Abstract
Extensive studies have been conducted to examine various attentional control effects that stem from stimulus— stimulus (S—S) and stimulus-response (S—R) incompatibility. Among these behavioral paradigms, the best-known are the Stroop effect, the Simon effect, and Posner’s cue validity effect. In this study, we designed two behavioral tasks incorporating these effects (Simon—color-Stroop and Simon-spatial-Stroop) guided by a general framework of S—R ensemble, the dimensional overlap theory. We analyzed various attentional effects according to dimensional overlaps among S—S and S—R ensembles and their combinations. We found that behavioral performance was independently affected by various dimensional overlaps in the Simon—color-Stroop task, whereas different sources of dimensional overlap in the Simon—spatial-Stroop task interacted with each other. We argue that the dimensional overlap theory can be extended to serve as a viable unified theory that accounts for diverse attentional effects and their interactions and helps to elucidate neural networks subserving attentional control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01593-X
Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., et al. (2000). fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 988–1000. doi:10.1162/08989290051137521
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting Stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-Validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270–282. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-0
Corbetta, M., Kincade, J. M., Ollinger, J. M., McAvoy, M. P., & Shulman, G. L. (2000). Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 292–297. doi:10.1038/73009
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
Courtney, S. M. (2004). Attention and cognitive control as emergent properties of information representation in working memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 501–516. doi:10.3758/ CABN.4.4.501
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 374–380. doi:10.1016/ j.tics.2008.07.001
Fan, J., Flombaum, J. I., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. NeuroImage, 18, 42–57. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1319
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I., & Posner, M. I. (2005). The activation of attentional networks. NeuroImage, 26, 471–479. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886
Hahn, B., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (2006). Neuroanatomical dissociation between bottom-up and top-down processes of visuospatial selective attention. NeuroImage, 32, 842–853. doi:10.1016/ j.neuroimage.2006.04.177
Kincade, J. M., Abrams, R. A., Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2005). An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4593–4604. doi:10.1523/ jneurosci.0236-05.2005
Knudsen, E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
Kornblum, S., & Lee, J. W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 855–875. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.855
Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 688–714. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.3.688
Liu, X., Banich, M. T., Jacobson, B. L., & Tanabe, J. L. (2004). Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 22, 1097–1106. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.033
Liu, X., Banich, M. T., Jacobson, B. L., & Tanabe, J. L. (2006). Functional dissociation of attentional selection within PFC: Response and non-response related aspects of attentional selection as ascertained by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 827–834. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj026
Liu, X., Wang, H., Corbly, C. R., Zhang, J., & Joseph, J. E. (2006). The involvement of the inferior parietal cortex in the numerical Stroop effect and the distance effect in a two-digit number comparison task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1518–1530. doi:10.1162/ jocn.2006.18.9.1518
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
MacLeod, C. M. (1992). The Stroop task: The “gold standard” of attentional measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 12–14. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.1.12
Nee, D. E., Wager, T. D., & Jonides, J. (2007). Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 1–17. doi:10.3758/CABN.7.1.1
Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., & Rafal, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 298, 187–198. doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0081
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. doi:10.1146/ annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 109, 160–174.
Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433–435.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Vossel, S., Thiel, C. M., & Fink, G. R. (2006). Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 32, 1257–1264. doi:10.1016/ j.neuroimage.2006.05.019
Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 22, 1679–1693. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.052
Wager, T. D., Sylvester, C. Y., Lacey, S. C., Nee, D. E., Franklin, M., & Jonides, J. (2005). Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage, 27, 323–340. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.054
Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Grant MO1 RR00071 and a NARSAD Young Investigator Award (to X.L.).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Park, Y., Gu, X. et al. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus—response compatibility effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1710–1720 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1710
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1710