Skip to main content

Revert Multilane One-ways to Two-way for Safety

In many cities, one-way networks create unnecessary danger

  • Chapter
Walkable City Rules
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

TRAFFIC SAFETY is often counterintuitive. Many people assume that multilane one-way streets are safer than two-way, because you have to look in only one direction to cross, and there are fewer chances for head-on collisions. The problem with this thinking was summed up in a Traverse City, MI, editorial of 1967, asserting that “one way traffic made for a faster, safer flow of vehicles in the downtown area.154.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Traverse City Record Eagle (MI), Editorial (February, 2, 1967).

  2. 2.

    William Riggs and John Gilderbloom, “Two-Way Street Conversion Evidence of Increased Livability in Louisville,” Journal of Planning Education and Research (July 15, 2015), http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0739456X15593147.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Jeff Speck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Speck, J. (2018). Revert Multilane One-ways to Two-way for Safety. In: Walkable City Rules. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-899-2_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics