Summary
During early embryogeny, the development of the suspensor is rapid both in terms of size and fresh weight; structural differentiation can be observed as early as the proembryo stage with the formation of wall ingrowths. Ingrowths first appear in the outer wall of the suspensor cells adjacent to the integumentary tapetum, soon ingrowths begin to form in the inner suspensor cells as well. A basal-terminal gradation in nuclear size exists, with the largest nuclei in the basal suspensor cells. Cytologically, the suspensor cells appear to be very active, especially when the embryo reaches heart stage. Initially, the development of the embryo proper lags behind the suspensor, but its size and fresh weight increase rapidly as development proceeds. The volume of the liquid endosperm rises most rapidly during the late heart stage; and it is absorbed soon after. A cellular endospermic sheath surrounds the embryo, separating it from the liquid endosperm. Structural differentiation also occurs in the cellular endosperm cells with the formation of wall ingrowths in those cells that abut directly onto the integumentary tapetum. Both the suspensor and the cellular endosperm appear to remain active through the maturation of the seed. Storage bodies are formed in the cotyledons as well as in the embryonic axis. In the suspensor and the cellular endosperm, starch grains and lipid bodies can be found at the maturation stage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpi, A., F. Tognoni, andF. D'Amato, 1975: Growth regulator levels in embryo and suspensor ofPhaseolus coccineus at two stages of development. Planta127, 153–162.
Brady, T., 1972: Cytological and biochemical studies on the suspensor and suspensor polytene chromosomes ofPhaseolus. New Haven, Connecticut: Thesis, Yale University.
—, 1973: Feulgen cytophotometric determination of the DNA content of the embryo proper and suspensor cells ofPhaseolus coccineus. Cell Differentiation2, 65–75.
Brown, M. M., 1917: The development of the embryo-sac and of the embryo inPhaseolus vulgaris. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club44, 535–544.
Cionini, P. G., A. Bennici, A. Alpi, andF. D'Amato, 1976: Suspensor, gibberellin andin vitro development ofPhaseolus coccineus embryos. Planta131, 115–117.
Clutter, M., T. Brady, V. Walbot, andI. Sussex, 1974: Macromolecular synthesis in diploid and polytene cells in bean embryos. J. Cell Biol.63, 1097–1102.
—, andI. M. Sussex, 1968: Ultrastructural development of bean embryo cells containing polytene chromosomes. J. Cell Biol.39, 26 a.
Cooper, D. C., 1938: Embryology ofPisum sativum. Bot. Gaz.100, 123–132.
Corsi, G., 1972: The suspensor ofEruca sativa Miller (Cruciferae) during embryogenesisin vitro. G. Bot. Ital.106, 41–54.
Eeuwens, C. J., andW. W. Schwabe, 1975: Seed and pod wall development inPisum sativum, L. in relation to extracted and applied hormones. J. exp. Bot.26, 1–14.
Esau, K., 1965: Plant Anatomy. New York: J. Wiley.
Feder, N., andT. P. O'Brien, 1968: Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. Amer. J. Bot.55, 123–144.
Fisher, D. B., 1968: Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie16, 92–96.
Gillard, D. F., andD. C. Walton, 1976: Abscisic acid metabolism by a cell-free preparation fromEchinocystis lobata liquid endosperm. Plant Physiol.58, 790–795.
Gunning, B. E. S., J. S. Pate, andL. G. Briarty, 1968: Specialized “Transfer Cells” in minor veins of leaves and their possible significance in phloem translocation. J. Cell Biol.37, C 7–12.
— —, 1974: Transfer cells. In: Dynamic aspects of plant ultrastructure (Robards, A. W., ed.), pp. 441–480. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Jensen, W. A., 1974: Reproduction in flowering plants. In: Dynamic aspects of plant ultra-structure (Robards, A. W., ed.), pp. 481–503. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Lüttge, U., andE. Schnepf, 1976: Elimination processes by glands. Organic substances. In: Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New Series, II B (Lüttge, U., andM. G. Pitman, eds.), pp. 244–277. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.
Maheshwari, P., 1950: An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Marinos, N. G., 1970: Embryogenesis of pea (Pisum sativum). I. The cytological environment of the developing embryo. Protoplasma70, 261–279.
