Skip to main content
Log in

What is the difference between models of error thresholds and Muller's ratchet?

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two independently derived theories predict upper limits to the mutation rate beyond which evolution cannot be controlled by natural selection. One is the theory of Muller's ratchet, explaining the low phylogenetic age of parthenogenetic clones, the other one is the theory of error thresholds, predicting the maximal information content of selfreplicating molecules in prebiotic evolution. Both theories are based on similiar mathematical models but reach qualitatively different conclusions. Muller's ratchet only works in finite populations, while error thresholds are a deterministic phenomenon. In this paper it is shown that this discrepancy is due to different assumptions about the fitness values the selfreplicative units are allowed to assume. If no lower limit for the fitness values is assumed then the deterministic equilibrium frequency of the currently best genotype is strictly positive, no matter how strong mutation is, and random drift is required to cause its extinction (Muller's ratchet). On the other hand, positive lower limits for the fitness values lead to zero equilibrium frequencies in the deterministic description provided the mutation rate is high enough and no back mutations occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, G.: Recombination and the immortality of the germ line. J. Evol. Biol. 1, 67–82 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B.: Model for the evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 75, 5618–5622 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J. F., Kimura, M.: An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper & Row 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetrius, L., Schuster, P., Sigmund, K.: Polynucleotide evolution and branching processes. Bull. Math. Biol. 47, 239–262 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, M., Schuster, P.: The Hypercycle. A Principle of Natural Self-organization. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J.: The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78, 737–756 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, J.: The accumulation of deletorious genes in a population — Muller's Ratchet. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14, 251–267 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J.: The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J.: The relation of recombination to mutational variance. Mutat. Res. 1, 2–9 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M., Schuster, P.: Error thresholds of replication in finite populations: mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's Ratchet. J. Theor. Biol. 137, 375–395 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetina, J., Schuster, P.: Self-replication with errors: a model for polynucleotide replication. Biophys. Chem. 16, 329–345 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. P., Gabriel, W.: Quantitative variation in finite parthenogenetic populations: what stops Muller's ratchet in the absence of recombination? Evolution 44, 715–731 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, G.P., Krall, P. What is the difference between models of error thresholds and Muller's ratchet?. J. Math. Biol. 32, 33–44 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160372

Key words

Navigation