Skip to main content
Log in

Cytotaxonomy of antarctic teleosts of the Pagothenia/Trematomus complex (Nototheniidae, Perciformes)

  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The interspecific relationships and taxonomy of 12 antarctic coastal Nototheniids (the Pagothenia/ Trematomus complex) are still under discussion. Here we present karyological data on eight species in hope that further cytogenetic data can help to clarify phylogenetic problems. Pagothenia bernacchii (2n = 48) has a generalized karyotype which has not developed heterochromosomes. P. hansoni, P. borchgrevinki and Trematomus newnesi share very similar karyotypes with 2n = 46 for females and 2n = 45 for males. The difference between sexes is probably due to the development of a multiple sex-chromosome system with a neo-Y, typical of males, which originated from a centric fusion of an autosome (now X2) with an undifferentiated Y. The chromosome morphology of the three species seems to be related to that of P. bernacchii. T. nicolai (2n = 58, 57) has a karyotype numerically and morphologically divergent from that of the above species; T. nicolai males may have developed a neo-Y through a tandem translocation. T. pennellii (2n = 32), T. loennbergii (2n = 28; 2n = 30 in a single female) and T. eulepidotus (2n = 24) show karyotypes with progressively fewer chromosomes but with an increasing number of large, bi-armed chromosomes. Such a “symmetrization” process is generally found in advanced poikilothermic Vertebrates and the three species of Trematomus could therefore be considered as karyologically derived. However, parallelism in the karyotype differentiation producing convergence in the chromosome morphology of distantly related species cannot yet be excluded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen NC (1984) Genera and subfamilies of the family Nototheniidae (Pisces, Perciformes) from the Antarctic and Subantarctic. Steentrupia 10:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriashev AP (1965) A general review of the Antarctic fish fauna. In: Van Oye P, Van Mieghem J (eds) Biogeography and ecology of Antarctica, Monogr Biol. Junk, The Hague, pp 491–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriashev AP, Jakubowski M (1971) Morphological grounds for generic separation of the Antarctic broadhead fishes (Trematomus borchgrevinki Boulenger and T. brachysoma Pappenheim) and a new status of the genus Pagothenia Nichols et Lamonte (Nototheniidae). Zool Zhurn 50:1041–1055 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balushkin AV (1982) Classification of Trematominae fishes of the Antarctic. In: Biology of shelf zones of the world occeans 2, izd. DVNTs SSSR, Vladivostok, pp 9–10 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balushkin AV (1984) Morphological bases of the systematics and phylogeny of the nototheniid fishes. USSR Academy of Sciences, Leningrad, 140 pp

  • Carbone P, Vitturi R, Catalane E, Macaluso M (1987) Chromosome sex determination and Y-autosome fusion in Blennius tentacularis Brunnich, 1765 (Pisces, Blennidae). J Fish Biol 31:597–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A (1988) Seasonality in the Antarctic marine environment. Comp Biochem Physiol [B] 90:461–473

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt HH (1964) A redescription of Pagothenia antarctica, with remarks on the genus Trematomus (Pisces, Nototheniidae). Copeia 1964:683–686

