Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual-learning systems as conservative structures: Is economy an attractor?

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is discussed whether information-processing or connectionist models might explain the law ofPrägnanz under constraints resulting from a physical interpretation of these models. An information-processing approach is contrasted with thermodynamics and, finally, an alternative approach more directly inspired by Gestalt is discussed. It is argued that this model could be physically realized with relatively moderate requirements on the substrate in terms of information-processing resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buffart, H. (1986). Gestalt qualities, memory structure, and minimum principles. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.),Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 189–204). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1983). Précis of Knowledge and the Flow of Information.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, W. (1988). Has the time come to rehabilitate Gestalt theory?Psychological Research, 50, 2–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschaldt, K. (1929). Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren: II.Psychologische Forschung, 12, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthke, J., Räder, E., Caruso, M., & Schmidt K.-D. (1990). Entwicklung eines adaptiven computergestützten Lemtests auf der Basis der strukturellen Informationstheorie.Diagnostika, (in press).

  • Hendler, J. A. (1989). Marker-passing over micro-features: Towards a hybrid symbolic/connectionist model.Cognitive Science, 13, 79–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, M. (1984). Isomorphism: Setting the record straight.Psychological Research, 46, 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986). Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, W. (1989). Über menschliches Denken — Denken als Ordnungsbildung.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 197, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, C. van (1989). PDP and Gestalt, an integration?Psychological Research, 50, 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, C. van (1990). Indeterminacy of the isomorphism heuristic.Psychological Research, 52, 1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, C. van, & Buffart, H. (1989). Facilitation of retrieval by perceptual structure.Psychological Research, 50, 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, C. van, Buffart, H., & van der Vegt, J. (1988). Sequence influence on the organization of meaningless serial stimuli: Economy after all.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen, L. van, & Smitsman, A. (1991). Perzeption von Handlungsmöglichkeiten und die Entwicklung von Werkzeuggebrauch im frühen Kindesalter. In F. J. Monks & G. Lehwald (Eds.),Exploration, Kompetenz, Begabung. Beiträge zur frühkindlichen Entwicklung. München: Reinhardt (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg, E. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns.American Journal of Psychology, 84, 307–349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of “Einstellung”.Psychological Monographs, 54, (Whole No. 248).

  • Maas, H. L. J. van der, Verschure, P. F. M. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1990). A note on chaotic behavior in simple neural networks.Neural Networks, (in press).

  • Newell, A. (1980). Physical symbol systems.Cognitive Science, 4, 135–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, J. S., & Prigogine, I. (1977).Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems: From dissipative structures to order through fluctuations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribram, K. (1984). What is iso and what is morphic in isomorphism?Psychological Research, 46, 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1980).From being to becoming: Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Fransisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984).Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. (1983).The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (1990). Treating connectionism properly: Reflections on Smolensky.Psychological Research, 52, 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1978). Expansion of the functional visual field and context skipping in a continuous search task.Psychological Research, 40, 113–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1985). From the icon to the symbol. In R.E. Innes (Ed.),Semiotics, an introductory anthology (pp. 275–291). London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, J., Buffart, H. J. F. M., & van Leeuwen, C. C. (1988). The “structural memory”: A network model for human perception of serial objects.Psychological Research, 50, 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, F. (1922). Über die Veränderung von Vorstellungen.Psychologische Forschung, 1, 333–373.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Leeuwen, C. Perceptual-learning systems as conservative structures: Is economy an attractor?. Psychol. Res 52, 145–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877522

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877522

Keywords

Navigation