Abstract
Hubel and Wiesel (1977) suggested that ocular dominance and orientation columns in the macaque monkey striate cortex might be bands of uniform width that intersected orthogonally. They pointed out that if this were the case, there would be an equal allocation of cells of different orientation preference to each eye and to each point in visual space. However, orientation and ocular dominance columns have a more complex structural organization than is implied by this model: for example, iso-orientation domains do not intersect ocular dominance stripes at right angles and the two columnar systems have different periodicities. This raises the question as to how well the striate cortex manages to allocate equal numbers of neurons of different orientation preference to each eye and to each region of visual space, a factor referred to here as coverage. This paper defines a measure of uniformity of coverage, c′, and investigates its dependence on several different parameters of columnar organisation. Calculations were done first using a simplified one-dimensional model of orientation and ocular dominance columns and were then repeated using more realistic two-dimensional models, generated with the algorithms described in the preceding paper (Swindale 1991). Factors investigated include the relative periodicities of the two columnar systems, the size of the cortical point image, the width of orientation tuning curves, whether columns are spatially anisotropic or not, and the role of the structural relationships between columns described by Blasdel and Salama (1986). The results demonstrate that coverage is most uniform when orientation hypercolumns are about half the size of ocular dominance hypercolumns. Coverage is most uneven when the hypercolumns are the same size, unless they are related in the way described by Blasdel and Salama, in which case coverage gets only slightly worse as the size ratio (ori/od) increases above 0.5. The minimum diameter of cortical point image that ensures reasonably uniform coverage is about twice the size of an ocular dominance hypercolumn i.e. about 1.5–2.0 mm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD (1967) The neural mechanisms of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 193:327–342
Blakemore C, Fiorentini A, Maffei L (1972) A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond) 226:725–749
Blakemore CB, Garey LJ, Vital-Durand F (1981) Orientation preferences in the monkey's visual cortex. J. Physiol (Lond) 319:78P
Blasdel GG, Salama G (1986) Voltage-sensitive dyes reveal a modular organization in monkey striate cortex. Nature 321:579–585
Cynader MS, Swindale NV, Matsubara JA (1987) Functional topography in cat area 18. J Neurosci 7:1401–1413
Diao Y-C, Jia W-G, Swindale NV, Cynader MS (1990) Functional organization of the cortical 17/18 border region in the cat. Exp Brain Res 79:271–282
Dow BM, Snyder AZ, Vautin RG, Bauer R (1981) Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 44:213–228
Hong X, Regan D (1989) Visual field defects for unidirectional and oscillatory motion in depth. Vision Res 29:809–819
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 195:215–243
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974a) Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. J Comp Neurol 158:267–294
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1974b) Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: a parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor. J Comp Neurol 158:295–306
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1977) Functional architecture of macaque monkey striate cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 198:1–59
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, LeVay S (1977) Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 278:131–163
Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, Stryker MP (1978) Anatomical demonstration of orientation columns in macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 177:361–380
Jiang B, Levi DM (1991) Spatial-interval discrimination in two-dimensions: effect of eccentricity. Invest Ophthalmol 32:1269
LeVay S, Connolly M, Houde J, Van Essen DC (1985) The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 5:486–501
Livingstone MS, Hubel DH (1984) Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex. J Neurosci 4:309–356
Löwel S, Singer W (1987) The pattern of ocular dominance columns in flat mounts of the cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 68:661–666
Löwel S, Freeman B, Singer W (1987) Topographic organization of the orientation column system in large flat-mounts of the cat visual cortex: a 2-deoxyglucose study. J Comp Neurol 155:401–415
Michael CR (1981) Columnar organization of color cells in monkey's striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 46:587–604
Nelson JI, Kato H, Bishop PO (1977) Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 40:260–283
Payne BR, Berman N, Murphy EH (1981) Organization of direction preferences in cat visual cortex. Brain Res 211:445–450
Regan D, Beverley KI (1983) Visual fields described by contrast sensitivity, by acuity, and by relative sensitivity to different orientations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 24:754–759
Schiller PH, Finlay BL, Volman SF (1976) Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J Neurophysiol 39:1320–1333
Sedgewick R (1988) Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass
Swindale NV (1991) A model for the coordinated development of columnar systems in primate striate cortex. Biol Cybern (this volume)
Swindale NV, Matsubara JA, Cynader MS (1987) Surface organization of orientation and direction selectivity in cat area 18. J Neurosci 7:1414–1427
Tolhurst DJ, Dean AF, Thompson ID (1981) Preferred direction of movement as an element of organization of cat visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 44:340–342
Tootell RBH, Hamilton SL, Silerman MS, Switkes E (1988a) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. I. Ocular dominance, binocular interactions, baseline conditions. J Neurosci 8:1500–1530
Tootell RBH, Switkes E, Silverman MS, Hamilton SL (1988b) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II Retinotopic organization. J Neurosci 8:1531–1568
Tootell RBH, Silverman MS, Hamilton SL, De Valois RL, Switkes E (1988c) Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. III Color. J Neurosci 8:1569–1593
Van Essen DC, Newsome WT, Maunsell JHR (1984) The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies and individual variability. Vision Res 24:429–448
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swindale, N.V. Coverage and the design of striate cortex. Biol. Cybern. 65, 415–424 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204654
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204654