Skip to main content
Log in

The concept of a technotronic document

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

The concept of a “technotronic document” is analyzed. The content of the concept is suggested to be bound not only with the technical origin of a document but also with other essential signs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otle, P. The Tractate about Documentation, in Biblioteka, bibliografiya, dokumentatsiya: Izbrannye trudy pionera informatiki (A Library, Bibliography, Documentation: Selected Works of the Pioneer of Information Science), Russian State Library, Transl. from English by Gilyarevskii, R.S., Moscow: FAIR-PRESS: Pashkov dom, 2004, pp. 187–308.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mityaev, K.G. Documentation, Its Tasks, and Prospects of Development, Voprosy arkhivovedeniya, 1964, no 2, pp. 23–37.

  3. Kuzin, A.A. and Filippov, N.G., (Technical Documentation), Moscow, 1973.

  4. Uvarova, L.I., The Documentation of Development of Technical Instruments, in Problemy nauchno-tekhnicheskikh dokumentov i arkhivov: Mezhvuzovskii sbornik (Problems of Scientific-Technical Documents and Archives: an Inter-University Collection), Kuzin, A.A., Ed., Moscow: MGIAI, 1984, pp. 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Magidov, V.M., Cinema Photo Documents as a Historical Source, Otechestvennaya istoriya, 1992, no. 5, pp. 104–116.

  6. Magidov, V.M., Cinema Photo Documents, in Professionalizm istorika i ideologicheskaya kon’yunktura: Problema istochnikovedeniya sovetskoi istorii (Professionalism of a Historian and Ideological Conjuncture: Problem of Source Study in the Soviet History), Moscow, 1994, pp. 321–381.

  7. Magidov, V.M., Kinofotofonodokumety v kontekste istoricheskogo znaniya (Cinema Photo Phono Documents in the Context of Historical Knowledge), Moscow, 2005.

  8. Magidov, V.M., Technotronic Documents and Archives: Problems of Archivistics and Source Study, Vestnik arkhivista, 1998, no. 2 (44), pp. 30–37.

  9. Magidov, V.M., Tekhnotronnaya arkhivistika na rubezhe stoletii (teoretiko-istoriograficheskiye razmyshleniya (Technotronic Archivistics at the Turn of Century (Theoretic-Historiographic Reflections)), [an Electronic Resource], the access mode: http://iai.rshu.ru/jubiley/arhivistika/p11.html.

  10. Gedrovich, F.A., Technotronic Documents are the Results of Technically Determined Forms of Writing, Vestnik arkhivista, 1998, no. 2 (44), pp. 71–73.

  11. Khrapchenko, M.B., The Nature of an Aesthetic Sign, Voprosy filosofii, 1976, no. 3, pp. 96–107.

  12. Dyakonov, I.M., Writing, in (Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary), Yartseva, V.N., Chief Ed., Moscow, 1990.

  13. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., A Book and Document: the Correlation of Notions, in Kniga: issledovaniya i materialy (A Book: Investigations and Materials), Moscow, 1994, collection 68, pp. 19–37.

  14. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., Tipologiya dokumenta: Nach. posib. dlya st. in-tiv kul’turi (The Typology of a Document: an Elementary Manual for Students of Institutes of Culture), Kiev, 1998.

  15. Kuleshov, S.G., Novi navchal’ni vidannya z dokumentoznavstva, Studii z arkhiv. spravi ta dokumentoznavstva, Kiev, 1999, part 3, pp. 202–203 (A Review on the Book: Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., Tipologiya dokumenta: Nach. posib. dlya stud. in-tiv kul’turi, Kiev, 1998).

  16. Kuleshov, S.G., Dokumetoznavstvo: Istoriya. Teoretichni osnovi (Documentation Science: History. Theoretical Bases), Kiev, 2000.

  17. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., Some Discussion Problems of the Typological Classification of Documents, in Kniga: issledovaniya i materialy (A Book: Investigations and Materials), Moscow, 1994, collection 80, pp. 186–202.

  18. Shvetsova-Vodka, G.N., Dokumentoznavstvo: Navh. posib, Kiev: Znaniya, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sovremennyi slovar’ inostrannykh slov (Modern Dictionary of Foreign Words), Moscow, 1992.

  20. Palekha, Yu.I. and Lemish, N.O., Zagal’ne dokumentoznavstvo: Navc. posibnik, Kiev: Lira-K, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maistrovich, T.V., Elektronnyi dokument kak obyekt bibliotechnogo dela (An Electronic Document as an Object of Library Science), Moscow, 2004.

  22. The Law of the Republic of Belarus as of November 6, 1994, no. 3277-XII “On the National Archival Fund and Archives in the Republic of Belarus”: in Reduction of the Law as of January 6, 1999, no. 236–3, Vedamastsi Natsyanal’naga skhody Respubliki Belarus’, 1999, no. 5–6.

  23. Pleshkevich, E.A., On theNotion of Continuousness in the Documentation Science, NTI, ser.1, 2008, no. 1, pp. 11–16.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.A. Pleshkevich, 2008, published in Nauchno-Technicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1, 2008, No. 12, pp. 1–6.

About this article

Cite this article

Pleshkevich, E.A. The concept of a technotronic document. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 35, 263–268 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688208060063

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688208060063

Key words

Navigation