability of surgical consent forms. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:900–2.
Fry EB. The readability graph validated at primary levels. Read Teach. 1969;22:534–8.
Baker MT, Taub HA. Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. JAMA. 1983;250:2646.
Flesch R. How to write plain English. Hagerstown, MD: Harper and Row, 1979.
Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Informed consent—why are its goals imperfectly realized? N Engl J Med. 1980;302:896–900.
Riecken HW, Ravich R. Informed consent to biomedical research in Veterans Administration hospitals. JAMA. 1982;248:344–8.
Taub HA, Kline GE, Baker MT. The elderly and informed consent: effects of vocabulary level and corrected feedback. Exp Aging Res. 1981;7:137–45.
Garnham JC. Some observations on informed consent in nontherapeutic research. J Med Ethics. 1975;1:138–45.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Institutional review boards: report and recommendations. DHEW Publication No. (06) 78-0008, Appendix, DHEW Publication No. (05) 78-0009, Washington, DC, 1978.
Office of Information Management and Statistics, Veterans Administration. State profiles of the veteran population: statistical portraits from the 1980 census. Office of Information Management and Statistics, Veterans Administration, 1984.
Roth LH, Lidz CW, Meisel A, Soloff PH, et al. Competency to decide about treatment or research: an overview of some empirical data. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5:29–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by the Milbank Memorial Fund Clinical Epidemiology Fellowship (AVP).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loverde, M.E., Prochazka, A.V. & Byyny, R.L. Research consent forms. J Gen Intern Med 4, 410–412 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599693
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599693