Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assimilation of CO2 and introduced organic compounds by bacterial communities in groundwater from southeastern Sweden deep crystalline bedrock

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nutritional responses of unattached and attached bacterial communities were studied in groundwater from 3 sampling depths, i.e., 830–841 m, 910–921 m, and 999–1,078 m, of the subvertical borehole KLX01 at the Laxemar study area in SE Sweden. The salinity profile of the groundwater in this borehole is homogeneous. There were negative redox potentials (Eh) in the waters (−220 to −270 mV) and they contained sulfide, hydrogen, and methane. Biofilm reactors with hydrophilic glass surfaces were connected to the flowing groundwaters from each of the 3 depths with flow rates of approximately 3 x 10−3 m sec−1 over 19 days. There were 0.15 to 0.68 × 105 unattached bacteria ml−1 groundwater and 0.94 to 1.2 × 105 attached bacteria cm−2 on the surfaces. The assimilations of 14CO2, 14C-formate, 1,2,3-3H-acetate, U-14C-lactate, U-14C-glucose, and L-4,5-3H-leucine by the communities were demonstrated with microautoradiographic and liquid scintillation counting techniques. There were significant assimilations of CO2 by all communities, except for the unattached bacteria at the 910–921 m depth, indicating in situ production of organic carbon from carbonate. Assimilation of formate was detected in two communities, indicating the presence of bacteria able to substitute CO2 with formate. Acetate, lactate, and glucose assimilations demonstrated the presence of heterotrophic bacteria. The assimilation of lactate by the attached bacteria dominated over acetate and glucose at all depths. Leucine was assimilated by 20 to 98% of the communities, which showed that major portions of the communities studied were viable. The results indicate that the attached communities at the 830–841 m and 910–921 m depths were in more metabolically active states than the unattached bacteria. Incubation in air compared with N2 indicated that portions of the studied communities were obligate anaerobes, as their ability to assimilate the added compounds was sensitive to oxygen. The results show that the use of several different compounds reduces the risk for false conclusions about the viability and the metabolic activity of the deep groundwater communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker JF, Fritz P (1982) The occurrence and origin of methane in some ground water flow systems. Can J Earth Sci 18:1802–1816.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belyaev SS, Ivanov MV (1983) Bacterial methanogenesis in undergroundwaters. In: Hallberg R (ed) Environmental biogeochemistry. Proc 5th Int Symp Env Biogeochem (ISEB), Liber Tryck, Stockholm, pp 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belyaev SS, Wolkin R, Kenealy WR, DeNiro MJ, Epstein SW, Zeikus JG (1983) Methanogenic bacteria from the Bondyuzhshoe oil field: General characterization and analysis of stable-carbon isotopic fractionation. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:691–697.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beveridge TJ, Fyfe WS (1985) Metal fixation by bacterial cell walls. Can J Earth Sci 22:1893–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapelle FH, Morris PB, McMahon PB, Zelibor JL (1988) Bacterial metabolism and the δ13C composition of groundwater, Floridan aquifer system, South Carolina. Geology 16:117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapelle FH, Zelibor JLJ, Grimes DJ, Knobel LL (1987) Bacteria in deep coastal plain sediments of Maryland: A possible source of CO2 to groundwater. Wat Resour Res 23:1625–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fauque G, Legall J, Barton LL (1991) Sulfate-reducing and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Shively JM, Barton LL (eds) Variations in autotrophic life. Academic Press, London, pp 271–337.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs G (1986) CO2 fixation in acetogenic bacteria: Variations on a theme. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:181–213.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchs G (1990) Alternative pathways of autotrophic CO2 fixation. In: Schlegel HG, Bowien B (eds) Autotrophic bacteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fuchs G, Länge S, Rude E, Schäfer SSR, Scholtz R, Stupperich E (1987) Autotrophic CO2 fixation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. In: Verseveld HW, Duine JA (eds) Microbial growth on C1 compounds. Martin Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghiorse WC, Wilson JT (1988) Microbial ecology of the terrestrial subsurface. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:107–172.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Godsy EM (1980) Isolation of Methanobacterium bryantti from a deep aquifer by using a novel broth-antibiotic disk method. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:1074–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gustavsson G, Liedholm M, Rhén I, Stanfors R, Wikberg P (1991) Äspö hard rock laboratory. Predictions prior to excavation and the process of their validation. SKB technical report, 91–23, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (Box 5864, S-102 48 Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gustafson G, Stanfors R, Wikberg P (1988) Swedish hard rock laboratory first evaluation of preinvestigations 1986–1987 and target area characterization. SKB technical report, 88–16, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gustafson G, Stanfors R, Wikberg P (1989) Swedish hard rock laboratory first evaluation of preinvestigations 1988 and target area characterization. SKB technical report, 89–16, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hall GH, Jones JG, Pickup RW, Simon BM (1990) Techniques for estimating bacterial growth rates and production of biomass in aquatic environments. In: Grigorova R, Norris JR (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol. 22. Academic Press, London, pp 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hallbeck L, Pedersen K (1990) Culture parameters regulating stalk formation and growth rate of Gallionella ferruginea. J Gen Microbiol 136:1675–1680.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hicks RJ, Fredrickson JK (1989) Aerobic metabolic potential of microbial communities indigenous to deep subsurface environments. Geomicrobiol J 7:67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hobbie JE (1990) Measuring heterotrophic activity in plankton. In: Grigorova R, Norris JR (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol. 22. Academic Press, London, pp 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirchman D, K'nees E, Hodson R (1985) Leucine assimilation and its potential as a measure of protein synthesis by bacteria in natural aquatic systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 599–607.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuenen JG, Bos P (1989) Habitat and ecological niches of chemolitho(auto)trophic bacteria. In: Schlegel HG, Bowien B (eds) Autotrophic bacteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 53–96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ladd TI, Costerton JW (1990) Methods for studying biofilm bacteria. In: Grigorova R, Norris JR (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol. 22. Academic Press, London, pp 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lakksoharju M (1990) Colloidal particles in deep Swedish granitic groundwater. SKB progress report, 90–37, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Niemelä S (1983) Statistical evaluation of results from quantitative microbiological examinations. Nordic committee on food analysis. Report no 1, 2nd ed, ISSN 0281-5303.

