Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of environmental factors on the activity ofGammarus pseudolimnaeus (Amphipoda)

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various environmental parameters which may affect the activity ofGammarus pseudolimnaeus were examined in the laboratory. The animals' responses were monitored automatically using an ultraviolet beam interruption technique. The basic diel activity pattern in the fall showed high rates of drifting at night but in the summer showed uniform drift throughout the light/dark cycle. Upstream activity was greater in the summer when it compensated approximately 11% of the number of animals drifting downstream. A large-sized gravel substrate (31.5 mm diameter) produced significantly lower night-time drift than either a medium-sized gravel (11.0 mm diameter) or a small-sized gravel (3.4 mm diameter). Animals drifted more at current speeds of 5 to 15 cm/s than at 20 to 25 cm/s. The introduction of rainbow trout to the tanks in the day or night caused almost total cessation of drift and upstream activity within minutes. Trials with fish water suggested that the amphipods detect some form of labile exudate produced by the fishes. Additions of toxicants, in the form of sulphuric acid and NaCl, produced changes in activity levels before lethal concentrations were reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 1978. Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 1231–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, E. L., 1958. Freshwater amphipod crustaceans of glaciated North America. Can. Field-Nat. 72: 55–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, R. A. & Hynes, H. B. N., 1977. The effect of road deicing salt on the drift of stream benthos. Environ. Pollut. 14: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennert, H. G., Dennert, A. L., Kant, P., Pinkster, S. & Stock, J. H., 1969. Upstream and downstream migrations in relation to the reproductive cycle and to environmental factors in the amphipod, Gammarus zaddachi. Bijdr. Dierk. 39: 11–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. S. & Waters, T. F., 1967. Effects of light intensity on the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 48: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultin, L., 1971. Upstream movement of Gammarus p. pulex (Amphipoda) in a south Swedish stream. Oikos 22: 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1955. The reproductive cycle of some British freshwater Gammaridae. J. Anim. Ecol. 24: 352–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. & Harper, F., 1972. The life histories of Gammarus lacustris and G. pseudolimnaeus in southern Ontario. Crustaceana 3: 328–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleerekoper, H. & Mogensen, J., 1963. Role of olfaction in the orientation of Petromyzon marinus. 1. Response to a single amine in prey's body odour. Physiol. Zool. 36: 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R. & Hynes, H. B. N., 1981. The distribution and production of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus (Crustacea; Amphipoda) along a reach of the Credit River, Ontario. Freshwat. Biol. 11: 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijering, M. P. D., 1972. Experimental studies on drift and upstream and downstream movements of gammarids in running water. Arch. Hydrobiol. 70: 133–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijering, M. P. D., 1973. Quantitative Untersuchungen zur Drift and Aufwanderung von Gammarus fossarum Koch in einem Mittelgebirgsbach. Verh. Ges. Ökologie, Saarbrucken 1973, 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley, W. L., 1964. Upstream movements of Gammarus (Amphipoda) in Doe Run Meade Country, Kentucky. Ecology 45: 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, K., 1974. Stream drift as a chronobiological phenomenon in running water ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 5: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky, B. L., 1980. Predator-prey interactions between stoneflies and mayflies: behavioural observations. Ecology 61: 932–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C. P., 1972. The distribution of the amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Bousfield as influenced by oxygen consumption, substratum, and current velocity. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 91: 514–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. A. & Magnuson, J. J., 1976. Behavioural response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57: 751–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. R., 1977. A discussion on the use of behaviour by Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Bousfield in evaluating environmental stress. Proc. 3rd Aquatic Toxicity Workshop, Halifax, N. S., Nov. 2–3, 1976. Environmental Protection Service Tech. Rep. No. EPS-5AR-77–1, Halifax, Canada, pp. 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. R., Hynes, H. B. N. & Kaushik, N. K., 1975. Laboratory experiments on factors affecting the activity of Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Bousfield. Freshwat. Biol. 5: 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1962. Diurnal periodicity in the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 43: 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1972. The drift of stream insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 17: 253–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D., 1980. Temporal patterns in the recolonization of stream benthos. Arch. Hydrobiol. 90: 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudley Williams, D., Moore, K.A. The effect of environmental factors on the activity ofGammarus pseudolimnaeus (Amphipoda). Hydrobiologia 96, 137–147 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185429

Keywords

Navigation