Skip to main content
Log in

On the hypothesis of the eruption origin of near-parabolic comets

  • Dynamics and Physics of Solar System Bodies
  • Published:
Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hypothesis on the genetic connection of near-parabolic comets with Jupiter, Saturn, and the transPlutonian region (5–3000 AU) proposed by E.M. Drobyshevskii is considered. It has been shown that, on average, 5.6 comets per an area of 106 AU2 passed through the transPlutonian region during the whole history of observations. Six-hundred nineteen comets crossed the ecliptic at heliocentric distances ranging from 0 to 2 AU. As has been shown, from the total number of 945 near-parabolic comets, eight comets closely approached Jupiter and five closely approached Saturn. The Kreutz comets, 1277 objects, did not approach Jupiter closer than 3 AU. Their minimal distance to Saturn was 5.5 AU. The minimal distance of the Kreutz comets from the edge of the transPlutonian region was 28.8 AU. The analysis led to the conclusion that the concept on the origin of the near-parabolic comets suggested by Drobyshevskii is groundless.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. M. Drobyshevskii, “History of Titanium, Rings and Magnetic Field of Saturn and the Nature of Short-Periodic Comets,” Preprint Fiz.-Tekh. Inst. No. 674 (LIYaF, Leningrad, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. M. Drobyshevskii, “Danger of Explosion of Callisto and Priority of Space Mission,” Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 69(9), 10–14 (1999) [Tech. Phys. 44, 1009 (1999)].

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. I. Ipatov, Migration of Celestial Bodies in the Solar System (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. P. Konopleva, “On the Existence of the Jupiter and Saturn Families among Non-Periodic Comets,” Komet. Tsirk. No. 258 (1980).

  5. S. G. Natanson, “On Origin of Comets,” Works of Astron. Observ. of Petrograd. Univ., 18–24 (1923).

  6. V. S. Safronov, Evolution of the Protoplanetary Cloud and Formation of the Earth and the Planets (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Tsitsin, “Comet Origin: New Look on Old Problem,” Zemlya Vselennaya, No. 1, 60–69 (1999).

  8. L. M. Shul’man, “Passages of Comets,” Visn. Astron. Shkoli, No. 2, 4 (2003).

  9. E. M. Drobyshevsky, “The Young Long-Period Comet Family of Saturn,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 315, 517–520 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. G. Marsden and G. V. Williams, Catalogue of Cometary Orbits, 17th ed. (SAO, Solar, Stellar Planetary Science Division, Cambridge, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © O.V. Kalinicheva, V.P. Tomanov, 2010, published in Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 2010, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 71–80.

About this article

Cite this article

Kalinicheva, O.V., Tomanov, V.P. On the hypothesis of the eruption origin of near-parabolic comets. Kinemat. Phys. Celest. Bodies 26, 264–268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591310050065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591310050065

Keywords

Navigation