Skip to main content
Log in

Preface

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Boutilier, C. & Becher, V. (1995) Abduction as belief revision,Artificial Intelligence, 77, pp. 43–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bylander, T., Allemang, D., Tanner, M.C. & Josephson, J.R. (1991) The computational complexity of abduction,Artificial Intelligence, 49, pp. 25–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, D.L., Nersessian, N.J. & Catrambone, R. (2002) Perceptual simulation in analogical problem solving, in L. Magnani & N.J. Nersessian (Eds),Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 167–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K.J. & Thagard, P. (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction,Cognitive Science, 13, pp. 295–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1992) Abductive reasoning: philosophical and educational perspectives in medicine, in D.A. Evans & V.L. Patel (Eds),Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice (Berlin, Springer), pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1999a) Model-based creative abduction, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 219–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (1999b) Inconsistencies and creative abduction in science, inAI and scientific creativity. Proceedings of the Aisb '99 symposium on scientific creativity Edinburgh, Edinburgh College of Art and Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh), pp. 1–8.

  • Magnani, L. (2001)Abduction, reason, and science. Processes of discovery and explanation (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2002) Epistemic mediators and model-based discovery in science, in L. Magnani & N.J. Nersessian (Eds),Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 305–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1984)Faraday to Einstein: Constructing meaning in scientific theories (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1992) How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science, in R. Giere (Ed.),Cognitive models of science, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science 15 (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press), pp. 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1999) Model-based reasoning in conceptual change, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., Holyoak, K.J., Nelson, G. & Gochfeld, D. (1990) Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction,Artificial Intelligence, 46, pp. 259–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. & Croft (1999) Scientific discovery and technological innovation: ulcers, dinosaur extinction, and the programming language Java, in L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers), pp. 125–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. Preface. Mind & Society 3, 3–7 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511862

Navigation