Abstract
The “imageability effect”-highly imageable words are easier to read than abstract words-has been found in cases of acquired dyslexia, developmental dyslexia, and even normal readers. The hypothesis that the imageability effect is a function of the differing ages at which imageable and abstract words are acquired was examined in the present experiment. Specifically, it was hypothesized that if the imageability effect is actually mediated by age of acquisition, then equating high- and low-imagery words for age of acquisition should eliminate the effect. Good and poor readers were required to indicate whether high- and low-imagery words (equated for age of acquisition) were identical to previously presented words and to indicate their confidence in their judgment. Good and poor readers did not differ in their ability to recognize formerly presented high- or low-imagery words. Subjects were also asked to read the words aloud. Reading latency was unaffected by word imagery for either reading group. It was concluded that the imageability effect is mediated by age of acquisition and that controlling this factor eliminates the effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D., Ellis, N. C., Miles, T. R., & Lewis, V. J. Developmental and acquired dyslexia: A comparison. Cognition, 1982, 11, 185–199.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. Methods and designs: Age of acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1980, 12, 395–427.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Logie, R. H. Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition. Current Psychological Research, 1981, 1, 251–262.
Henderson, L. Critical notice: Information-processing approaches to acquired dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1981, 33, 507–522.
Hochhaus, L. A table for the calculation of d′ and beta. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 375–376.
Jorm, A. F. Effects of word imagery on reading performance as a function of reader ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 46–54.
Lorge, I., Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. The Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Test, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1973, 2, 175–199.
Marshall, J. C., Newcombe, F., & Holmes, J. M. Lexical memory: A linguistic approach. In A. Kennedy & A. Wilkes (Eds.), Studies in long-term memory. London: Wiley, 1975.
McLeod, J., & Anderson, J. Gapadol Reading Comprehension Test. Melbourne: Heinemann Educational Australia, 1972.
Patterson, K. Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology, 1981, 72, 151–174.
Patterson, K., & Marcel, A. J. Aphasia, dyslexia and the phonological coding of written words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977, 29, 307–318.
Richardson, J. T. E. The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologica, 1975, 13, 1–7.
Shallice, t., & Warrington, E. K. Word recognition in a phonemic dyslexia patient Quarterly Journal of Experimental 1975, 27, 187–199.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Australian Research Grants Committee, the Educational Research and Development Committee, and the University of Queensland Special Projects fund to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klose, A.E., Schwartz, S. & Brown, J.W.M. The imageability effect in good and poor readers. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21, 446–448 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330004
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330004