Summary
Net photosynthesis was measured under field conditions in Maryland, U.S.A. on several days in the C4 species Amaranthus hybridus and Portulaca oleracea, and the C3 species Chenopodium album. Two similar fully exposed canopy leavesof the same specieswere measured each day, following ambient patterns of air temperature and irradiance. One leaf of the pair was exposed to air at the ambient humidity, while the other leaf was exposed to wetter air, such that the leaf to air water vapor pressure difference was 0.5 to 0.6 of that of the leaf at ambient humidity. Daily totals of net photosynthesis were consistently higher for leaves at increased humidity in C. album, with a mean ratio of 1.17. In contrast, daily totals of net photosynthesis in the two C4 species were at most 1.06 times higher for leaves at increased humidity, with a mean ratio of 1.03. Leaf conductance to water vapor increased as water vapor pressure differences decreased in C. album and A. hybridus. In A. hybridus increased sub-stomatal CO2 concentrations resulting from increased humidity only slightly increased net photosynthesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunce JA (1981) Comparative responses of leaf conductance to humidity in single attached leaves. J Exp Bot 32:629–634
Bunce JA (1982a) Low humidity effects on photosynthesis in single leaves of C4 plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 54:233–235
Bunce JA (1982b) Photosynthesis at ambient and elevated humidity over a growing season in soybean. Photo Res (in press)
Dubbe DR, Farquhar GD, Raschke K (1978) Effect of abscisic acid on the gain of the feedback loop involving carbon dioxide and stomata. Pl Physiol 62:413–417
Fuchs M, Schulze E-D, Fuchs MI (1977) Spatial distribution of photosynthetic capacity and performance in a mountain spruce forest of northern Germany. Oecologia (Berlin) 29:329–340
Lange OL, Schulze E-D, Kappen L, Buschbom U, Evenari M (1975) Photosynthesis of desert plants as influenced by internal and external factors. In Gates DM, Schmerl RD (eds) Perspectives in Biophysical Ecology. Ecological Studies. v. 12. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 121–143
Ludlow MM (1980) Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaption of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. J Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 123–138
Mauney JR, Guinn G, Fry KE, Hesketh JD (1979) Correlation of photosynthetic carbon dioxide uptake and carbohydrate accumulation in cotton, soybean, sunflower, and sorghum. Photosynthetica 13:260–266
Pearcy RW (1977) Acclimation of photosynthetic and respiratory carbon dioxide exchange to growth temperature in Atriplex lentiformis (torr) Wats. Pl Physiol 59:795–799
Schulze E-D (1970) Der CO2-Gaswechsel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Abhängigkeit von dem Klimafaktoren im Freiland. Flora 159:177–232
Watts WR, Neilson RE, Jarvis PG (1976) Photosynthesis in sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). J Appl Ecol 13:623–638
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bunce, J.A. Differential sensitivity to humidity of daily photosynthesis in the field in C3 and C4 species. Oecologia 57, 262–265 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379588
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379588