Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physicians' values and physician-value neutrality

  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For years articles have decried the lack of empathy in physicians' relationships with patients. In addition to being empathetic, physicians are called upon to assume the posture of “value neutrality,” i.e., not imposing one's values when dealing with patients. Empathy is clearly an expression of deeply held values; even the language used to define it is value-laden. Physicians are consistently called upon to exhibit traits which are expressions of their underlying values. However, if proponents of value-neutrality are to be taken literally one must not impose any of one's values on one's patients. But then one wonders how empathy could ever be expressed; further, it is hard to imagine what a truly “value neutral” physician would be like. It is time we recognize that any relationship between two persons requires the expression of values from both parties. These values help shape that relationship and define its further history. Physicians are not excluded from this process just because they consider themselves “professionals.” Divulging personal values to patients is both more honest and more in keeping with the concepts of justice, beneficence, non maleficence, and autonomy than to feign value-neutrality. A presentation of some type statement of values is timely and would give patients an idea of where a physician stands on a myriad of issues. Rather than being value-neutral, value “non-neutrality” seems a more right and reasonable posture for physicians to assume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Medical Association, “Public Opinion on Health Care Issues.” May, 1992.

  2. Osler, William, “Address.”Albany Medical Annals, 20(6), 1899, p. 308.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg, James E. and Towers, Bernard “The Practice of Empathy as a Prerequisite for Informed Consent.”Theoretical Medicine 7(2), 1986.

  4. Ceccin, Gianfranco, “Hypothesizing, Circularity, and Neutrality Revisited.”Family Process 26(4), 1987, p. 405.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spiro, Howard. “What is Empathy and can it be Taught?”Annals of Internal Medicine, 116(10), 1992, p. 845.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petersdorf, Robert G. “Are we Educating a Medical Professional who Cares?”American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146, 1992, p. 1339.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Squier, Roger W. “A Model of Empathic Understanding and Adherence to Treatment Regimens in Practitioner-Patient Relationships.”Social Science and Medicine 30(3), 1990, p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glick, Shimon M. “The Empathic Physician: Nature and Nurture,” in Howard Spiro, Mary G. McCrea Curnen, Enid Peschel, and Deborah St. James eds.Empathy and the Practice of Medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993, pp. 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Levasseur, James and Vance, David R. “Doctors, Nurses, and Empathy,” inEmpathy and the Practice of Medicine, pp. 76–84.

  10. Muslin, Homan L. and Schlessinger, Nathan. “Toward the Teaching and Learning of Empathy.”Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 35(4), 1971.

  11. Glick, Shimon M.Op. cit. “

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid. pp. pp. 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petersdorf, Robert G. “Are we Educating a Medical Professional who Cares?”American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146, 1992, p. 1338.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Subcommittee on Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist, American Board of Internal Medicine. “Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist.”Annals of Internal Medicine, 99, 1983.

  15. Bird, Lewis P. and Barlow, James,Codes of Medical Ethics, Oaths, and Prayers. Richardson, Texas: Christian Medical Dental Society, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gribble, James and Oliver, Graham. “Empathy and Education.”Studies in Philosophy and Education, 8, 1973, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Free, Noel K, Green, Bonnie L., Grace, Mary C., Chernus, Linda A., and Witman, Roy M. “Empathy and Outcome in Brief Focal Dynamic Therapy.”American Journal of Psychiatry, 142(8), 1985.

  18. Shapiro, D.A. “Empathy, Warmth and Genuineness in Psychotherapy.”British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 8, 1969, p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clearly statements that suggest we can experienceexactly what a patient feels, or understandcompletely another's experiences are problematic from a metaphysical perspective. There is, as I see it, no way to know whether another's perspective is the same as one's own (admittedly this statement is contentious)! Wiseman, Mary B. “Empathetic Identification.”American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(2), 1978. Nagel, Thomas, “What is it like to be a Bat?” inMortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

  20. Squier, Roger W.Op. cit., “ p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goldman, Alvin. “Empathy, Mind, and Morals.”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, 66(3), 1993.

  23. Nightingale, Stephen D., Yarnold, Paul R., and Greenbers, Michael S. “Sympathy, Empathy, and Physician Resource Utilization.”Journal of General Internal Medicine, 6, 1991.

  24. Zabarenko, Ralph N. and Zabarenko, Lucy M. “Empathy.”Current Psychiatric Therapies, 19, 1980, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  25. It is interesting to note that a number of studies have shown an inverse correlation with the amount of medical education, the MCAT score, and empathy. Spiro, Howard M. “Experts in Empathy.”Drug Therapy, July, 1992. Lief, Harold I. and Fow, Renee C. “Training for ‘Detached Concern’ in Medical Students.” InThe Psychological Basis of Medical Practice. Life, Harold I., ed) New York: Harper and Row, 1963, pp. 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spiro, Howard. “What is Empathy: Can it be Taught?” inEmpathy and the Practice of Medicine.

