Abstract
Five isofemale strains from each of four sympatric species,Drosophila immigrans, D. repleta, D. melanogaster, andD. affinis, were lightly anesthetized with ether, CO2, Flynap, or cold temperature. The photoresponse of each treatment group was measured in an open field and a Y-tube apparatus. Relative light values were compared with those of the unanesthetized control groups of each species, as well as among the different treatments themselves and among species. Significant differences between species were apparent for all treatments in the Y-tube and for all treatments except ether and CO2 in the open field. Response to anesthesia may differ between species due, in part, to their differing genotypes. Comparing treatment groups within species in the Y-tube design, all species exceptD. melanogaster showed significant differences between treatments. In the open field, onlyD. affinis was significantly affected. Particularly in the Y-tube, anesthetized flies generally differed significantly from the controls, indicating that the use of anesthesia during a behavioral study could cause deviations in behavior from that of normal unanesthetized flies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benzer, S. (1973). Genetic dissection of behavior.Sci. Am. 229:24–37.
Carpenter, F. W. (1905). The reactions of the pomace fly (Drosophila ampelophila Loew) to light, gravity, and mechanical stimulation.Am. Nat. 39, 157–171.
Deery, B. J., and Parsons, P. A. (1972). Ether resistance inDrosophila melanogaster.Theor Appl. Genet. 42:208–214.
Farnsworth, M. W. (1968). Effect of prolonged CO2 exposure on flight.Dros. Info. Serv. 43:147.
Gamo, S., Ogaki, M., and Nakashima-Tanaka, E. (1979). Inheritance of chloroform resistance inDrosophila melanogaster.Jpn. J. Genet. 54:229–234.
Gamo, S., Nakashima-Tanaka, E., and Ogaki, M. (1980). Inheritance of halothane resistance inDrosophila melanogaster.Jpn. J. Genet. 55:133–140.
Gamo, S., Megumi, T., Satoh, Y., and Nakashima-Tanaka, E. (1986). Opposing effects between60Co gamma-radiation damage and ether anesthesia in anesthetic-resistant strain ofDrosophila melanogaster: Evidence in chromosomal analysis.Jpn. J. Genet. 61:315–328.
Gilbert, D. G. (1981). Effects of CO2 vs. ether on two mating behavior components ofD. melanogaster.Dros. Info. Serv. 56:45–46.
Gimelfarb, A., and Willis, J. (1988). Etherizing parents reduces the weight of their offspring.Dros. Info. Serv. 67:43.
Götz, K. G., and Biesinger, R. (1985a). Centrophobism inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Behavioral modification induced by ether.J. Comp. Physiol A 156:319–327.
Götz, K. G., and Biesinger, R. (1985b). Centrophobism inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Physiological approach to search and search control.J. Comp. Physiol. A. 156:329–337.
Hadler, N. M. (1964). Heritability and phototaxis inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 50:1269–1277.
Joachim, D., and Curtsinger, J. W. (1990). Genotype and anesthetic determine mate choice inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 20:73–79.
Markow, T. A. (1975a). A genetic analysis of phototactic behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. I. Selection in the presence of inversions.Genetics,79:527–534.
Markow, T. A. (1975b). A genetic analysis of phototactic behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. II. Hybridization of divergent populations.Behav. Genet 5:339–350.
Markow, T. A. (1979). Phototactic behavior ofDrosophila species at different temperatures.Am. Nat. 114:884–892.
Markow T. A., and Merriam, J. (1977) Phototactic and Geotactic behavior of countercurrent defective mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 7:447–455.
Markow, T. A., and Scavarda, N. J. (1977). Effect of age and of screening pigment mutations on the phototactic behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 7:139–146.
Markow, T. A., and Smith, W. L. (1977) Genetic analysis of phototactic behavior inDrosophila simulans.Genetics 85:273–278.
Matheson, A. C., and Parsons, P. A. (1973). The genetics of resistance to long-term exposure to CO2 inDrosophila melanogaster: An environmental stress leading to anoxia.Theor. Appl. Genet. 43:261–268.
Matheson, A. C., and Parsons, P. A. (1975). Long-term exposure to CO2 inDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans, using isofemale strains from natural populations.Am. Nat. 109:593–595.
McCrady, W. B., and Clark, M. A. (1983). Variation in response to CO2 inDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.J. Hered. 74:171–174.
Miller, G. V., Hansen, K. N., and Stark, W. S. (1981). Phototaxis inDrosophila: R1-6 input and interaction among ocellar and compound eye receptors.J. Insect Physiol. 27:813–819.
Miyan, J. A., and Ewing, A. W. (1985). Is the “click” mechanism of dipteran flight an artifact of CCL4 anaesthesia?J. Exp. Biol. 116:313–322.
Parsons, P. A. (1975). Phototactic responses along a gradient of light intensities for the sibling speciesDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 5:17–25.
Pittendrigh, C. S. (1958). Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. Roe A., and Simpson, G. G. (eds.). InBehavior and Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Ringo, J. M. (1971). The effects of anesthetization upon survival and behavior ofD. grimshawi.Dros. Info. Serv. 47:118–119.
Rockwell, R. F. (1980). Photobehavioral differentiation in natural populations ofDrosophila: Changes of photoresponse over time inDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Behav. Genet. 10:521–535.
Rockwell, R. F., and Seiger, M. B. (1973a). A comparative study of photoresponse inDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Behav. Genet. 3:163–174.
Rockwell, R. F., and Seiger, M. B. (1973b). Phototaxis inDrosophila: A critical evaluation.Am. Sci. 61:339–345.
Rockwell, R. F., Cooke, F., and Harmsen, R. (1975). Photobehavioral differentiation in natural populations ofDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Behav. Genet. 5:189–202.
Seiger, M. B., and Kertesz, J. A. (1987). The effect of relative humidity on photoresponse in sympatric species ofDrosophila: Short term exposure to desiccating environments.J. Insect Physiol. 33:477–480.
Seiger, M. B., and Khamis, H. J. (1987). A multifactorial behavioral study of coexisting Drosophilid species in nature.Evolution 41:209–217.
Seiger, M. B., and Seiger, L. A. (1979). A comparison of photoresponse in sibling sympatric species ofDrosophila.Am. Nat. 114:893–901.
Seiger, M. B., Seiger, L. A., and Kertesz, J. A. (1983). Photoresponse in relation to experimental design in sibling sympatric species ofDrosophila. Am. Midl. Nat.,109:163–168.
Spassky, B., and Dobzhansky, T. (1967). Responses of various strains ofDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis to light and gravity.Am. Nat. 101:59–63.
Stark, W. S. (1972). the effect of ether and carbon dioxide on the components of the ERG ofDrosophila.Dros. Info. Serv. 48:82.
Willmund, R., Emanns, A., Eusemann, B., and Roos, W. (1984). Mutants affecting plasticity of phototactic behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.J. Insect Physiol. 30:431–436.
Wogaman, D. J., and Seiger, M.B. (1983). Light intensity as a factor in the choice of an oviposition site byDrosophila pseudoobscura andDrosophila persimilis.Can J. Genet. Cytol. 25:370–377.
Wong, P. T., Kaplan, W. D., Trout, W. E., and Hanstein, B. (1972). Carbon dioxide induced changes in the electroretinogram ofDrosophila unaccompanied by altered phototactic behaviour.J. Insect. Physiol. 18:1493–1500.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seiger, M.B., Kink, J.F. The effect of anesthesia on the photoresponses of four sympatric species ofDrosophila . Behav Genet 23, 99–104 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067559
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067559