Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic surgery by reducing abdominal trauma; however, few comparative studies have addressed its role in gastric cancer.

Purpose

This study sought to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SLDG) with radical D2 lymphadenectomy by comparing its short- and long-term outcomes with those of conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLDG).

Methods

From October 2007 to December 2011, we identified 175 patients with clinical stage I–III gastric cancer who underwent SLDG with D2 lymphadenectomy (n = 90) and MLDG (n = 85) according to a review of our prospective gastric cancer database in our institute. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the two groups.

Results

Mean operative time was similar between the two groups, while blood loss was significantly lower in the SLDG group than in the MLDG group. Postoperative recovery was faster in the SLDG group in terms of earlier initiation of oral intake, less use of analgesics, and shorter hospital stay. Serum C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in the SLDG group than in the MLDG group on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, and the 5-year overall survival rate was not significantly different between the two groups (93.7 vs. 87.6 %; p = 0.689).

Conclusions

This study shows that SLDG with D2 lymphadenectomy is safe and feasible for gastric cancer, with better short-term outcomes than MLDG and acceptable oncologic outcomes. Thus, SLDG may be an attractive surgical alternative in minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1994;4:146–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery. 2002;131:S306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, The JCOG Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer. 2010;13:238–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Viñuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255:446–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:721–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ziqiang W, Feng Q, Zhimin C, et al. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer management. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang SI, Kim HO, Yoo CH, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1252–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, et al. Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2594–2602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2400–04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park DJ, Lee J-H, Ahn S-H, Eng AKH, Kim H-H. Single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ β lymph node dissection for gastric cancers. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:e214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahn SH, Son SY, Jung do H, Park do J, Kim HH. Pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparative study with multi-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:933–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Omori T, Masuzawa T, Akamatsu H, Nishida T. A simple and safe method for Billroth I reconstruction in single-incision laparoscopic gastrectomy using a novel intracorporeal triangular anastomotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:613–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Omori T, Nishida T. Distal gastrectomy. In: Mori T, Dapri G, editors. Reduced port laparoscopic surgery. Tokyo: Springer; 2014. p. 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Omori T, Tanaka K, Tori M, Ueshima S, Akamatsu H, Nishida T. Intracorporeal circular-stapled Billroth I anastomosis in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1490–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, Nishida T. Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1702–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Omori T, Nakajima K, Nishida T, et al. A simple technique for circular-stapled Billroth I reconstruction in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:734–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, et al. A simple and safe method for gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the hemidouble-stapling technique: efficient purse-string stapling technique. Dig Surg. 2010;26:441–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39:2734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hingorani AD, Casas JP. The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomization analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:1214–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kashiwagi H, Kumagai K, Monma E, Nozue M. Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Paola MD, Recher A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241:232–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Takeshi Omori, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, JeongHo Moon, Keijiro Sugimura, Hiroshi Miyata, Toru Masuzawa, Kentaro Kishi, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Akira Tomokuni, Hirofumi Akita, Hidenori Takahashi, Syougo Kobayashi, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Masahiko Yano, and Masato Sakon have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Omori MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omori, T., Fujiwara, Y., Moon, J. et al. Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23 (Suppl 5), 817–824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5485-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5485-8

Keywords

Navigation