Skip to main content
Log in

A complex systems theory of teleology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Part I [sections 2–4] draws out the conceptual links between modern conceptions of teleology and their Aristotelian predecessor, briefly outlines the mode of functional analysis employed to explicate teleology, and develops the notion of cybernetic organisation in order to distinguish teleonomic and teleomatic systems. Part II is concerned with arriving at a coherent notion of ‘intentional control’. Section 5 argues that intentionality is to be understood in terms of the representational properties of cybernetic systems. Following from this, section 6 argues that intentional control needs to be seen as a particular type of relationship between the system and its environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beer, S.: 1989, ‘The Viable System Model: Its Provenance, Development, Methodology and Pathology’, in Espejo, R. and R. Harndon (eds.),The Viable System Model, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M.H.: 1993,Representational Content in Humans and Machines,J. Expt. Theor. Artif. Intell. 5, 285–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cam, P.: 1984, ‘Consciousness and Content-formation’,Inquiry 27, 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.S.: 1986,Neurophilosophy, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R.: 1984, ‘Functional Analysis’, in E. Sober (ed.),Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 386–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1984, ‘Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI’, in C. Hookway (ed.),Minds, Machines and Evolution, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D. and Weber, B.: 1988, ‘Consequences of Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics for the Darwinian Tradition’, in Depew, Weber, and Smith (eds.),Entropy, Information, and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 317–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, C.: 1988,The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Systems, Oxford U. P., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1981,Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, M.R.: 1993,How Neural Networks Develop Meaningful Representations Through Learning, unpublished.

  • Garfinkel, A.: 1987, ‘The Slime MoldDictyostelium as a Model of Self-Organization in Social System’, in Yates (ed.),Self-Organizing Systems, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, E.: 1984,From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again, Sheed & Ward Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B.C.: 1989, ‘A Structuralist Programme in Developmental Biology’, in Goodwin, Sibatani and Webster (eds.),Dynamic Structures in Biology, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahleg, K. and Hooker, C.A. (eds.): 1989,Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C.A. et al.: 1992, ‘Towards a Theory of Cognition Under a New Control Paradigm’,Topoi 11, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A.: 1991, ‘Antichaos and Adaption’,Scientific American, August, pp. 64–70.

  • Lloyd, D.: 1989,Simple Minds, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.: 1989, ‘Biosemantics’,The Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI.

  • Nagel, E.: 1979,Teleology Revisited And Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, Cniversity Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K.: 1991, ‘Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense’,Philosophy of Science 58, 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Grady, R. T. and Brooks, D.: 1988, ‘Teleology and Biology’, in Depew, Weber and Smith (eds.),Entropy, Information, and Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Shaughnessy, B.: 1986, ‘Consciousness’, in French, Uehling and Wettstein (eds.),Midwest Studies In Philosophy X, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I.: 1984,Order Out Of Chaos, Bantam Books.

  • Richards, W.: 1984, ‘Self-Consciousness and Agency’,Synthese 61, 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R.: 1985, ‘Organisms as Causal Systems Which Are Not Mechanisms: An Essay into the Nature of Complexity’, in R. Rosen (ed.),Theoretical Biology and Complexity, Academic Press, Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinbrot et al.: 1993, ‘Using small perturbations to control chaos’,Nature vol.363, June 1993.

  • Smolensky, P.: 1988, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’,Behavioral and Brain Science 11, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerhoff, G.: 1950,Analytical Biology, Oxford U. P., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillings, et al.: 1987,Cognitive Science, An Introduction, Bradford Books, The MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, R. E.: 1986,Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, A.: 1976,Teleology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to gratefully acknowledge the large guiding input of Professor C. A. Hooker, who supervised the development of this paper from its inception. Bill herfel also provided valuable criticism of late drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen, W. A complex systems theory of teleology. Biol Philos 11, 301–320 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128784

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128784

Key words

Navigation