Abstract
The paper presents the results of the verification of ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses data on surface air temperature obtained from drifting buoys, ground-based weather stations, and, for the first time, from measurements at the North Pole drifting stations. The North Pole station data were not assimilated in the reanalyses, which provides a rare opportunity for independent validation. The comparison with data of the North Pole drifting stations revealed that bias for the cold season in the Arctic basin is 2.25°С for ERA-Interim and 3.92°С for ERA5, respectively. The comparison with data of drifting buoys allows us to speculate about the cause of such large errors in the reanalyses. Some buoys were installed from the air-based platform. In this case, the temperature sensor of the buoy was potentially buried in the snow cover that shielded it from the cold atmosphere and contributed to the heating due to the heat flux from the underlying layer of sea water. The assimilation of such data could be one of the reasons for the overestimation of air temperature over drifting ice in the both reanalysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
D. P. Dee, S. M. Uppala, A. J. Simmons, P. Berrisford, P. Poli, S. Kobayashi, U. Andrae, M. A. Balmaseda, G. Balsamo, P. Bauer, P. Bechtold, A. C. M. Beljaars, L. van de Berg, J. Bidlot, N. Bormann, C. Delsol, R. Dragani, M. Fuentes, A. J. Geer, L. Haimberger, S. B. Healy, H. Hersbach, E. V. Hylm, L. Isaksen, P. Kellberg, M. Kohler, M. Matricardi, A. P. McNally, B. M. Monge-Sanz, J.-J. Morcrette, B.-K. Park, C. Peubey, P. de Rosnay, C. Tavolato, J.-N. Thepaut, and F. Vitart, “The ERA-Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System,” Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., No. 656, 137 (2011).
L.-E. Fredriksen, “An Evaluation of the Reanalyses ERA-Interim and ERA5 in the Arctic Using N-ICE2015 Data,” Uit the Arctic University of Norway (2018).
H. Hersbach and D. Dee, “ERA5 Reanalysis is in Production,” ECMWF News, No. 7, 147 (2016).
E. C. Hunke and M. M. Holland, “Global Atmospheric Forcing Data for Arctic Ice-ocean Modeling,” J. Geophys. Res. Ocean, No. C4, 112 (2007).
E. Jakobson, T. Vihma, T. Palo, L. Jakobson, H. Keernik, and J. Jaagus, “Validation of Atmospheric Reanalyses over the Central Arctic Ocean,” Geophys. Res. Lett., No. 10, 39 (2012).
M. O. Jonassen, I. Valisuo, T. Vihma P., Uotila, A. P. Makshtas, and J. Launiainen, “Assessment of Atmospheric Reanalyses with Independent Observations in the Weddell Sea, the Antarctic,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124 (2019).
P. D. Jones, D. H. Lister, T. J. Osborn, C. Harpham, M. Salmon, and C. P. Morice, “Hemispheric and Large-scale Land-surface Air Temperature Variations: An Extensive Revision and an Update to 2010,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., No. D5, 117 (2012).
R. Lindsay, M. Wensnahan, A. Schweiger, and J. Zhang, “Evaluation of Seven Different Atmospheric Reanalysis Products in the Arctic,” J. Climate, No. 7, 27 (2014).
A. Makshtas, D. Atkinson, M. Kulakov, S. Shutilin, R. Krishfield, and A. Proshutinsky, “Atmospheric Forcing Validation for Modeling the Central Arctic,” Geophys. Res. Lett., No. 20, 34 (2007).
A. T. Nguyen, D. Menemenlis, and R. Kwok, “Arctic Ice-ocean Simulation with Optimized Model Parameters: Approach and Assessment,” J. Geophys. Res. Ocean, No. C4, 116 (2011).
I. G. Rigor, R. L. Colony, and S. Martin, “Variations in Surface Air Temperature Observations in the Arctic, 1979–97,” J. Climate, No. 5, 13 (2000).
T. Vihma, J. Jaagus, E. Jakobson, and T. Palo, “Meteorological Conditions in the Arctic Ocean in Spring and Summer 2007 as Recorded on the Drifting Ice Station Tara,” Geophys. Res. Lett., No. 18, 35 (2008).
C. Wang, R. M. Graham, K. Wang, S. Gerland, and M. A. Granskog, “Comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim Near-surface Air Temperature, Snowfall and Precipitation over Arctic Sea Ice: Effects on Sea Ice Thermodynamics and Evolution,” Cryosphere, No. 6, 13 (2019).
Q. Yang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, C. Sui, J. Xing, M. Li, C. Li, J. Zhao, and L. Zhang, “Sensitivity of the Arctic Sea Ice Concentration Forecasts to Different Atmospheric Forcing: A Case Study,” Acta Oceanol. Sin., No. 12, 33 (2014).
Funding
The research was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 18-05-60048 “Studying Interannual Variability of Sea Ice Balance in the Arctic Ocean at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries.” A.P. Makshtas and I.A. Makhotina thank the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation for financial support (grant RFMEFI61619X0108).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Russian Text ©The Author(s), 2020, published in Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya, 2020, No. 11, pp. 36-45.
About this article
Cite this article
Demchev, D.M., Kulakov, M.Y., Makshtas, A.P. et al. Verification of ERA-Interim and ERA5 Reanalyses Data on Surface Air Temperature in the Arctic. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 45, 771–777 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373920110035
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373920110035