References
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.
Zanagnolo V, Baroni C, Achilarre MT, et al. Oncological outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) for patients with early stage cervical cancer: experience at a referral cancer center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09016-1.
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Kucukmetin A, et al. SUCCOR study. An international european cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009, < 4 cm) cervical cancer operated in 2013–2014. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019:29:A1–2.
Alfonzo E, Wallin E, Ekdahl L, et al. No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer: results from a nationwide population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2019;116:169–77.
Falconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K, et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(6):1072–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Vanna Zanagnolo and Alessia Aloisi deny any commercial interests they may have in the subject matter of this study, and any sources of financial or material support.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zanagnolo, V., Aloisi, A. ASO Author Reflections: Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 1830–1831 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09057-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09057-6