Skip to main content

The Accusation Model Before the International Criminal Court

Study of Convergence of Criminal Justice Systems

  • Book
  • © 2015

Overview

  • Examines the prosecution model used before the ICC from a comparative point of view
  • Highlights elements of the prosecution model used in four different countries and before the ad hoc tribunals and the ICC, and explains why a certain structure of prosecution has been used before the ICC
  • Addresses questions on the main differences between the civil law and common law judicial systems, and on how changing one of the institutions of criminal procedure influences the remaining institutions

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 16.99 USD 39.99
Discount applied Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (9 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book examines how the functioning of the International Criminal Court has become a forum of convergence between the common law and civil law criminal justice systems. Four countries were selected as primary examples of these two legal traditions: the United States, England and Wales, Germany and Poland.  The first layer of analysis focuses on selected elements of the model of accusation that are crucial to the model adopted by the ICC. These are: development of the notion of the prosecutor’s independence in view of their ties to the countries and the Security Council; the nature and limits of the prosecutor’s discretional powers to initiate proceedings before the ICC; the reasons behind the prosecutor’s choice of both defendants and charges; the role the prosecutor plays in the procedure of disclosure of evidence and consensual termination of proceedings; and the determinants of the model of accusation used during trial and appeal proceedings. The second layer of the book consists in an analysis of the motives behind applying particular solutions to create the model of accusation before the ICC. It also shows how the model of accusation gradually evolved in proceedings before the military and ad hoc tribunals: ICTY and ICTR. Moreover, the question of compatibility of procedural institutions is addressed: In what ways does adopting a certain element of criminal procedure, e.g. discretional powers of the prosecutor to initiate criminal proceedings, influence the remaining procedural elements, e.g. the existence of the dossier of a case or the powers of a judge to change the legal classification of the criminal behavior appearing in the indictment?

Authors and Affiliations

  • Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Hanna Kuczyńska

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us