Mollenhauer, H. H., 1964: Plastic embedding mictures for use in electron microscopy. Stain Technol.39, 111–114.
Nagl, W., 1974: ThePhaseolus suspensor and its polytene chromosomes. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.73, 1–44.
Newcomb, W., 1973: The development of the embryo sac of sunflowerHelianthus annuus after fertilization. Canad. J. Bot.51, 879–890.
—, andL. C. Fowke, 1974:Stellaria media embryogenesis: the development and ultrastructure of the suspensor. Canad. J. Bot.52, 607–614.
Norstog, K., 1967: Studies on the survival of very small barley embryos in culture. Torrey Bot. Club Bull.94, 223–229.
—, andR. M. Klein, 1972: Development of cultured barley embryos. II. Precocious germination and dormancy. Canad. J. Bot.50, 1887–1894.
Pate, J. S., andB. E. S. Gunning, 1972: Transfer cells. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.23, 173–196.
— —, andF. F. Milliken, 1970: Function of transfer cells in the nodal regions of stems, particularly in relation to the nutrition of young seedlings. Protoplasma71, 313–334.
Ponzi, R., andP. Pizzolongo, 1972: The ultrastructure of suspensor cells ofIpomoea purpurea Roth. J. submic. Cytol.4, 199–204.
Pool, C. R., 1973: Prestaining oxidation by acidified H2O2 for revealing Schiff-positive sites in epon-embedded sections. Stain Technol.48, 123–126.
Rijven, A. H. G. C., 1952:In vitro studies on the embryo ofCapsella bursa-pastoris. Acta Bot. Neerl.1, 157–200.
Ryczkowski, M., 1960: Changes of the osmotic value during the development of the ovule. Planta55, 343–356.
—, 1974: Some physico-chemical factors in the ovule during embryogenesis. In: Fertilization in higher plants (Linskens, H. F., ed.), pp. 233–240. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sachs, T., 1968: On the determination of the pattern of vascular tissue in peas. Ann. Bot.32, 781–790.
Schnepf, E., andW. Nagl, 1970: Über einige Strukturbesonderheiten der Suspensorzellen vonPhaseolus vulgaris. Protoplasma69, 133–143.
Schulz, P., andW. A. Jensen, 1969:Capsella embryogenesis: the suspensor and the basal cell. Protoplasma67, 139–163.
Schwab, D. W., E. Simmons, andJ. Scala, 1969: Fine structure changes during function of the digestive gland of venus's-flytrap. Amer. J. Bot.56, 88–100.
Simoncioli, C., 1974: Ultrastructural characteristics ofDiplotaxis erucoides (L.) DC. suspensor. G. Bot. Ital.108, 175–189.
Smith, J. G., 1971: An analytical approach to the culture of globular bean embryos. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. of Michigan. Ann Arbor, Mich.
—, 1973: Embryo development inPhaseolus vulgaris. II. Analysis of selected inorganic ions, ammonia, organic acids, and sugar in the endosperm liquid. Plant Physiol.51, 454–458.
Steeves, T. A., andI. M. Sussex, 1972: Patterns in plant development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Sterling, C., 1955: Nucellus and endosperm in the seed of lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.). Torrey Bot. Club Bull.82, 39–49.
Sussex, I., M. Clutter, V. Walbot, andT. Brady, 1973: Biosynthetic activity of the suspensor ofPhaseolus coccineus. Caryologia25 suppl., 261–272.
Walbot, V., T. Brady, M. Clutter, andI. Sussex, 1972 a: Macromolecular synthesis during plant embryogeny: rates of RNA synthesis inPhaseolus coccineus embryos and suspensors. Develop. Biol.29, 104–111.
—,M. Clutter, andI. M. Sussex, 1972 b: Reproductive development and embryogeny inPhaseolus. Phytomorp.22, 59–68.
Wardlaw, C. W., 1965: Physiology of embryonic development in cormophytes. In: Encyclopedia of Plant physiology, XV/I (Ruhland, W., ed.), pp. 844–965). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer.
Weinstein, A. I., 1926: Cytological studies onPhaseolus vulgaris. Amer. J. Bot.13, 248–263.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeung, E.C., Clutter, M.E. Embryogeny ofPhaseolus coccineus: Growth and microanatomy. Protoplasma 94, 19–40 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275532
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01275532