Abstract
We compared the average body size (wing span) of Finnish geometrid moth species in relation to their degree of polyphagy and quality of food. The first hypothesis, originally constructed for mammals and birds, states that smaller species should more often be specialists than large species, because of the different relationships between body size and home range size, and body size and daily energy requirements. According to the second hypothesis, smaller species should feed more often on herbs than do larger species, because of the different defence mechanisms of herbs and woody plants. The results support both of these hypotheses. Specialist species are smaller than oligophagous or polyphagous species, and small species concentrate on herbs. We conclude that quality and quantity of food resources may explain the pattern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bermardo J (1993) Determinants of maturation in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 166–173
Blackburn TM, Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1990) Species number, population density and body size relationships in natural communities. J Anim Ecol 59: 335–345
Blueweiss L, Fox H, Kudzma V, Nakashima D, Peters R, Sams S (1978) Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia 37: 257–272
Brattsten LB (1979) Biochemical defense mechanisms in herbivores against plant allelochemicals. In: Rosenthal GA, Janzen DH (eds) Herbivores. Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 199–270
Brown JH, Maurer BA (1986) Body size, ecological dominance and Cope's rule. Nature 324: 248–250
Brown JH, Maurer BA (1989) Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents. Science 243: 1145–1150
Currie DJ, Fritz JT (1993) Global patterns of animal abundance and species energy use. Oikos 67: 56–68
Feeny PP (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defence. Recent Adv Phytochem 10: 1–40
Hämet-Ahti L, Suominen J, Ulvinen T, Uotila P, Vuokko S. (1984) Retkeilykasvio (The field flora of Finland). Suomen Luonnonsuojelun Tuki Oy, Helsinki
Harvey PH, Bradbury JW (1991) Sexual selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 203–233
Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Honěk A (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66: 483–492
Hutchinson GE, MacArthur RH (1959) A theoretical model of size distributions among species of animals. Am Nat. 93: 117–125
Lawton JH (1989) What is the relationship between population density and body size in animals? Oikos 55: 429–434
Lindroth RL (1991) Differential toxicity of plant allelochemicals to insects: roles of enzymatic detoxication systems. In: Bernays E (ed) Insect-plant interactions, vol III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–33
Mikkola K, Jalas J, Peltonen O, (1985) Suomen perhoset, Mittarit I (Lepidoptera of Finland, Geometridae I). Suomen perhostutkijain seura, Tampere
Mikkola K, Jalas J, Peltonen O. (1989) Suomen perhoset, Mittarit II [Lepidoptera of Finland, Geometridae II]. Suomen perhostutkijain seura. Recallmed Oy, Hanko
Miller WE (1977) Wing measure as a size index in Lepidoptera: The family Olethreutidae. Ann Entomol Soc Am 70: 253–256
Niemelä P, Hanhimäki S, Mannila R (1981) The relationship of adult size in noctuid moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to breadth of diet and growth form of host plants. Ann Entomol Fenn 47: 17–20
Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reiss MJ (1989) The allometry of growth and reproduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rhoades DF (1985) Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory. Am Nat 125: 205–238
Rhoades DF, Cates RG (1976) Toward a general theory of plant herbivore chemistry. Recent Adv of Phytochemistry 10: 168–213
Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) Scaling. Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Scriber JM, Feeny P (1979) Growth of herbivorous caterpillars in relation to feeding specialization and to the growth form of their food plants. Ecology 60: 829–850
Varis V, Jalava J, Kyrki J (1987) Check-list of Finnish Lepidoptera. Not Entomol 67: 49–118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindström, J., Kaila, L. & Niemelä, P. Polyphagy and adult body size in geometrid moths. Oecologia 98, 130–132 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341463
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341463