Abstract
The rationale for the development of a Repertory-Grid based quality of life assessment (QOL) is described. The emergent scale, the SmithKline Beecham Quality of Life Scale (SBQOL) utilizes 23 predetermined constructs and three fixed elements: self now, ideal self and sick self. Inclusion of the latter two elements provides a personal frame of reference for the individual and recognizes the highly idiosyncratic and subjective nature of the experience which constitutes quality of life. A study of the validity and reliability of the SBQOL was conducted in 129 patients presenting to their GP with either major depression or generalized anxiety disorder, as defined by DSM III R. Patients were treated at the discretion of their GP and followed over a period of 12 weeks with assessments of treatment efficacy being performed at 6 weeks and 12 weeks in parallel with administration of the SBQOL. The results from co-administration of standard efficacy measures such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) with the SBQOL, provided good evidence of construct validity. Evidence in support of the concurrent validity of the SBQOL was provided by co-administration of the Sickness Impact Profile and General Health Questionnaire (external criteria) with the SBQOL scale. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high. No obvious advantage was conferred by the use of principal components analysis from the Flexigrid software package in contrast to a simple arithmetical procedure for computing interelement distances. It is concluded that the SBQOL provides a valid, reliable and practicable approach to the assessment of quality of life in patients with affective disorder.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
JoyceCRB. Report from European Standard for Clinical Trials (ESCT) meeting in Strasbourg 23–24 May 1991, on issues of concern in the standardization and harmonization of drug trials in Europe. Health-Related Quality of Life Session.Quality of Life Newsletter 1992;3: 10.
Sartorius, N. A WHO method for the assessment of health related quality of life (WHQOL). In: Walker SR, Rosser RM, eds.Quality of Life Assessment: Key issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 201–207 (in press).
HuntSM, McEwenJ, McKennaSP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians & epidemiologists.J Roy Coll General Pract 1985;35: 185–188.
BergnerM, BobbitRA, CanterWB, GilsonBS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development & final revision of a health status measure.Med Care 1981;19: 787–805.
Kelly GA.The Psychology of Personal Constructs 1995. Norton.
Smith M. An introduction to repertory grids —part one.Graduate Management Research, 1986.
DunbarGC, StokerMJ, HodgesTCP, BeaumontG. The development of SBQOL: a unique scale for measuring quality of life.Br J Health Economics 1992;2: 65–74.
Eysenck HJ. The Measurement of Personality. Baltimore University: Park Press. 1976.
TschudiF.Flexigrid, v 5.1 Copyright 1990. University of Oslo, Norway.
LittleAD. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of pharmaceuticals increasingly part of cost-containment strategies.Trends in the Making 1992;3: 1.
MillerL, DaltonM, VestalR, PerkinsJG, LyonG. Quality of Life I, Methodological and regulatory/scientific aspects.J Clin Res & Drug Devel 1989;3: 117–128.
KarnofskyDA, BurchenalJH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacleodCM, ed.Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949: 191–205.
GriecoA, LongCJ. Investigation of the Karnofsky performance status as a measure of quality of life.Health Psychology 1984;3: 129–142.
GilsonBS, GilsonJS, BergnerM, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: development of an outcome measure of health.Am J Public Health 1975;65: 1304.
ReadJL, QuinnRJ, HoeferMA. Measuring overall health: an evaluation of three important approaches.J Chron Disorder 1987;40 suppl 1: 7S-21S.
MackenzieCR, CharlsonME, DiGioiaD, KelleyK. Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment.J Chron Dis 1986;39: 429–438.
BechP. Measurement of psychological distress and well-being.Psychother Psychosom 1990;54: 77–89.
AaronsonNK. Quality of life assessment in clinical trial: methodologic issues.Controlled Clinical Trials 1989;10: 195S-208S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoker, M.J., Dunbar, G.C. & Beaumont, G. The SmithKline Beecham ‘quality of life’ scale: a validation and reliability study in patients with affective disorder. Qual Life Res 1, 385–395 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704433
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704433