Conclusion
Academic development in GIM is a challenging and difficult process. Mentoring may be an essential ingredient to that process. It is important to structure programs such that these relationships can develop effectively. In doing so, GIM divisions must deal with problems raised by having young faculty with diverse research interests. By supporting good mentoring relationships, GIM divisions may help their research and tranining programs to flourish.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hulley SB, Cummings SR. Designing clinical research. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1988.
Petersdorf RG. General internal medicine: fad or future? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:527–32.
Homer The Odyssey. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1969.
Levinson DJ. The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Ballantine Books, 1978.
Roche GR. Much ado about mentors. Harvard Bus Rev. 1979;1:14–31.
Riley S, Wrench D. Mentoring among women lawyers. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1985;15:375–86.
Zuckerman H. Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. Am Sociol Rev. 1967;37:391–403.
Strange KC, Hekelman FP. Mentoring needs and family medicine faculty. Fam Med. 1990;22:183–5.
Rogers JC, Holloway RL, Miller SM. Academic mentoring and family medicine’s research productivity. Fam Med. 1990;22:186–9.
Applegate WB. Career development in academic medicine. Am J Med. 1990;88:263–7.
Ochberg RL, Barton GM, West AN. Women physicians and their mentors. J Am Med Wom Assoc. 1989;44:123–6.
Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and practice. Educ Res. 1990;19:17–21.
Hunt DM, Michael C. Mentorship: a career training and development tool. Acad Manage Rev. 1983;8:475–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schapira, M.M., Kalet, A., Schwartz, M.D. et al. Mentorship in general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med 7, 248–251 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598026
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598026