Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is a qualitative investigation on the teaching-learning by analogy of complex curriculum concepts in natural and relevant environments, such as classrooms, to improve the ecological validity of the research itself. It aimed at exploring whether students' successful use of analogy in learning science was related a) to the level of their understanding of a specific analogy and b) to their metacognitive awareness of how the analogy was to be used and of the changes produced in their own conceptual structures. During the implementation of a biological curriculum unit, sixty 5th graders were engaged in understanding the ways in which the new concepts (concerning the human circulatory system) were similar to a familiar source (the mail delivery system) by detecting all the relations between the two systems and mapping the relevant information from the source to the target. Learners' preexisting mental models have been taken into account in order to examine their conceptual growth and change via the analogy. Qualitative data are presented for the analysis of elicited and spontaneous analogical inferences, based on structural and semantic similarities, as well as of the identification of where the analogy breaks down. Moreover, qualitative data also concern children's metacognitive awareness of the meaning and the purpose of the analogy, and their personal use of the analogy in changing initial conceptions. As hypothesized, results showed a high correlation between level of conceptual understanding of the new science topic, level of understanding of the analogy itself, and the effective use of the analogy in integrating the new information into the pre-existing conceptual structures. Some implications on the use of analogy for conceptual change are considered from an educational standpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaranti, G. (1991).Transfer analogico e processi di conoscenza. Una ricerca nella scuola elementare (Analogical transfer and knowledge processes. A study in the elementary school). Unpublished degree dissertation, University of Padova (Italy).

  • Arnaudin, M.W. & Mintzes, J.J. (1985). Students' alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system. A cross-age study.Science Education 69(5): 721–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaudin, M.W. & Mintzes, J.J. (1986). The cardiovascular system: Childrens' conceptions and misconceptions.Science and Children 23: 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.F., Vye, N.J. & Sherwood, R.D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told, in S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony, eds.,Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 470–497). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.E. & Clement, J. (1989). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer explanatory model construction.Instructional Science 18: 237–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery science, in R.N. Giere, ed.,Cognitive Models of Science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 129–186). Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Robin, A.F., Striley, J. & Fallshore, M. (1989).Possible Sources of Misunder-standing About the Circulatory System. Office of Educational Research and Improvement Milestone Report. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.H. & LaVancher, C. (submitted).Self-explanations Improve Conceptual Understanding.

  • Chi, M.T.H., Chiu, M. & de Leeuw, N. (1990).Learning in a Non-Physical Science Domain: The Human Circulatory System. Office of Educational Research and Improvement Milestone Report. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving.Cognitive Science 12: 563–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1991). Nonformal reasoning in experts and in science students: The use of analogies, extreme cases, and physical intuition, in J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins & J.W. Segal, eds.,Informal Reasoning and Education (pp. 345–362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J., Brown D.E. & Zietsman, A. (1989). Non all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students' intuitions.Internationaljournal of Science Education 11(5): 554–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science.Science Education 75: 649–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science 7: 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning, in S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony, eds.,Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology 12: 306–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology 15: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S.M. (1990). The teaching with analogies model, in K.D. Muth, ed.,Children's Comprehension of Text: Research into Practice (pp. 185–204). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S.M. (1991). Explaining science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies models, in S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany & B.K. Britton, eds.,The Psychology of Learning Science (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, M.A., Pascoe, H.T. & Simpson, M. (1984).An Investigation into Primary Pupils' Understanding of the Human Body. Aberdeen College of Education.

  • Halpern, D.F. (1987). Analogies as a critical thinking skill, in D.E. Berger, K. Pezdek & W.P. Banks, eds.,Applications of Cognitive Psychology: Problem Solving, Education, and Computing (pp. 75–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D.F., Hansen, C. & Riefer, D. (1990). Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory.Journal of Educational Psychology 82(2): 298–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, M.G. (1993).Students' Ideas About Their Conceptualization: Their Elicitation Through Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.

