Skip to main content
Log in

A new interferomemtric method of two-dimensional stress analysis

The use of interferometry in obtaining both the sum and difference of principal stresses simultaneously in two-dimensional stress distribution is discussed by the authors

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interformetric method of obtaining the two principal stresses separately in two-dimensional stress distribution is described. An analytical interpretation is given of the relation between the stress-strain state of a transparent elastic plate and the light intensity of the plate observed through the Mach-Zehnder interferometer. The isopachic fringes which give the distribution of the sum of the principal stressesσ 1 +σ 2 are modulated by simultaneous appearance of the isochromatic fringes which related to the distribution of the difference of principal stressesσ 1 -σ 2. Accordingly, a single pattern obtained by this method provides sufficient information for evaluating the two principal stresses separately.

As examples, a few two-dimensional cases are treated and some practical procedures for carrying out the experiment are described. The feasibility of this method for the general three-diensions frozen-stress model is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Favre, H., “Surune nouvelle méthode optique de détermination des tensions intérieures,”Rev. optique, 8, 193–213, 241–261, 289–307 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fabry, C., “Sur une nouvelle méthode pour l’étude expérimentale des tensions élasltique,”Compt. rend., 190, 457–460 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brahtz, J. H. A. andSoehrens J.E., Direct Optical Measurements of Individual Principal Stresses,”Jnl. Appl. Phys., 10, 242–247 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frocht, M. M., “Isopachic Stress Patterns,”Jnl. Appl. Phys., 10, 248–257 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sinclair, D. and Bucky, P. B., “Photoelasticity and Its Application to Mine-Pillar and Tunnel Problems,” Am. Inst. Mining and Met. Eng. Techn. Publ. 1140 (1940).

  6. Sinclair, D., “Interferometer Method of Plane Stress Analysis,”Jnl. Opt. Soc. Am.,30,511–513 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Post, D., “A New Photoelastic Inteferometer Suitable for Static and Dynamic Measurements,”Proc. SESA 12, 1, 191–212 (1954).“Photelastic Evaluation of Individual Principal Stresses by Large Field Absolute Retardation Measurements,” Proc. SESA, 13, 2, 119–132 (1956). “Isochromatic Fringe Scharpening and Fringe Multiplication in Photoelasticity,” Proc. SESA. SESA, 12, 2, 143–156 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fawre, H. and Schumann, W., “A Photoelectric-Interferometric Method to Determine Separately the Principal Stress in Two-dimensional States and Possible Applications to Surface and Thermal Stresses,” Photoelasticity, Proc. International Symposium, 1961, Frocht M. M., Ed., Pergamon Press Pub., 3–25, 1963.

  9. Coker, E. G. andFilon, L. N. G., A Treatise on Photo-Elasticity, University Press, Cambridge, 215, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dose, A. andLandwehr, R., “Zur Bestimmung der Isopachen (Lininen gleicher Hauptspannungssumme) in der Spannungsoptik,”Naturwissenschaften, 36, 342–343 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mesmer, G., “The Interference Screen Method for Isopachic Patterns (Moiré Method),”Proc. SESA, 13, 2, 21–26 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pirard, A., “Considerations sur la méthode du moiré en photoélasticité,”Revue Universelle des Mines, 9 série 16, 4, 177–200 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pockels, F., Lehrbuch der Kristalloptik, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig u. Berlin, 33, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramachandran G. N. and Ramaseshan, S., “Crystal Optics,” Handbuch der Physik, Band XXV/1, Springer Verlag, 74, 1961.

  15. Kuske, A., “Das Kunstharz Phenolformaldelhyde in der Spannungsoptik,”Forsch. Geb. Ing-Wes., 9, 139–149 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frocht, M. M., Jnl. Appl. Mech. Rev., 3, 2, 38 (1950).Froncht, M. M. and Guernsey, R., Jr., “A Special Investigation to Develop a General Method for Three-Dimensional Photoelastic Stress Analysis,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Techn. Note 2822 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hiltscher, R., “Polarisationsoptische Untersuchung des räumlichen Spannungeszustandes im konvergenten Licht,”Forsch. Geb. Ing-Wes. 9, 91–103 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jessop, H. T., “A Tilting Stage Method for Three-Dimensional Photoelastic Investigations,”Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 8, 30–32 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nisida, M., Saito, H. A new interferomemtric method of two-dimensional stress analysis. Experimental Mechanics 4, 366–376 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322795

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02322795

Keywords

Navigation