Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants

V. Habitat selection, community structure and speciation

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Early models of hostplant exploitation by phytophagous insects suffer from unwarranted assumptions and may not be generally applicable. Wordmodels of the co-evolutionary approach may assume unwarranted evolutionary stability in ‘strategic’ explanations, whilst mathematical models derived from earlier optimal-diet studies are unrealistic and unwieldy. A simple arithmetic model synthesises these two approaches, using the two parameters of foodplant suitability and availability. Hostplant use by the butterfly Anthocharis cardamines, previously thought to be maladaptively polyphagous, is shown to be optimal under prevailing conditions of short search time. The predictions of the model for hostplant use and community structure of butterflies and other phytophagous insects are tested and, in large part, corroborated. Monophagy and monophagic forms of oligophagy are shown to be favoured by: long adult lifespan; low search costs to females; search images (Whether visual or olfactory); batch-laying of eggs; high differential in foodplant suitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson WW (1978) Resource partitioning in Passion Vine butterflies. Evolution 32:493–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden SR (1970) American white butterflies (Pieridae) and English foodplants. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 25:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1975) Coevolution of Pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. I. The relative quality of available resources. Oecologia 20:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1977a) II. The distribution of eggs on potential foodplants. Evolution 31:568–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1977b) The effects of introduced mustards (Cruciferae) on some native North American cabbage butterflies (Lep. Pier.) Athala 5:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1980) Studies on the biology of the butterflies Anthocharis cardamines (L.) and Pieris napi (L.), in relation to speciation in Pierinae. Ph.D. Thessis. University of Durham, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1981) Coevolution of Pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. III. Anthocharis cardamines (L.) survival, development and oviposition on different hostplants. Oecologia 51:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1982) IV. Hostplant apparency and Anthocharis cardamines oviposition. Oecologia 52:258–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Raven H (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18:586–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE (1975) Ecological consequences of a co-evolved mutualism between butterflies and plants. In: Gilbert and Raven (eds) Coevolution of Animals and Plants. Texas, University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert LE, Singer MC (1975) Butterfly ecology. Annu Rev Ecol System 6:365–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks KL (1974) Mustard oil glucosides: feeding stimulants for adult Cabbage Flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Col. Chrys.). Ann Entomol Soc of Am 67:261–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins LG, Riley ND (1975) A field guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe, 3rd ed. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovanitz W (1963) The relation of Pieris virginiensis Edw. to P. napi L. J Res Lepidoptera 1:124–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1978) On optimal oviposition behaviour in phytophagous insects. Theor Popul Biol 14:350–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RE (1977) Movement patterns and egg distributions in cabbage butterflies. J Anim Ecol 46:195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer A (1976) Glucosinolates in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan JG, Mac Leod AJ, Jones BMG (eds) The biology and chemistry of the cruciferae. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R, MacArthur RH (1969) An hypothesis to explain the incidence of monophagy. Ecology 50:910–911

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1977) Fitness, survival and optimality. In: Horn, Mitchell, Stairs (eds) Analysis of ecological systems. Ohio State University Press

  • Lorkovic Z (1968) Systematisch — genetische und ökologische Besonderheiten von Pieris ergane Hbn. (Lep. Pier.). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 41:233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization Theory in evolution. Annu Rev Ecol System 9:35–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair KSS, McEwen FL, Alex JF (1973) Oviposition and development of Hylemya brassicae Bouche on cruciferous weeds. Proc Entomol Soc Ontario 104:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JB (1964) Factors influencing clutch size and chick growth in the North Atlantic Gannet (Sula bassana). Ibis 166:63–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman E (1869) An illustrated natural history of British butterflies and moths. W.H. Allen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JK (1978) Hostplant discrimination within Cruciferae: feeding responses of four leaf beetles (Col. Chrys.) to glucosinolates, curcubitains and cardenolides. Entomologia Exp Applicata 24:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki N (1979) Comparative population studies on three Pieris butterflies, P. rapae, P. melete and P. napi living in the same area. 1. Res Popul Ecol 20:278–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen B (1954) Egg-laying and habitat selection in some Pieris species. Entomologisk Tidskrift 75:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1974) On the theory or optimal diets. Am Nat 108:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1979) Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in 3 related butterflies. Ecology 60:503–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman J, Chew FS (1980) Phytochemical correlates of herbivory in a community of native and naturalized Cruciferae. Biochem System Ecol 8:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriber JM (1973) Latitudinal gradients in larval feeding specialization of the world Papilionidae (Lepidoptera). Psyche 80:355–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal UK, Vjagir R (1977) Plants natural defences in Cruciferae and Tropaeolaceae against mustard sawfly Athalia proxima Klug. Indian J Ecol 4:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AM (1971) Occurrence of a latent polyphenism in Pieris virginiensis (Lep. Pier.). Entomol News 82:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AM, Carde R (1970) Habitat selection and Competition among sibling species of satyrid butterflies. Evolution 24:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1979) Optimal diet: the relative importance of the different parameters. Am Nat 113:460–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC (1971) Evolution of foodplant preference in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Evolution 25:383–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley J (1978) Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora. Science 201:745–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML (1979) The role of chemotactile stimuli in the oviposition preference of Colias butterflies. Oecologia 39:79–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Takata N (1961) Studies on the host preference of common cabbage butterfly. XII. Japanese J Ecol 11:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Varga Z (1967) Population studien über Pieris bryoniae O. in Karpathen becken. Acta Biol Debrecina 5:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  • White RR, Singer MC (1974) Geographical distribution of hostplant choice in Euphydryas editha (Nymph). J Lepidopterists Soc 28:103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1973) Hostplant suitability and the mechanism of host selection in larvae of Papilio machaon L. Entomol Exp Applicata 16:232–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1974a) The concept of oligophagy and the natural habitats and host plants of Papilio machaon L. Entomol Scand 5:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1974b) Oviposition preference in Papilio machaon in relation to the hostplants of the larvae. Entomol Exp Applicata 17:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1975) The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia 18:185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Ahrberg C (1978) Hostplants, nectar source plants and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines. Oikos 31:169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM (1978) Spatial properties of niche separation among Eueides and Dryas butterflies in Costa Rica. J New York Entomol Soc 86:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwolfer H (1974) Speciation and ecological differentiation in phytophagous insects. Dtsch Zool Ges 67:394–401

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Steven P. Courtney

    Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, England

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Durham, England

    Steven P. Courtney

Authors
  1. Steven P. Courtney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Courtney, S.P. Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. Oecologia 54, 101–107 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541116

Keywords

Search

Navigation