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt HH (1971) Coastal and deep-water benthic fishes of the Antarctic. Antarct. Map Folio Ser, Am Geogr Soc 15:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt HH, Heemstra PC, Gon O (1990) In: Gon O, Heemstra PC (eds) Fishes of the Southern Ocean, Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown, pp 279–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Doussau de Bazignan M, Ozouf-Costaz C (1985) Une technique d'analyse chromosomique appliquée à sept espèces de poissons antarctiques. Cybium 9:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JT (1991) Evolution and diversification of Antarctic Notothenioid fishes. Am Zool 31:93–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia E, Alvarez MC, Thode G (1987) Chromosome relationships in the genus Blennius (Blenniidae, Perciformes): C-banding patterns suggest two karyoevolutional pathways. Genetica 72:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR (1979) Cytogenetics. Fish Physiol 8:353–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Hureau JC (1985) Notothenioidei. In: Fisher W, Hureau JC (eds) FAO Species identification sheets for fishery purposes, Southern Ocean (CCAMLR Convention Fishing Areas 58 and 88), FAO, Rome, pp 244–284 and 323–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallman KD (1984) A new look at sex determination in Poeciliid fishes. In: Turner BJ (ed) Evolutionary genetics of fishes. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 95–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position of chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A (1975) Chromosome evolution in the Caudate Amphibia Evol Biol 8:339–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A (1990) Cytogenetics and the problem of Lissamphibian relationships. In: Olmo E (ed) Cytogenetics of amphibians and reptiles, ALS Birkhäuser, Basel Boston Berlin, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A, Hureau JC, Olmo E, Ozouf-Costaz C, Pisano E, Stanyon R (1992) A multiple sex-chromosome system in Antarctic ice-fishes. Polar Biol 11:655–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S (1974) Protochordata, cyclostomata and Pisces. In: John B (ed) Animal Cytogenetics, Vol 4, Chap 1. Borntraeger, Berlin Stuttgart, pp 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojima Y (1983) Fish cytogenetics. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A (eds) Chromosomes in evolution of eukaryotic groups 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, pp 111–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozouf-Costaz C, Doussau de Bazignan M (1987) Chromosome relationships among 15 species of Nototheniiade. In: Kullander SO, Fernholm B (eds) Proc Vth Congr Europ Ichthyol, Stockholm. Swed Mus Nat Hist, pp 413–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda I, Feichtinger W, Schmid M, Schröder JH, Epplen JT, (1990) Simple repetitive sequences are associated with differentiation of the sex-chromosomes in the guppy fish. J. Mol. Evol. 30:456–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan VN, Gomes V, Suzuki H (1986) Estudos citogeneticos de peixes antarticos. I. Cariotipos de Notothenia gibberifrons (Lonnberg 1905), Trematomus bernacchii (Boulenger 1902) e T. hansoni (Boulenger 1902) (Perciformes, Notothenioidei). An Acad Brasil Ciencias [Suppl] 58:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Prirodina VP (1986) Karyotypes of Cottoperca gobio (Bovichthyidae, Notothenioidei) as compared to karyotypes of other Notothenioidei (in Russian). USSR Acad Sci, Proc Zool Inst Leningrad 153:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Prirodina VP, Neyelov AV (1984) Chromosome complements of two fish species of the genus Notothenia (family Nototheniidae) from the West Antarctic (in Russian). T Zool Inst 127:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, Steinlein C, Nanda I, Epplen JT (1990) Chromosome banding in Amphibia. In: Olmo E (ed) Cytogenetics of amphibians and reptiles, ALS Birkhäuser, Basel Boston Berlin, pp 21–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sola L, Cataudella S, Capanna E (1981) New developments in vertebrate cytotaxonomy. II. Karyology of bony fishes: a review. Genetica 54:285–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1966) Chromosomal variations and evolution. Science 152:1463–1469

    Google Scholar 

  • Thode G, Giles V, Alvarez MC (1985) Multiple chromosome polymorphism in Gobius paganellus (Teleostei, Perciformes). Heredity 54:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitturi R, Catalane E (1988) Karyotypic variability associated with Robertsonian fusion in two species of the family Ophiidae (Pisces, Perciformes). Boll Zool 55:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitturi R, Catalano E (1989) Multiple chromosome polymorphism in the gobiid fish Gobius niger jozo L. 1758 (Pisces, Gobiidae). Cytologia (Tokio) 54:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd edn Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, 961 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morescalchi, A., Pisano, E., Stanyon, R. et al. Cytotaxonomy of antarctic teleosts of the Pagothenia/Trematomus complex (Nototheniidae, Perciformes). Polar Biol 12, 553–558 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236979

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236979

Keywords

Navigation