Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a commercial rRNA amplification assay for direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in processed sputum

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A commercial assay (AmplifiedMycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test, Gen Probe) which combines transcription-mediated amplification of target rRNA with amplicon detection by a chemiluminescent DNA probe for the rapid detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum was evaluated. The test was applied to consecutively collected, NALC/NaOH processed sputum sediments from two laboratories (H and L), each serving a different population of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Results were compared to those of fluorochrome staining and culture. A total of 760 specimens obtained from 246 patients were used for the study. The test was positive in 141 of 144 (98 %) specimens that were fluorochrome-positive and culture-positive forMycobacterium tuberculosis. Fifteen of 31 specimens that were fluorochromenegative, culture-positive were also assay-positive. A total of 312 specimens (100 patients) from laboratory H (prevalence = 10 %) and 448 specimens (146 patients) from laboratory L (prevalence = 34 %) were analyzed. Compared to culture, test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were 65 %, 99 %, 94 % and 97 %, respectively, for laboratory H and 93 %, 99 %, 99 % and 97 %, respectively, for laboratory L. If the results were analyzed on the basis of at least one concordant result between the amplification assay and culture in three sputum samples per patient, then the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for identifying infected patients was 70 %, 99 %, 87 % and 97 %, respectively, for laboratory H, and 100 %, 98 %, 96 % and 100 %, respectively, for laboratory L.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huebner RE, Good RC, Tokars JI: Current practices in mycobacteriology: results of a survey of state public health laboratories. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 771–775.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Musial CE, Tice LS, Stockman L, Roberts GD: Identification of mycobacteria from culture by using the Gen-Probe rapid diagnostic system forMycobacterium avium complex andMycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 2120–2123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dewit D, Steyn L, Shoemaker S, Sogin M: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 2437–2441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenach KD, Sifford MD, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. American Reviews of Respiratory Diseases 1990, 144: 1160–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes BA, Hicks KS: Direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens in a clinical laboratory by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1688–1694.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyazaki Y, Hironobu K, Kohro S, Kaku M: Nested polymerase chain reaction for detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2228–2232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierre C, Lecossier D, Boussougant Y, Bocart D, Joly V, Yeni P, Hance AJ: Use of a reamplification protocol improves sensitivity of detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by amplification of DNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 712–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonas V, Alden MJ, Curry JI, Kamisango K, Knott CA, Lankford R, Wolfe JM, Moore DF: Detection and identification ofMycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by amplification of rRNA. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2410–2416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe C, Hirano K, Wada M, Kazumi Y, Takahashi M, Fukasawa Y, Yoshimura T, Miyagi C, Goto S: Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by polymerase chain reaction and Gen-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 3270–3274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kent PT, Kubica GP: Public health mycobacteriology. A guide for the level III laboratory. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, 1985, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarridge JE, Shawar RM, Shinnick TM, Plikaytis BB: Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in a routine mycobacteriology laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 2049–2056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lipsley BA, Gates J, Tenover FC, Plorde JJ: Factors affecting the clinical value of microscopy for acid-fast bacilli. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1984, 6: 214–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Snider DE, Hopewell PC, Mills J, Reichman LB: Mycobacterioses and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. American Reviews of Respiratory Diseases 1987, 136: 492–496.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bass JB, Farer LS, Hopewell PC, Jacobs RF, Snider DE: Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. American Reviews of Respiratory Diseases 1990, 142: 725–735.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

La Rocco, M.T., Wanger, A., Ocera, H. et al. Evaluation of a commercial rRNA amplification assay for direct detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in processed sputum. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13, 726–731 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276055

Keywords

Navigation