Abstract
Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by the preferences expressed by other people via their gaze direction, so that objects looked at are liked more than objects looked away from. But when can others’ preferences be trusted? Here, we show that group size influences the extent to which individuals tend to conform to others’ gaze preferences. We adopted the conventional gaze-cuing paradigm and modified the design in such a way that some objects were consistently cued by only one face (single-face condition), whereas other objects were consistently cued by several different faces (multiple-faces condition). While response time measures revealed equal gaze-cuing effects for both conditions, a boost in affective evaluation was observed only for objects looked at by several different faces. Objects looked at by a single face were not rated differently than objects looked away from. These findings suggest that observers make use of group size to evaluate the generalizability of the epistemic information conveyed by others’ gaze: Objects looked at are liked more than objects looked away from, but only when they are looked at by multiple faces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.
Baron-Cohen, S., Campbell, R., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., & Walker, J. (1995). Are children with autism blind to the mentalistic significance of the eyes? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 379–398.
Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression. Cognition, 104, 644–653.
Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Gaze cueing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1061–1066.
Bry, C., Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2011). Eye’m lovin’ it! The role of gazing awareness in mimetic desires. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 987–993.
Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Bach, D. R., Roepstorff, A., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2010). How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects. Current Biology, 20, 1165–1170.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
Ellis, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1992). Self as an epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10(4), 357–375.
Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724.
Frischen, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 516–533.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17, R724–R732.
Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. L. (2006). A nonconformist account of the Asch experiments: Values, pragmatics, and moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 2–19.
Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
King, D., Rowe, A., & Leonards, U. (2011). I trust you; hence I like the things you look at: Gaze cueing and sender trustworthiness influence object evaluation. Social Cognition, 29(4), 476–485.
Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for Closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100.
Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Bar, R., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 345–390). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Manera, V., Elena, M. R., Bayliss, A. P., & Becchio, C. (2014). When seeing is more than looking: Intentional gaze modulates object desirability. Emotion, 14(14), 824–832. doi:10.1037/a0036258.
Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Schieir, C. (2003). Gaze bias reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1–6.
Treinen, E., Corneille, O., & Luypaert, G. (2012). L-eye to me: The combined role of Need for Cognition and facial trustworthiness in mimetic desires. Cognition, 122, 247–251.
van der Weiden, A., Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). When observing gaze shifts of others enhances object desirability. Emotion, 10(6), 939–943.
Acknowledgments
This work received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 312919 to CB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capozzi, F., Bayliss, A.P., Elena, M.R. et al. One is not enough: Group size modulates social gaze-induced object desirability effects. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 850–855 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0717-z