Skip to main content
Log in

Voters and roll call voting: The effect on congressional elections

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject of this research is whether ideological preferences play a major role in explaining voters' refusal to reelect some members of the U.S. House of Representatives. If ideological control is important, one would expect to find a large difference between the voting record of a rejected incumbent and his or her replacement. In distinction, whenever voters must replace a congressman or congresswoman because that person had died in office or chose to run for higher office, the hypothesis of ideological tracking implies that the newly elected member of Congress will resemble his or her predecessor. The data confirm these hypotheses and show, as well, that ideological control exists within parties and not only between them; that the degree of voters' ideological control is as great over senior congressmen and congresswomen as over junior ones; and that voters' concern about ideology has increased over the last two decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Joseph, and William West (1981). “Voluntary Retirement, Incumbency and the Modern House.”Political Science Quarterly 96:279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack, and Donald McCrone (1970). “Pre-Adult Development of Political Party Identification in Western Democracies.”Comparative Political Studies 3:243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert (1978). “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.”American Journal of Political Science 27:511–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert, and Gerald Wright (1980). “Policy Representation of Constituency Interests.”Political Behavior 2:91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris (1974).Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris (1981). “Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections.”American Journal of Political Science 25:543–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary, and Samuel Kernell (1981).Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Richard Niemi (1968). “The Transmission of Political Values from Parent to Child.”American Political Science Review 62:169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannes, John, and John McAdams (1981). “The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election.”American Journal of Political Science 25:512–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, James, Donald Keenan, and Paul Rubin (1982). “A General Equilibrium Model of Congressional Voting.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, James, and Donald McCrone (1980). “Policy Salience and the Causal Structure of Representation.”American Politics Quarterly 8:139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman, Sidney Verba, and John Petrocik (1979).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, John (1970). “Party Identification and the Changing Role of Ideology in American Politics.”Midwest Journal of Political Science 14:25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomper, Gerald (1975).Voter's Choice. New York: Dodd, Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Lynda (1982). “Issue Representation in Congress.”Journal of Politics 44:658–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repass, David (1971). “Issue Salience and Party Choice.”American Political Science Review 65:389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward (1978).Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiannakis, Diana (1981). “The Grateful Electorate: Casework and Congressional Elections.”American Journal of Political Science 25:568–580.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, A., Robbins, M. Voters and roll call voting: The effect on congressional elections. Polit Behav 5, 377–389 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987562

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987562

Keywords

Navigation