Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling and efficiency of metric matrix distance geometry: A novel partial metrization algorithm

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this paper, we present a reassessment of the sampling properties of the metric matrix distance geometry algorithm, which is in wide-spread use in the determination of three-dimensional structures from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data. To this end, we compare the conformational space sampled by structures generated with a variety of metric matrix distance geometry protocols. As test systems we use an unconstrained polypeptide, and a small protein (rabbit neutrophil defensin peptide 5) for which only few tertiary distances had been derived from the NMR data, allowing several possible folds of the polypeptide chain. A process called ‘metrization’ in the preparation of a trial distance matrix has a very large effect on the sampling properties of the algorithm. It is shown that, depending on the metrization protocol used, metric matrix distance geometry can have very good sampling properties'indeed, both for the unconstrained model system and the NMR-structure case. We show that the sampling properties are to a great degree determined by the way in which the first few distances are chosen within their bounds. Further, we present a new protocol (‘partial metrization’) that is computationally more efficient but has the same excellent sampling properties. This novel protocol has been implemented in an expanded new release of the program X-PLOR with distance geometry capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billeter, M., Havel, T.F. and Wüthrich, K. (1986)J. Comput. Client.,8, 132–141. Braun, W. and Go, N. (1985) J. Mol. Biol., 186,611-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S. and Karplus, M. (1983)J. Comp. Chem.,4, 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünger, A.T. (1991) InTopics in Molecular Biology (Ed., Goodfellow, J.M.) Macmillan Press Ltd., London, pp. 137–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünger, A.T. and Karplus, M. (1991)Acc. of Chem. Res.,24, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brünger, A.T., Clore, G.M., Gronenborn, A. M. and Karplus, M. (1987)Protein Eng.,1, 399–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brünger, A.T. (1990) X-PLOR software manual version 2.1., New Haven, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.M. and Gronenborn, A.M. (1991)Science,252, 1390–1399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen, G.M. and Havel, T.F. (1988)Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Research Studies Press, Taunton, Somerset, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dial, R., Glover, F., Karney, D. and Klingman, D. (1979)Networks,9, 215–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E. W. (1959)Numer. Math.,1, 269–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dress, A.W.M. and Havel, T.F. (1988)Discrete Appl. Math.,19, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, J. R., Gabow, H.N., Shrairman, R. and Tarjan, R. E. (1988)Comm. of the ACM,31, 1343–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easthope, P.L. and Havel, T.F. (1989)Bull. Math. Bio.,51, 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, R.R., Bodenhausen, G. and Wokaun, A. (1986)Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwiger, M.A. and Fox, G.E. (1989)J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.,7, 749–771.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, D.R. and Reid, B.R. (1986)Biochemistry,25, 5341–5350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Havel, T.F., Kuntz, I.D. and Crippen, G.M. (1983)Bull. Math. Bio.,45, 665–720; (1985)errata in Bull. Math. Bio.,47, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, T.F. and Wüthrich, K. (1984)Bull. Math. Bio.,46, 673–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, T.F. (1990)Biopolymers,29, 1565–1585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, J.C. and Brown, F.K. (1989)J. Am. Chem. Soc.,111, 7323–7327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, I.D., Crippen, G.M. and Kollman, P.A. (1979)Biopolymers,18, 939–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R.M., Bassolino, D.A., Kitchen, D.B. and Pardi, A. (1989)Biochemistry,28, 9361–9372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, W.J., Hare, D.R. and Pardi, A. (1989)Biochemistry,28, 7045–7052.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, M., Clore, G.M. and Gronenborn, A.M. (1988)FEBS Lett.,229, 317–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilges, M., Kuszewski, J. and Brünger, A.T. (1991) InComputational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules (Ed., Hoch, J.C.) Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardi, A., Hare, D.R., Selsted, M.E., Morrison, R.D., Bassolino, D.A. and Bach, A.C. (1988)J. Mol. Biol.,201, 625–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M.J.D. (1977)Mathematical Programming,12, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitter, J. (1987)J. Appl. Math. Physics (ZAMP),38, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarjan, R.E. (1983)Data Structures and Network Algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, J.F. and Kuntz, I.D. (1989)J. Cell Biochem., Suppl. 13A, no. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüthrich, K., Billeter, M. and Braun, W. (1983)J. Mol. Biol.,169, 949–961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wüthrich, K. (1986)NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M. & Brünger, A.T. Sampling and efficiency of metric matrix distance geometry: A novel partial metrization algorithm. J Biomol NMR 2, 33–56 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192799

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192799

Keywords

Navigation