Skip to main content
Log in

Single dose and conventional treatment for acute bacterial and non-bacterial dysuria and frequency in general practice

Behandlung der akuten bakteriellen und nicht bakteriellen Dysurie mit Harndrang in der Allgemeinpraxis — Vergleich einer Einmaldosis mit einer konventionellen Behandlung

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A five day course of calvulanate-potentiated amoxicillin (Augmentin®) has been compared with a single oral dose of fosfomycin trometamol in the treatment of patients complaining of symptoms suggesting urinary tract infection. The study took place in a single urban general practice of 15,000 patients in Cheshire. The microbiology was performed at a London Teaching Hospital. 141 patients entered the trial. 65 had a significant bacteriuria, 62 of which were assessable for the ability of the trial drugs to eradicate bacteriuria: 29 patients received clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and 33 fosfomycin trometamol. The cure rates, assessed at five to ten days and at four to six weeks post treatment, were 72% and 65%, respectively for clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and 85% and 81%, respectively for fosfomycin trometamol. Side effects, assessed in all 141 patients, occurred in 11.6% receiving clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin and in 8.3% receiving fosfomycin. Statistically there is no difference between any of these findings and the effect of sample size is discussed. 69 patients were symptomatic but did not have a significant bacteriuria (“urethral syndrome”). These patients were assessed for the effect of treatment in relieving symptoms: 33 received fosfomycin trometamol and 36 clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin. The success and speed of relieving the symptoms were very similar in the two groups. The finding that both groups responded equally well appears to refute an aetiological role for lactobacilli and diphtheroids in the “urethral syndrome”, since these organisms are resistant to fosfomycin but sensitive to clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin.

Zusammenfassung

Patienten, die Beschwerden einer Harnwegsinfektion hatten, wurden entweder fünf Tage lang mit Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure (Augmentan®) oder mit einer oralen Einzeldosis von Fosfomycin Trometamol behandelt. Die Studie wurde in einer Allgemeinpraxis in Cheshire durchgeführt, die 15 000 Patienten versorgt. 141 Patienten wurden in die Studie aufgenommen. 65 hatten eine signifikante Bakteriurie, davon konnten 62 in die Auswertung bezüglich Eradikation der Bakteriurie durch das Prüfmedikament einbezogen werden; 29 Patienten erhielten Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure und 33 Fosfomycin Trometamol. In der ersten Gruppe waren am 5.–10. Tag und vier bis sechs Wochen nach Therapieende 72% beziehungsweise 65% geheilt, die entsprechenden Zahlen für Fosfomycin Trometamol waren 85% und 81%. Bei 11,6% der insgesamt ausgewerteten 141 Patienten traten Nebenwirkungen unter Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure und bei 8,3% unter Fosfomycin Trometamol auf. Ein statistischer Unterschied zwischen diesen Befunden besteht nicht, die Bedeutung der Probengröße hierfür wird diskutiert. 69 Patienten klagten über Beschwerden, hatten jedoch keine signifikante Bakteriurie (urethrales Syndrom). Sie wurden im Hinblick auf eine Linderung ihrer Beschwerden durch Fosfomycin Trometamol (n=33) oder Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure (n=36) geprüft. In beiden Gruppen war der Einfluß auf die Beschwerden nach Grad und Geschwindigkeit sehr ähnlich. Das vergleichbar gute Ansprechen der beiden Gruppen scheint gegen eine ätiologische Bedeutung von Laktobazillen und Diphtheroiden beim „urethralen Syndrom“ zu sprechen, denn diese Bakterien sind gegen Fosfomycin Trometamol resistent, gegen Amoxicillin-Clavulansäure hingegen empfindlich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waters, W. E. Prevalence of symptoms of urinary tract infection in women. Br. J. Prevent. Soc. Med. 23 (1969) 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, D.: A general practitioner's view of the laboratory examination of urine. In:Meers, P. D. (ed.): The bacteriological examination of urine: report of a workshop on needs and methods. HMSO-London 1978, pp. 39–40.