  25. Olson GJ, Dockins WS, McFeters GA (1981) Sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria from deep aquifers in Montana. Geomicrobiol J 2:327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ormeland RS (1988) Biogeochemistry of methanogenic bacteria. Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York, pp 641–705.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pedersen K (1982) Method for studying microbial biofilms in flowing-water systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pedersen K, Albinson Y (1991) Effect of cell number, pH and lanthanide concentration on the sorption of promethium by Shewanella putrefaciens. Radiochim Acta 54:91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pedersen K, Ekendahl S (1990) Distribution and activity of bacteria in deep granitic groundwaters of southeastern Sweden. Microb Ecol 20:37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pedersen K, Holmström C, Olsson A-K, Pedersen A (1986) Statistical evaluation of the influence of species variation, culture conditions, surface wettability and fluid shear on attachment and biofilm development of marine bacteria. Arch Microbiol 145:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Petterson C, Ephraim J, Allard B, Bóren H (1990) Characterization of humic substances from deep groundwaters in granitic bedrock in Sweden. SKB technical report, 90–29, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Swedish Standard Commission. Available from: Standard commission in Sweden, Box 3295, 103 66 Stockholm, Sweden.

  33. Stanfors R, Erlström M, Markström I (1991) Äspö hard rock laboratory. Overview of the investigations 1986–1990. SKB technical report, 91–20, Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Strandberg GW, Starling E, Schumate H, Parrott JR (1981) Microbial cells as biosorbents for heavy metals: Accumulation of uranium by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pseudomonas aerunginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tabor PS, Neihof RA (1982) Improved MARG method to determine individual microorganisms active in substrate uptake in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:945–953.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Torstensson BA (1984) A new system for groundwater monitoring. Groundwater Monit Rev 3:131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  37. West JM, Christofi N, McKinley IG (1985) An overview of recent microbiological research relevant to the geological disposal of nuclear waste. Radioactive Waste Management and Nuclear Fuel Cycle 6:79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Widdel F (1988) Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. Wiley, New York, pp 469–585.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wikberg P, Axelsen K, Fredlund F (1987) Deep groundwater chemistry. SKB technical report, 87–07 Stockholm. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wood HG, Ljungdahl LG (1991) Autotrophic character of the acetogenic bacteria. In: Shively JM, Barton LL (eds) Variations in autotrophic life. Academic Press, London, pp 201–250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Marine Microbiology, University of Göteborg, Carl Skottsbergs gata 22, S-413 19, Göteborg, Sweden

    Karsten Pedersen & Susanne Ekendahl

Authors
  1. Karsten Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Ekendahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Offprint requests to: K. Pedersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pedersen, K., Ekendahl, S. Assimilation of CO2 and introduced organic compounds by bacterial communities in groundwater from southeastern Sweden deep crystalline bedrock. Microb Ecol 23, 1–14 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165903

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165903

Keywords

Search

Navigation