Skip to main content
Log in

The unitary dual for complex classical Lie groups

  • Published:
Inventiones mathematicae Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arthur, J.: On some problems suggested by the trace formula. (Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 1041, pp. 1–50) Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • [BV1] Barbasch, D., Vogan, D.: Unipotent representations of complex semisimple Lie groups. Ann. Math.121, 41–110 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • [BV2] Barbasch, D., Vogan, D.: Primitive ideals and orbital integrals in complex classical groups. Math. Ann.259, 153–199 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • [BV3] Barbasch, D., Vogan, D.: Primitive ideals and orbital integrals in complex exceptional groups. J. Algebra80, 350–382 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • [BG] Bernstein, I.N., Gelfand, S.I.: Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representations of semisimple Lie algebras. Compos. Math.41, 245–285 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • [BC] Boe, B., Collingwood, D.: A multiplicity one theorem for holomorphically induced modules. Math. Z.192, 265–282 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • [Bou] Bourbaki, N.: Groupes et algebres de Lie. Paris Hermann 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • [D1] Duflo, M.: Representations irreductibles des groupes semisimples complexes. (Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 497, pp. 26–88). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • [D2] Duflo, M.: Representations unitaires irreducibles des groupes semisimples complexes de rang deux. Bull. Soc. Math. France107, 55–96 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • [E] Enright, T.: Relative Lie algebra cohomology and unitary representations of complex semisimple Lie groups. Duke Math. J.46, 513–525 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • [ES] Enright, T., Shelton, B.: Categories of highest weight modules: applications to classical hermitian pairs. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. (to appear)

  • [J] Joseph, A.: Dixmier's problem for Verma and principal series submodules. J. London Math. Soc.20, 193–204 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • [KP] Kraft, H., Procesi, C.: On the geometry of conjugacy classes in classical groups. Comment. Math. Helv.57, 539–601 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • [KZ] Knapp, A., Zuckerman, G.: Classification theorems for representations of semisimple Lie groups. (Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 587, pp. 138–159) Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • [L] Lusztig, G.: Characters of reductive groups over a finite field. Ann. Math. Stud.107, 1–384 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • [SV] Speh, B., Vogan, D.: Reducibility of generalized principal series representations. Acta Math.145, 227–299 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • [V1] Vogan, D.: Representations of real reductive Lie groups. Boston: Birkhäuser 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • [V2] Vogan, D.: Unitarizability of certain series of representations. Ann. Math.120, 141–187 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • [V3] Vogan, D.: The unitary dual ofGL(n). Invent. Math.83, 449–505 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • [V4] Vogan, D.: Irreducible characters of semisimple Lie groups III, proof of the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjectures in the integral case. Invent. Math.71, 381–417 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • [Z] Zuckerman, G.: Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representations of semisimple Lie groups. Ann. Math.106, 295–308 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by NSF grant DMS8603172

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbasch, D. The unitary dual for complex classical Lie groups. Invent Math 96, 103–176 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01393972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01393972

Navigation