Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are safety data sheets for cleaning products used in Norway a factor contributing to the risk of workers exposure to chemicals?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

Abstract

Objectives

Cleaning products are considered less hazardous than those used in other sectors. Suppliers and distributors are less conscientious when it comes to informing users on health risks. The aim of the study was to elaborate on the usefulness and clarity of information in the safety data sheets (SDS) for cleaning products, and considering if the use of these SDSs can be seen as a risk factor towards occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals in the sector.

Material and Methods

Safety data sheets were selected based on the risk level of the product assigned in an industrial sector scheme. 320 SDSs for cleaning products were reviewed. Constituent components found in the products over a given threshold were listed and available information thereof used to assess the perceived non-hazard consideration of the chemicals.

Results

The contents of the SDSs was generic and mostly incomplete. Safety measures and health information lacked sufficient specificity despite varying compositions and concentrations of components. There is generally incompatibility between mentioned sections on the suggested non-hazardous nature of the products and health effects. Not all substances used in these products have harmonized classifications, which makes them open to various classification of the products and the suggested safety measures. This results in different companies classifying similar products differently. Risk management measures and suggested personal protective equipment (PPEs) are given haphazardly. Physical properties relevant to risk assessment are not included.

Conclusions

The safety data sheets are ambiguous, and they lack relevant and important information. Inadequate information and risk assessment concerning the products can lead to workers being exposed to hazardous chemicals. Underestimation of the hazard contribution of the components of the products and the insufficient, non-objective mention of appropriate control and protective measures are the major contributing elements. There is a need to test the products in order to establish health effects and product specific safety measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Direktoratet for Arbeidstilsynet. [Regulation on work performance, use of work equipment and associated technical requirements. Set by Royal Norwegian Ministry of Labour]; 2013 [cited 2013 Jul 20]. Available from: http://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2011-12-06-1357. Norwegian.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicol AM, Hurrel AC, Wahyuni D, McDowell W, Chu W. Accuracy, comprehensibility, and use of material safety data sheets. A review. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(11):861–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olcert R. Use in well ventilated area. J Am Ind Hyg Assoc. 1999;60(3):337.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keegel T, Saunders H, la Montagne AD, Nixon R. Are material safety data sheets useful in diagnosis and management of occupational contact dermatitis? Contact Dermat. 2007;57(5):331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein J. Material safety data sheets. Are they reliable in identifying human hazards? J Allergy Clinic Immunol. 2002;110(1):35–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carøe TK, Ebbehøj N, Agner T. A survey of exposures related to recognized occupational contact. Contact Dermat. 2014;70(1):56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer A. Contact dermatitits in the cleaning industry. Current Opinion. Allergy Clinic Immunol. 2013;13(5):521–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Folletti I, Zock JP, Moscato G, Siracusa A. Asthma and rhinitis in cleaning workers. A systematic review of epidemiological studies. J Asthma. 2014;51(1):18–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Siracusa A, de Blay F, Folleti I, Moscato G, Olivieri M, Quirce S, et al. Asthma and exposure to cleaning products. A European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force consensus statement. Allergy. 2013;68(12):1532–1545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. European Parliament and the Council. Directive 1999/45/EC of 31 May 1999 concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and label-ling of dangerous preparations (Jul 30, 1999). Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1999:200:0001:0068:EN:PDF.

  11. European Parliament and the Council. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 453/2010 of 20 May 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (May 31, 2010). Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:133:0001:0043:en:PDF.

  12. European Chemical Agency. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, chapter R.12: Use descriptor system. Helsinki: EchA; 2010 [cited 2013 Aug 08]. Available from: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r12_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. Risks resulting from skin contact — Determination, evaluation, measures; 2006 [cited 2013 Aug 4]. Available from: http://www.baua.de/nn_54598/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Hazardous-Substances/TRGS/pdf/TRGS-401.pdf.

  14. European Parliament and the Council. Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Regulation 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commision Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (Dec 30, 2006). Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:396:0001:0849:EN:PDF.

  15. European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 (Dec 18, 2008). Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:339:0078:0081:EN:PDF.

  16. Lavoué J, Bégin D, Gérin M. Technical, occupational health and environmental aspects of metal degreasing with aqueous cleaners. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(6):441–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Glycol ethers and its relevance to man. 1995; technical report No. 64. Available from: http://www.ecetoc.org/technical-reports.

  18. International Program on Chemicals Safety. Quaternary ammonium compounds. Poison Information Monograph (PIM) G022 [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2013 Aug 14]. Available from: http://www.inchem.org/documents/pims/chemical/pimg022.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Program on Chemicals Safety. Linear alkyl benzene sulfonates and related compounds. Environmental Health Criteria 169 [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2013 Aug 14]. Available from: http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc169.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolp PW, Williams P, Burtan RC. Assessment of the accuracy of material safety data sheets. J Am Ind Hyg Assoc. 1995;56(2):178–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Blayney MB. The need for empirically derived permeation data for personal protective equipment: The death of Dr. Karen E. Wetterhahn. Appl Occup Envir Hyg. 2001;16(2):233–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Direktoratet for Arbeidstilsynet. [Information on breathing equipment]. 2002 [cited 2013 Jul 27]. Available from: http://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/binfil/download2.php?tid=77748. Norwegian.

  23. Kortenkamp A, Backhaus T, Faust M. State of the art report on mixture toxicity. EU Commission, DG Enterprise study; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. European Parliament and Council. Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (16.8.1967). Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31967L0548&from=EN.

  25. Lee JH, Sohn EK, Ahn JS, Ahn K, Kim KS, Lee TM, et al. Exposure assessment of workers in printed electronics workplace. Inhalation Toxicol. 2013;25(8):426–434, http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.800617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Welsh MS, Lamesse M, Karpinski E. The verification of hazardous ingredients disclosures in selected material safety data sheets. Appl Occup Envir Hyg. 2000;15(5):409–420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tillberg A. A multidisciplinary risk assessment of dental restorative materials. Umeå University Odontological Dissertation. Umeå: Department of Odontology /Dental Technician Programme; 2008 [cited 2013 Aug 7]. Available from: http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:142221/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oldershaw P, FairHurst S. Sharing toxicological information on industrial chemicals. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001;45(4):291–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cherrie JW, Semple S, Brouwer D. Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals. Proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004;48(7):607–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lechtenberg-Auffarth E, Rühl R. Safety of gloves for chemicals protection. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007;51(8):739–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Market Surveillance of Chemicals, Labour Inspection Authority, Oslo, Norway

    Abdulqadir M. Suleiman

  2. Institute of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Kristin V. H. Svendsen

Authors
  1. Abdulqadir M. Suleiman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristin V. H. Svendsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulqadir M. Suleiman.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suleiman, A.M., Svendsen, K.V.H. Are safety data sheets for cleaning products used in Norway a factor contributing to the risk of workers exposure to chemicals?. IJOMEH 27, 840–853 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0302-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0302-8

Key words

Search

Navigation