  • Hennessey, M.G. & Beeth, M.E. (1993).Students' Reflective Thoughts About Science Content: A Relationship to Conceptual Change Learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Holyoak, K.J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer, in G.H. Bower, ed.,The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 19 (pp. 59–87). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshua, S. & Dupin J.J. (1987). Taking into account student conceptions in instructional strategy: An example in physics.Cognition and Instruction 4: 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J. (1989). Teaching for analogical transfer as a means of improving problem-solving, thinking and learning.Instructional Science 18: 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. & O'Loughlin, M. (1988).The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason L., Semeraro R. & Sorzio P. (1991).The Process of Analogical Reasoning in Restructuring Scientific Knowledge. Paper presented at the 4th Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Turku (Finland), August 24–28.

  • Mayer, R.E. (1975). Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models.Journal of Educational Psychology 67(6): 725–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. & Bromage, B.K. (1980). Different recall protocols for technical texts due to advance organizers.Journal of Educational Psychology 72(2): 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J.J. (1984). Naive theories in biology: Children's concepts of the human body.School Science and Mathematics 84(7): 548–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J.J., Trowbridge, J.E., Arnaudin, M.W. & Wandersee J.H. (1991). Children's biology: Studies on conceptual development in the life sciences, in S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany & B.K. Britton, eds.,The Psychology of Learning Science (pp. 179–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis.Review of Educational Research 59(1): 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B.H. (1989). Remindings in learning and instruction, in S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony, eds.,Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (pp. 438–469). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K.J. (1989). Science education: It's not enough to ‘do’ or to ‘relate’.American Educator Winter 16–22 and 46–48.

  • Roth, K.J. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science, in B.F. Jones & L. Idol, eds.,Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction (pp. 139–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum-NCREL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. & Norman, D.A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three models of learning, in J.W. Cotton & R. Klatzky, eds.,Semantic Factors in Cognition (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schustack, M.W. & Anderson, J.R. (1979). Effects of analogy to prior knowledge on memory for new information.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 565–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.R.J. (1984). Instructing with analogies.Journal of Educational Psychology 76(3): 513–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R. (1991). Using analogy to overcome misconceptions about conservation.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(4): 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepich, D.A. & Newby, T.J. (1988). Analogical instruction within the information processing paradigm: Effective means to facilitate learning.Instructional Science 17(2): 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1977).Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1982). Reasoning, problem solving, and intelligence, in R.J. Sternberg, ed.,Handbook of Human Intelligence (pp. 225–307). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Analogy, explanation, and education.Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(6): 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D.F., Harrison, A. & Venville, G. (1993, April).Using an Analogical Teaching Approach to Engender Conceptual Change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, G A.

  • Vosniadou, S. (1991a). Conceptual development in astronomy, in S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany & B.K. Britton, eds.,The Psychology of Learning Science (pp. 149–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1991b). Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring: Lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy.Journal of Curriculum Studies 23(3): 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W.F. (1992). Mental models of the earth.Cognitive Psychology 24(4): 535–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A., eds. (1989).Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. & Schommer, M. (1988). Explanatory analogies can help children acquire information from expository text.Journal of Educational Psychology 80(4): 524–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J. & Arnaudin, M.W. (1989). Biology from the learners' viewpoint: A content analysis of the research.School Science and Mathematics 89(8): 654–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C.E. & Underwood, V.L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning, in J.W. Segal, S.F. Chipman & R. Glaser, eds.,Thinking and Learning Skills. Relating Instruction to Research., Vol.1 (pp. 241–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T. & Gunstone, R.F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change.International Journal of Science Education 11 (Special Issue): 577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M.C. (1985). Learning science by generating new conceptions for old ideas, in L. West & A. Pines, eds.,Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change (pp. 259–266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, K.B. & Di Vesta, F.J. (1991). Instructional analogies and conceptual misrepresentations.Journal of Educational Psychology 83(2): 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Padova, Italy

    Lucia Mason

Authors
  1. Lucia Mason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, L. Cognitive and metacognitive aspects in conceptual change by analogy. Instr Sci 22, 157–187 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892241

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00892241

Keywords

Search

Navigation