Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Local Control Modality and Outcome for Ewing Sarcoma of the Femur: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group

  • Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The choice of a local control (LC) modality for Ewing sarcoma (EWS) of the femur is controversial. This study aimed to determine the effect of LC modality on tumor LC and patient outcomes.

Methods

The study reviewed the treatment and outcomes for 115 patients who had EWS of the femur treated with similar chemotherapy in three cooperative group trials. Patient outcomes were analyzed according to the LC modality using the log-rank test and the cumulative incidence of local or distant failure using competing risks regression.

Results

The median age of the patients was 13 years. The most common tumor location was the proximal femur followed by the mid femur. For 55 patients with available data, the tumor was larger than 8 cm in 29 patients and 8 cm or smaller in 26 patients. For 84 patients (73 %), surgery only was performed, whereas 17 patients (15 %) had surgery plus radiation, and 14 patients (12 %) had radiation only. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 65 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 55–73 %), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70 % (95 % CI, 61–78 %). Patient outcomes did not differ significantly according to tumor location within the femur (proximal, mid or distal) or tumor size (<8 vs ≥8 cm). The findings showed no statistically significant differences in EFS, OS, cumulative incidence of local failure, or cumulative incidence of distant failure according to LC modality (surgery, surgery plus radiation, or radiation).

Conclusions

The LC modality did not significantly affect disease outcome for EWS of the femur. Further study of treatment complications and functional outcome may help to define the optimal LC modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:694–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Granowetter L, Womer R, Devidas M, et al. Dose-intensified compared with standard chemotherapy for nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: a Children’s Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2536–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Womer RB, West DC, Krailo MD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of interval-compressed chemotherapy for the treatment of localized Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. DuBois SG, Krailo MD, Gebhardt MC, et al. Comparative evaluation of local control strategies in localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Cancer. 2015;121:467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yock TI, Krailo M, Fryer CJ, et al. Local control in pelvic Ewing sarcoma: analysis from INT-0091—a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3838–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulussen M, Ahrens S, Dunst J, et al. Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1818–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch JC. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat. 1917;21:177–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding JW, Cochran GV, Zickel RE. Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1974;5:629–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Terek RM, Brien EW, Marcove RC, Meyers PA, Lane JM, Healey JH. Treatment of femoral Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer. 1996;78:70–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, et al. Local and systemic control in Ewing’s sarcoma of the femur treated with chemotherapy, and locally by radiotherapy and/or surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Hoffmann C, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma of the femur: prognosis in 69 patients treated by the CESS group. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:20–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2001) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. vol 360. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16:1141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arai Y, Kun LE, Brooks MT, et al. Ewing’s sarcoma: local tumor control and patterns of failure following limited-volume radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:1501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, et al. Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic Ewing’s sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: analysis of 359 patients at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:4–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotterill SJ, Ahrens S, Paulussen M, et al. Prognostic factors in Ewing’s tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European Intergroup Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3108–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Liu T, Krasin MJ, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in ewing sarcoma family of tumors: review of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital studies. Cancer. 2007;110:375–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Springfield DS, Pagliarulo C. Fractures of long bones previously treated for Ewing’s sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:477–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Damron TA, Sim FH, O’Connor MI, Pritchard DJ, Smithson WA (1996) Ewing’s sarcoma of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 322: 232–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Strong LC, Herson J, Osborne BM, Sutow WW. Risk of radiation-related subsequent malignant tumors in survivors of Ewing’s sarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979;62:1401–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuttesch JF Jr, Wexler LH, Marcus RB, et al. Second malignancies after Ewing’s sarcoma: radiation dose-dependency of secondary sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:2818–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stish BJ, Ahmed SK, Rose PS, Arndt CA, Laack NN. Patient-reported functional and quality-of-life outcomes in a large cohort of long-term survivors of Ewing Sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62:2189–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute grant 1K23CA154530 and by U10CA180886 (NCTN Operations Center Grant) and U10CA180899 (NCTN Statistics & Data Center Grant), as well as by U10CA98543 (Chair’s Grant) and U10CA98413 (Statistics & Data Center Grant) grants from the National Cancer Institute. Additional support for research was provided by a grant from the WWWW (QuadW) Foundation, Inc. (www.QuadW.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najat C. Daw MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daw, N.C., Laack, N.N., McIlvaine, E.J. et al. Local Control Modality and Outcome for Ewing Sarcoma of the Femur: A Report From the Children’s Oncology Group. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 3541–3547 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5269-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5269-1

Keywords

Navigation