Abstract
Paglin and Fogarty (1972) proposed a correct conceptual view of equitable property tax assessment, but attempts to find an empirical test of their model have become mired in technical issues. The new empirical test proposed here is based on the notion that the market value of an individual property is essentially unobservable.
Empirical results for 52 towns in Connecticut show that the new model (a 2SLS procedure) removes a substantial part of the biases present in other tests. Moreover, the 2SLS procedure provides a method for removing the time trend from sales prices. Thus, sales prices can be adjusted to the date of assessed value allowing evaluation of assessment practices as opposed to assessment lags. This refines previous approaches, and it substantially expands the number of transactions that can be used to evaluate equity in property tax assessment practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, M.S. “Fitting of Straight Lines When Both Variables are Subject to Error.” Biometrics (September 1949), 207–212.
Bell, Earl J. “Adminstrative Inequity and Property Assessment: The Case For the Traditional Approach.” Property Tax Journal (June 1984), 123–131.
Berry, Brian and Bednarz, Robert S. “A Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor?” Land Economics LI (February 1975), 21–40.
Bryan, Thomas B. and Colwell, Peter F.“Housing Price Indexes.” In: C.F. Sirmans, ed., Research in Real Estate. Vol. 2, pp. 57–84.
Cannaday, Roger E.; Stunard, Eugene W.; and Sunderman, Mark A. “Property Tax Assessment: Measures and Tests of Uniformity Applied to Chicago Condominiums.” Illinois Business Review 44 (April 1987), 9–12.
Cheng, Pao Lun. “The Common Level of Assessment in Property Taxation.” National Tax Journal 23 (1970), 50–65.
Cheng, Pao Lun. “Property Taxation, Assessment Performance, and Its Measurement.” Public Finance 29 (1974), 268–284.
Edelstein, Robert H. “An Appraisal of Residential Property Tax Regressivity.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (November 1979), 753–768.
Gaston, Parke. “Redeeming the Assessment Ratio Equity Test.” Property Tax Journal (September 1984), 181–198.
Judge, George G.; Griffiths, W.E.; Hill, R. Carter; Lutkepohl, Helmut; and Lee, Tsoung-Chao. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
Kennedy, Peter. “On an Unfair Appraisal of Vertical Equity in Real Estate Assessment.” Economic Inquiry XXII (April 1984), 287–289.
Kochin, Levis A. and Parks, Richard W. “Vertical Equity in Real Estate Assessment: A Fair Appraisal.” Economic Inquiry XX (October 1982), 511–532.
Madansky, Albert. “The Fitting of Straight Lines When Both Variables Are Subject to Error.” American Statistical Association Journal 54 (March 1959), 173–205.
Paglin, Morton and Fogarty, Michael. “Equity and the Property Tax: A New Conceptual Focus.” National Tax Journal 25 (1972), 557–575.
Reinmuth, James E. “The Measurement of Vertical Inequities in Assessment Practice”. In: Analyzing Assessment Equity. Chicago: International Association of Assessing Officers, 1977, 47–68.
Wald, A. “The Fitting of Straight Lines if Both Variables are Subject to Errors.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 32 (1940), 1040–1062.
Wurtzbach, Charles H. and Miles, Mike E. Modern Real Estate, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clapp, J.M. A new test for equitable real estate tax assessment. J Real Estate Finan Econ 3, 233–249 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216188
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216188