Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of humic fertilizers on the quantity and structure of the bacterial complexes of potato field

  • Ecology
  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of humic fertilizers on the bacterial communities of potato plants was studied by spraying of the plants in flowering. It was found that the quantity of bacteria in the plant phyllosphere and rhizosphere was 10- to 100-fold decreased, especially as a result of spraying the plant with the “Bioud-1” fertilizer. However, the favorable changes occurred in the taxonomic structure of epiphytic bacterial complexes, because the part of cellulolytic bacteria was increased significantly. These data seem to be of practical importance, taking into account that after potato harvesting the aboveground parts of the plants remain in the field. As a result, the destruction of the plant residues should be accelerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balabko, P.N., Golovkov, A.M., Khusnetdinova, T.I., et al., Role of humate and biofertilizer-1 in potato growth technology at sod-podzol soil, Probl. Agrokhim. Ekol., 2010, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brysozovskii, I.I., Potato cultivation and optimization, Izv. Kaliningrad. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2003, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kulikova, N.A., Humic matters: their protecting effect with respect to plants in water and soil mediums during abiotic stresses, Doctoral Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kulinkovich, S.N. and Karpovich, T.D., Efficiency of complex liquid organic fertilizer “Gumistim” for winter wheat, Ekol. Zemledelie. Belorus. Sel’sk. Khoz., 2009, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lysak, L.V., Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., and Skvortsova, I.N., Metody otsenki bakterial’nogo raznoobraziya pochv i identifikatsiya pochvennykh bakterii (The Way to Estimate Soils Bacterial Variability and Soil Bacteria Identification), Moscow, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marukhlenko, A.V., Borisova, N.P., and Molyavko, A.A., Gumistim raises potato productivity, Kartofel’ Ovoshchi, 2005, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1957.

  8. Reshnovetskii, S.B., Kalendar’ kartofelevoda (Schedule for Potato Grower), Kaliningrad, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suleimanova, D.S., Fertilizers effect onto cellulolytic microorganisms at almond plant rhizosphere, Vestn. Mosk. Obl. Gos. Univ., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2009, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Torikov, V.E., Gumistim effect onto agriculture plants productivity, in Biologizatsiya zemledeliya v Nechernozemnoi zone Rossii. Nauchn. tr. (Agriculture Biologization in Non-Chernozem Area of Russia. Collection of Scientific Works), Bryansk, 2006, issue 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khristeva, L.A., How physiologically active humus matters effect onto plants under extreme conditions, in Guminovye udobreniya. Teoriya i praktika ikh primeneniya v vodnoi i pochvennoi sredakh (Humic Fertilizers. Theory and Practice of Their Application in Water and Soil Mediums), 1977, vol. 6.

  12. Yakimenko, O.S. and Terekhova, V.A., Humic preparations and the assessment of their biological activity for certification purposes, Eur. Soil Sci., 2011, vol. 44, no. 11, p. 1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azam, F., Effect of humic acids on seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different conditions, Pak. J. Bot., 1982, vol. 14, pp. 47–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chem, Y. and Aviad, T., Effects of humic substances on plant growth, in Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Reading, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clapp, C.E., Chen, Y., Hayes, M.H.B., and Cheng, H.H., Plant growth promoting activity of humic substances, in Understanding and Managing Organic Matter in Soils, Sediments, and Waters, Switft, R.S. and Sparks, K.M., Eds., Madison, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malcolm, R.L. and Vaughan, D., Effects of humic acid fractions on invertase activities in plant tissues, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1978, vol. 11, pp. 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nardi, S., Physiological effect of humic substances in higher plants, Soil Biol. Biochem., 2002, vol. 34, pp. 1527–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Visser, S.A., Physiological action of humic substances on microbial cells, Soil Biol. Biochem., 1985, vol. 17, pp. 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Dobrovolskaya.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © T.G. Dobrovolskaya, E.A. Leontyevskaya, K.A. Khusnetdinova, P.N. Balabko, 2013, published in Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Pochvovedenie, 2013, No. 3, pp. 47–50.

About this article

Cite this article

Dobrovolskaya, T.G., Leontyevskaya, E.A., Khusnetdinova, K.A. et al. Effect of humic fertilizers on the quantity and structure of the bacterial complexes of potato field. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 68, 142–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687413030034

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687413030034

Keywords

Navigation