  3. Walker, M., Heady, J. A., Shaper, A. G. The prevalence of dysuria in women in London. J. R. Coll. Gen. Practit. 33 (1983) 411–415.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charlton, C. A. C., Crowther, A., Davies, J. G., Dynes, J., Howard, M. R. A., Mann, P. G., Rye, S. Three day and ten day chemotherapy for urinary tract infections in general practice. Br. Med. J. i (1976) 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gruneberg, R. N., Brumfitt, W. Single dose treatment of acute urinary tract infection: a controlled trial. Br. Med. J. iii (1967) 649–651.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey, R. R. (ed.): Single dose therapy of urinary tract infection. Adis Press, Sydney 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. Single dose antibiotic therapy in urinary tract infections. In:Andreucci, V. E. (ed.): International Yearbook of Nephrology 1989. Kluwer, Massachusetts 1989, pp. 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ABPI Data Sheet Compendium 1988–89: Datapharm Publications, London 1988.

  9. Ferrari, V., Bonanomi, L., Borcia, M., Lodola, E., Marca, G.: A new fosfomycin derivative with much improved bioavailability by oral route. Chemother. Antimicrob. iv (1981) 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gallego, A., Rodriguez, A., Mata, J. M. Fosfomycin: pharmacological studies. Drugs of Today 10 (1974) 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maskell, R.: Are fastidious organisim an important cause of dysuria and frequency? — the case for. In:Asscher, A. W., Brumfitt, W. (eds.): Microbial diseases in nephrology. Wiley, Chichester 1986, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kunin, C. M. Foreword. In:Bailey, R. R. (ed.): Single dose therapy of urinary tract infection. Adis Press, Sydney 1983, pp. viii-x.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment of urinary infections. In:Neu, H. C., Williams, J. D. (eds.): New trends in urinary tract infections. Karger, Basel 1988, pp. 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Loulerque, J., Pinon, G., Laudat, P., Audurier, A. La résistance a la fosfomycine chezStaphylococcus saprophyticus et chez les autres espèces de stapylococcus coagulase negative. Ann. Microbiol. (Institut Pasteur) 135A (1984) 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stamboulian, D., Sarachian, B., Arguelllo, E., Belforte, B. Evaluation of amoxicillin with and without BRL 14151 in the treatment of urinary tract infections. In:Nelson, J. D., Grassi, C. (eds.): Current Chemotherapy and Infectious Diseases. American Society of Medicine-Washington 1980, pp. 338–340.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nishiura, T. Efficacy of Augmentin (BRL 25 000) in urinary tract infections. In:Leigh, D. A., Robinson, O. P. W. (eds.): Augmentin: clavulanate-potentiated amoxicillin. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam 1982, pp. 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gurwith, M. J., Stein, G. E., Gurwith, D. Prospective comparison of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and cefaclor in treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 24 (1983) 716–719.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karachalios, G. N., Georgiopoulos, A. N. Treatment of acute urinary tract infections with amoxicillin and clavulanic acid combination. IRCS Med. Sci. 12 (1984) 1042–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Iravani, A., Richard, G. A. Treatment of urinary infections with a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22 (1982) 672–677.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper, J., Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. A comparative trial of co-trimoxazole and cephradine in patients with recurrent urinary infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 6 (1980) 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group Coordinated multicenter study of norfloxacin versus trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infections. J. Infect. Dis. 155 (1987) 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silverblatt, F. J. Clinical trials and statistical rigor — are the benefits necessarily worth the cost? J. Infect. Dis. 155 (1987) 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stamm, W. E., Wagner, K. F., Amsel, R., Alexander, E. R., Turck, M., Counts, G. W., Holmes, K. K. Causes of the acute urethral syndrome in women. New Engl. J. Med. 303 (1980) 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  24. O'Dowd, T. C., Pill, R., Smail, J. E., Davis, R. H. Irritable urethral syndrome: follow-up study in general practice. Br. Med. J. 292 (1986) 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Smith, G. W. Comparative trial of cefuroxime axetil in recurrent urinary tract infections, illustrating importance of 6-week follow-up. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 1442–1443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, J., Raeburn, A., Brumfitt, W. et al. Single dose and conventional treatment for acute bacterial and non-bacterial dysuria and frequency in general practice. Infection 18, 65–69 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01641417

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01641417

Keywords

Navigation