Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptations for reproduction and development in the skin-brooding ghost pipefishes,Solenostomus

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

Ghost pipefishes comprise a small family (Solenostomidae) of skin-brooding fishes related to true pipefishes and seahorses (Syngnathidae).Solenostomus embryos develop within the fused pelvic fins of the female, unlike syngnathids in which males brood the eggs. Embryos, enclosed in egg envelopes, are attached to epidermal stalks, termed cotylephores, that occur only in brooding females. Cotylephores are cellular outgrowths of the epithelium on the inside surface of the pelvic fins. They attain a mean length of 687 ± 3.89 μm and diameter of 105 ± 3.38 μm. Cotylephores originate on the epithelial surface that lies over the lepidotrichia and they develop into multi-headed cylindrical branches approximately 125 ± 3.65 μm in length and 78 ± 2.19 μm in diameter. A mean of 26 ± 0.63 lateral branches are found on fully developed cotylephores. Each branch terminates in a wide apical calyx, approximately 112 ± 4.16 μm in diameter, to which the egg envelope adheres. Adjacent calyces of the same cotylephore establish attachments with the envelope of a single egg. Cotylephores are composed of a surface epithelium that is continuous with the skin and a fibrous connective tissue core that contains blood vessels that ramify into an apical capillary plexus. The plexus may function in maternal-embryonic metabolic exchange. The cotylephores ofSolenostomus closely resemble the epidermal stalks (cotylephores) that are the sites of egg attachment in the skin-brooding South American catfish,Platystacus cotylephorus. Based on similarity in structure and probable function, cotylephores in the two groups of fishes are an example of evolutionary convergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References cited

  • Balon, E.K. 1975. Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 821–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Balon, E.K. 1981. Additions and amendments to the classification of reproductive styles in fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., G. Rosenquist & I. Svensson. 1988. Multiple coatings and paternal brood care in the pipefish.Syngnathus typhle. Oikos 51: 184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, L. 1958. “Nidification”, pp. 1676–1677.In: P. Grasse(ed.) Traite de Zoologie, Vol. 13, Fascicule II. Masson and Co., Paris

  • Bloch, M.E. 1794. Naturgeschichte der auslandische Fische, achter Theil. J. Moreno & Co., Berlin. 486 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Breder, C.M. Jr. & D.E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. Natural History Press, Garden City. 941 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, W.E. 1989. An atlas of freshwater and marine catfishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 303 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. 1991. The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 352 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahmy, A. 1967. An extemporaneous lead citrate stain for electron microscopy. Proc. Annu. Meet. Electron Microsc. Soc. Am. 25: 148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishelson, L. 1966.Solenostomus cyanopterus Bleeker (Teleostei, Solenostomidae) in Elat (Gulf of Akaba). Israel J. Zool. 15: 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, A.C.L.G. 1880. An introduction to the study of fishes. Adam & Charles Black Publ., Edinburgh. 720 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyatt, M.A. 1986. Basic techniques for transmission electron microscopy. Academic Press, San Diego. 411 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Huot, A. 1902. Recherches sur les poissons lophobranches Ann. Sc. Nat. (Zool) 8 14: 197–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaup, J.J. 1856. Catalogue of lophobranchiate fish in the collection of the British museum. Taylor & Francis London. 76 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiter, R.H. 1993. Coastal fishes of South-eastern Australia. Univ. Hawaii Press, Honolulu. 437 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Leis, J.M. & T. Trnski. 1989. The larvae of Indo-Pacific shorefishes. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. 371 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J.R. & B.L. Soloff. 1964. The physiology of the brood pouch of the male seahorse,Hippocampus erectus. Bull. Mar. Sci. 14: 45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourier, J.P. 1970. Structure fine du rein de l'epinoche (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) au cours de sa transformation Muqueuse. Z. Zellforsch. 106: 232–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J.W. & R.A. Fritzsche. 1993. Revision of the ghost pipefishes, family Solenostomidae (Teleostei: Syngnathoidei). Copeia 1993: 168–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmanabhan, K.G. 1961. Early development ofSolenostomus cyanopterus Bleeker. Bull. Central Res. Inst. Univ. of Kerala, series C (Nat. Sci.): 8: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair, R.L. & A.C.L.G. Günther. 1866. The fishes of Zanzibar. John Van Voorst, London. 153 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Satchell, G.H. 1991. Physiology and form of fish circulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 235 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, L.P. 1953. Fishes of the Marshall and Marianas islands, vol. 1. Bull. U.S. National Museum 202: 1–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsujii, T. & S. Seno. 1990. Melano-macrophage centers in the aglomerular kidney of the sea horse (teleosts): morphologic studies on its formation and possible function. Anat. Record 226: 460–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. & L.F. De Beaufort.1992. The fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago, vol. 4. E.J. Brill Publisher, Leiden. 410 pp

  • Wetzel, J. & J.P. Wourms. 1991. Paternal-embryonic relationships in seahorses and pipefishes (Syngnathidae). Amer. Zool. 31: 83A

  • Whitear, M. 1986. The skin of fishes including cyclostomes: epidermis; dermis. pp. 8–65.In: J. Bereiter-Hahn, A.G. Matoltsky & K.S. Richards (eds.) Biology of the Integument, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

  • Willey, A. 1910. The occurrance ofSolenostomus of the coast of Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica 6: 102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Wourms, J.P. 1981. Viviparity: the maternal-fetal relationship in fishes. Amer. Zool. 21: 473–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Wourms, J.P. & D.M. Cohen. 1975. Trophotaeniae; embryonic adaptations in the viviparous ophidioid fish,Oligopus longhurstii: a study of museum specimens. J. Morph. 147: 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wourms, J.P., B.D. Grove & J. Lombardi. 1988. The maternal-embryonic relationship in viviparous fishes. pp. 1–134.In: W.S. Hoar & D.J. Randall (eds.) Fish Physiology, vol. 11B, Academic Press, San Diego

  • Wourms, J.P. & J. Lombardi. 1992. Reflections on the evolution of piscine viviparity. Amer. Zool. 32: 276–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Wourms, J.P. & J. Wetzel. 1992. Evolutionary morphology of cotylephores: egg attachment sites in skin-brooding fishes. Amer. Zool. 32 (5): 160A

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyman, J. 1859. On some unusual modes of gestation. Amer. J. Sci. 77: 5–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetzel, J., Wourms, J.P. Adaptations for reproduction and development in the skin-brooding ghost pipefishes,Solenostomus . Environ Biol Fish 44, 363–384 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008252

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008252

Key words

Navigation