Abstract
The ‘Spello’ program was designed to use interactive speech feedback on a talking-computer system to improve children's spelling and phonological skills. In two versions of the program, the synthesizer pronounced the word to be spelled and the student tried to type in the word correctly. Both versions of the program showed the students which letters were correct in their spelling attempts. One version pronounced only the target word, as often as the child requested. The other version also provided intermediate speech feedback for children's spelling attempts, so they could hear how their own attempts sounded, and compare them to the target word. Twenty-eight children aged seven to fourteen studied 16 words they had misspelled on pretests and 16 words of related word structure. For children ten years or older, training with intermediate speech feedback led to greater benefits in phonological coding skills than training with word-only feedback, reflected in the ability to read nonsense words related in structure to the trained words. Intermediate speech feedback also led to a marginally significant advantage in spelling the trained words. When the groups switched conditions, however, there was no difference in their tested skills after a second week of training.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ROSS:
-
Reading with orthographic and speech segmentation
- WRAT:
-
Wide range achievement tests of spelling and reading
References
Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 51–69.
Ehri, L. C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read, pp. 121–195, in: M. L. Wolraich & D. Routh (eds.),Advances in Developmental and Behavioural Paediatrics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words,Journal of Reading Behaviour 19: 5–31.
Ehri, L. C. & Robbins, C. (in press). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy,Reading Research Quarterly.
Ehri, L. C. & Roberts, K. (1979). Do beginners learn printed words better in context or in isolation?,Child Development 50: 675–685.
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1980). Do beginners learn to read function words better in sentences or in lists?,Reading Research Quarterly, 15: 451–476.
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words?,Reading Research Quarterly 22: 47–65.
Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990).Phonological skills and learning to read. East Sussex (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hohn, W. E. & Ehri, L. C. (1983). Do alphabetic letters help prereaders acquire phonemic segmentation skill?,Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 752–762.
Jastak, J. F., Bijou, S. W. & Jastak, S. R. (1976).The wide range achievement test. Wilmington, DE: Guidance Associates of Delaware.
Jorm, A. F. & Schoknecht, C. (1981). Role of visual word-recognition checks in children's spelling,Australian Journal of Psychology 33: 393–403.
Liberman, I. Y., Rubin, H., Duques, S. & Carlisle, J. (1985) Linguistic abilities and spelling proficiency in kindergarteners and adult poor spellers, pp. 163–176, in: J. Kavanagh & D. Gray (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Myslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O. -P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 263–284.
Olson, R. K. (1985). Disabled reading processes and cognitive profiles, pp. 215–244, in: D. Gray & J. Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Olson, R., Foltz, G. & Wise, B. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 18: 93–99.
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences,Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339–348.
Olson, R. K. & Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback: An overview of the Colorado Remediation Project,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 00–00
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J. & Olson (in press). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review,Reading Research Quarterly.
Stanovich, K. (1980). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency,Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing,Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402–433.
Wagner, R. & Torgeson N, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Review 101: 192–212.
Wise, B. W. & Olson, R. K. (1991). Remediating reading disabilities, pp. 631–658, in: J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (eds.),Neuropsychological foundations in learning disabilities: A handbook of issues, methods, and practice. New York: Academic Press.
Wise, B. & Olson, R. K. (in press). What computerized speech can add to remedial reading, in: A. K. Syrdal, R. Bennett & S. Greenspan (eds.),Behavioral Aspects of Speech Technology: Theory and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., Anstett, M., Andrews, L., Terjak, M., Schneider, V., Kostuch, J. & Kriho, L. (1989). Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real world issues,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 21: 173–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wise, B.W., Olson, R.K. How poor readers and spellers use interactive speech in a computerized spelling program. Read Writ 4, 145–163 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027489