  27. Ci, Jiwie. “Conscience, Sympathy, and the Foundation of Morality.”American Philosophical Quarterly, 28(1), 1991, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scheman, Naomi. “On Sympathy.”The Monist, 62, 1979, p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clyne, Max B. “How Personal is Personal Care in General Practice?”Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 24(141), 1974, p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  30. King, Valeria J. “Passion and Compassion.”North Carolina Journal of Medicine, 53(4), 1992.

  31. Pellegrino, Edmund D. “Profession, Patient, Compassion, Consent: Meditations on Medical Philology.”Connecticut Medicine, 42(3), 1978.

  32. Linenthal, Arthur J. “Past and Present.”The Pharos, 50(4), 1987.

  33. Goldman, Alvin I. “Ethics and Cognitive Science.”Ethics, 103, 1993.

  34. Sherlock, Richard. “Reasonable Men and Sick Human Beings.”American Journal of Medicine, 80, 1986, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Curzer, Howard J. “Is Care a Virtue for Health Care Professionals?”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 18, 1993, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberg, James E. and Towers, Bernard. “The Practice of Empathy as a Prerequisite for Informed Consent.”Theoretical Medicine, 7(2), 1986, p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dorpat, Theodore L. “On Neutrality.”International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 6, 1977, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Fraassen, Bas C.The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibid., pp. 87–88.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cassell, Eric J.The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ibid., p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dorpat, Theodore L. “On Neutrality.”International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 6:39–64, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid.,

    Google Scholar 

  44. Freud, Sigmund.Recommendations to Physicians Practicing Psycho-Analysis. Standard Edition 12, 1912.

  45. Kevorkian, Jack. “The Last Fearsome Taboo:Medical Aspects of Planned Death.”Medicien and Law, 7, 1988, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenberg, James E. and Bernard Towers,op. cit.

  47. Osler, William.Aequanimitas. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1932. pp. 3–11. and, Osler, William.Aphorisms. New York: Henry Schuman, 1950, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dougherty, Charles J. “Ethical Values at Stake in Health Care Reform.” JAMA 268(17), 1992.

  49. Ibid., 2 40(9).

  50. Edell, Dean S. “Acting for Patients.” JAMA 269(9), 1993.

  51. Orentlicher, David. “The Illusion of Patient Choice in End-of-Life Decisions.” JAMA 267(15), 1992. p: 2101.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Miller, Bruce L. “Autonomy and the Refusal of Lifesaving Treatment,” in Gorovitz, Samuel, Macklin, Ruth et al., eds.,Moral Problems in Medicine. 2nd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Beauchamp, Tom L., and Childress, James F.Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Squier, Roger W.Op cit., “ p. 326. p. 326.

    Google Scholar 

  55. The concept of coercion is not so clearly defined, see; Nozick, Robert, “Coercion.” InPhilosophy, Science, and Method. S. Morgenbesser, ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1969. pp. 440–472. However, I take the sense of coercion as described by Joel Rudinow, “Coercion always involves irrestible incentives.” Rudinow, Joel. “Manipulation.”Ethics 88, 1978, p. 341.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shimon Glick describes an interesting study, at Ben Gurion University in Israel, consisting of 231 questionnaires. They found that: “Among ideologies influencing their behavior the ‘empathic compassionate’ physician had a higher proportion with religion as a dominant influence than did other groups” (page 94). He states further, “it is true that the kind of saintly behavior typified by Mother teresa or Dr. Schweitzer is found almost exclusively among those with a deeply religious commitment.” S. Glick,op. cit., p. 92.

  57. Wright, Virginia Baxter. “Will Quitting Smoking Help Medicine Solve its Financial Problems?”Inquiry 23, 1986.

  58. Cassell, Eric J.Op. cit., p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  60. This is a distinction drawn by; Shelly, Judith Allen and Miller, Arlene B. InValues in Conflict. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  61. McKee, Denise D. and Chappel John N. “Spirituality and Medical Practice.”The Journal of Family Practice, 35(2), 1992.

  62. American Psychiatric Association Committee on Religion and Psychiatry. “Guidelines Regarding Possible Conflict between Psychiatrists, Religious Commitments and Psychiatric Practice.”American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1990.

  63. McKee, Denise D. and Chappel John N. “Spirituality and Medical Practice.”The Journal of Family Practice 35(2), 1992. p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Clouser, Roy A.The Myth of Religious Neutrality. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN: 1991, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  65. I take a broad definition of religion here such as that of Edward Caird, “A Man's religion is the expression of his ultimate attitude to the universe, the summed-up meaning and purport of his whole consciousness of things.” In Paul Edwards, ed.,The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Volume 7. New York: Macmillan, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Although beyond the realm of this article, it is interesting to speculate on studies correlating the lack of empathy with aggressive or antisocial behavior. Miller, Paul A., and Eisenberg, Nancy. “The Relation of Empathy to Aggressive and Externalizing/Antisocial Behavior.”Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 1988.

  67. Dorpat, Theodore L. “On Neutrality.”International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 6, 1977. p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Marshfield Clinic of St. Joseph's Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Marshfield, Wisconsin

    John F. Peppin D.O.

Authors
  1. John F. Peppin D.O.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peppin, J.F. Physicians' values and physician-value neutrality. J Relig Health 34, 287–300 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02248738

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02248738

Keywords

Search

Navigation