Skip to main content
Log in

Foraging behavior of individual workers and foraging dynamics of colonies of three Sumatran stingless bees

  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Summary

The foraging behavior of three stingless bees,Trigona (Tetragonula) minangkabau, T. (Trigonella) moorei andT. (Heterotrigona) itama, was studied to describe patterns of resource harvest in disturbed forest areas in Sumatra, Indonesia.

  1. 1.

    Average daily total number of foraging flights per colony was 1200 inT. minangkabau, 2400 inT. moorei and 7000 inT. itama and it was proportional to colony population size. Foragers collecting nectar, pollen or plant resin were respectively 70–80%, 10–20% and <10% in the three species. Pollen was collected most in the morning. Nectar collection peaked in midday inT. itama but continued almost evenly until dusk inT. minangkabau andT. moorei. Resin was collected evenly throughout day.

  2. 2.

    In all the three species the volume of a nectar load carried by a returning forager did not decrease until 1600, followed by slight decline. In the morning the sugar concentration of nectar was almost constantly 30%, and in the afternoon its maximum value reached 60% although some remained 30%. As a result, the mean sugar weight in a nectar load gradually increased until dusk.

  3. 3.

    InT. minangkabau, resin was collected by specialized foragers. Nectar foragers switched to collect pollen and vice versa. There were two types of foraging: “exploitatory” flights, the repitition of short, rather constant flights bringing back full resource loads, and “exploratory” flights, prolonged flight and/or reduction in amount of resources carried. Exploitatory flights followed the exploratory flights which led to discovery of rich sources. Mean duration of exploitatory flights was 7 min during nectar collection, 12 min for pollen and 23 min for resin. Sites of exploited flowers were estimated to be 84–434 m distant from the nest site. Mean duration of flights for nectar collection was 13 min in the morning and 6 min in the late afternoon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Corbet, S. A. (1978) Bees and the nectar ofEchium vulgare. 21–30. In:A. J. Richards (ed)The pollination of flowers by insects. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S. A., D. M. Unwin andO. E. Prŷs-Jones (1979a) Humidity, nectar and insect visits to flowers, with special reference toCrataegus, Tilia andEchium.Ecol. Entomol. 4: 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S. A., P. G. Willmer, J. W. L. Beament, D. M. Unwin andO. E. Prŷs-Jones (1979b) Postsecretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar.Plant Cell and Environment 2: 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S. A. andP. G. Willmer (1981) The nectar ofJusticia andColumnea: Composition and concentration in a humid tropical climate.Oecologia 51: 412–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, K. von. (1967)The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1976) Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: Bumblebees.Ecology 57: 874–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1979)Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S. P. andL. K. Johnson (1977) Competition and nest spacing in a tropical stingless bee community.Ecology 58: 949–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S. P. andL. K. Johnson (1978) Comparative foraging behavior of six stingless bee species exploiting a standardized resource.Ecology 59: 1123–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, T., Sh. F. Sakagami, S. Salmah andS. Yamane (1984) The process of colony multiplication in the Sumatran stingless beeTrigona (Tetragonula) laeviceps (1).Biotropica 16: 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K. andS. P. Hubbell (1974) Aggression and competition among sitngless bees: Field studies.Ecology 55: 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. K. andS. P. Hubbell (1975) Contrasting foraging strategies and coexistence of two bee species on a single resource.Ecology 56: 1398–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeniger, N. andG. Vorwohl (1979) Competition for food among four sympatric species of Apini in Sri Lanka.J. Apic. Res. 18: 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. E. andH. Esch (1965) Comunicação entre as abelhas sociais brasileiras e sua contribução para o entendimento da sua evolução.Ciencia. e. Cult. (São Paulo) 17: 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, M. andW. E. Kerr (1958) Die gegenseitige Verstanding bei den stachellosen Bienen.Zeitschr. vergl. Physiol. 41: 405–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, M. andW. E. Kerr (1960) Communication between the workers of stingless bees.Bee World 41: 29–41, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maa, T. (1953) An inquiry into the systematics of the tribus Apidini or honeybees (Hym.)Treubia 21: 525–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D. (1974)The social behavior of the bees: A comparative study. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1978) Competitive interactions between neotropical pollinators and Africanized honey bees.Science 201: 1030–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1979) Africanized honey bees, stingless bees, and the structure of tropical plant-pollinator communities.Md. Agric. Exp. Sta. Spec. Misc. Publ. 1: 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1980) Foraging behavior of competing Africanized honeybees and stingless bees.Ecology 61: 836–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1981) Comparative foraging behavior ofApis mellifera andTrigona corvina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) onBaltimora recta (Compositae).Revista de Biologia Tropical 29: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. (1982) Ecological impact of Africanized honeybees on native neotropical pollinators. In:P. Jaisson (ed)Social insects in the tropics, vol. 1. Univ. Paris-Nord.

  • Roubik, D. W. andM. Aluja (1983) Flight ranges of foragingMelipona andTrigona in a tropical forest.J. Kans. Ent. Soc. 56: 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. andS. L. Buchmann (1984) Nectar selection byMelipona andApis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest.Oecologia 61: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, Sh. F., T. Matsumura andK. Ito (1982)Apis laboriosa in Himalaya, the little known world largest honeybee (Hymenoptera, Apidae).Insecta Matsumurana New Series 19: 47–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, Sh. F. (1982) Stingless bees. 361–423. In:H. R. Hermann (ed)Social insects. vol III. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, Sh. F., T. Inoue, S. Yamane andS. Salmah (1983) Nest architecture and colony composition of the Sumatran stingless beeTrigona (Tetragonula) laeviceps (1).Kontyû 51: 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami, Sh. F. andT. Inoue (1985) Taxonomic notes on three bicolorousTetragonula stingless bees in southeast Asia.Kontyû 53: 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, P. K. andT. D. Seeley (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest.Ecology 63: 1790–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution to the ecological and bioeconomical studies of the stingless bees. 4.

Contribution No. 17 of Sumatra Nature Study (Entomology).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, T., Salmah, S., Abbas, I. et al. Foraging behavior of individual workers and foraging dynamics of colonies of three Sumatran stingless bees. Res Popul Ecol 27, 373–392 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515474

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515474

Keywords

Navigation