Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Government regulation of gambling advertising: Replacing vice prevention with consumer protection

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From 1895 to 1975, federal law forbade gambling advertising by use of the mail, interstate commerce, and the broadcast media. Congress exempted state lotteries in 1975 and charitable gambling (including casino games) in 1988. However, the Supreme Court requires a significant government interest, directly applied and narrowly tailored, in order to justify a commercial speech regulation. The exemptions for private charity casino games has arguably destroyed any constitutionally defensible government interest in restricting for-profit casinos. Casinos in new gambling jurisdictions (such as Iowa or Illinois) will probably push the hardest for an exemption for all legal gambling, as they have the most to gain from the freedom to advertise. Federal regulation of gambling advertising will fall to the Federal Trade Commission under prohibitions against “unfair or deceptive” trade practices. But as State regulations are not well developed even in states that permit casino gambling, there is a pressing need for new research to review state laws regulating gambling advertising and to propose a model statute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advertising Law Anthology, (1990). Volume 13. Washington, D.C.: International Library Incorporated.

  • Clotfelter, C.T., & Cook, P.J. (1989).Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Record. 100th Cong., 2d sess. May 10, 1988, p. H3073. May 25, 1988, p. H3643. October 14, 1988, pp. S16317–S16319. October 19, 1988, p. H10446.

  • Franklin, Ma. A., & Anderson, D.A. (1990).Cases and materials on mass media law, fourth edition. Westbury, New York: The Foundation Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Gaming Regulators Association, (1990). Gaming activity-1989: Preliminary report. Minneapolis, Minnesota: North American Gaming Regulators Association. October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosden, G.E., (1988).The law of advertising. Oakland, CA: Mathew Bender & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, I.N., (1985). Legal gambling: The right to advertise, in W. Eadington (ed.),The gambling studies, Vol. 2, pp. 1–32. Reno, Nevada: University of Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Minnesota, (1990). Lawful gambling. Report of Program Evaluation Division, Office of Legislative Auditor. January.

  • Tribe, L.H., (1988).American Constitutional Law, Second Edition. Mineola, New York: The Foundation Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. House of Representatives, (1987). Committee on the Judiciary. Rept. 100-557, Part 1.Lottery Advertising Clarification Act of 1988. 100th Cong., 1st sess., April 2, 1987. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Senate, (1990). Bryan introduces legislation to permit gaming advertising. Press release from office of Richard Bryan, May 1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 335 Waverly St., 94025, Menlo Park, CA

    Michael Rothman M.P.P. (Consultant)

  2. Department of Communication, Stanford University, USA

    Hollis Robbins M.P.P.

Authors
  1. Michael Rothman M.P.P.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hollis Robbins M.P.P.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothman, M., Robbins, H. Government regulation of gambling advertising: Replacing vice prevention with consumer protection. J Gambling Stud 7, 337–360 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023750

Keywords

Search

Navigation