Skip to main content
Log in

Do Hospital Attributes Predict Guideline-Recommended Gastric Cancer Care in the United States?

  • Healthcare Policy and Outcomes
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hospital attributes have been shown to impact short- and long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. However, the effect of hospital attributes on processes of cancer care in terms of delivery of guideline recommended care has not been evaluated. We examined the impact of hospital attributes (volume and type) on guideline-recommended care in patients treated for gastric cancer.

Methods

We identified patients who were surgically treated for gastric cancer at Commission on Cancer (CoC) hospitals from 2001 to 2006. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were compared separately by hospital volume and type. Multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the impact of hospital attributes on delivery of guideline recommended gastric cancer care: adequate lymphadenectomy (≥15 lymph nodes), and adjuvant multimodality therapy (for AJCC Ib–IVM0), controlling for covariates.

Results

More than 1,490 CoC hospitals performed 37,124 gastrectomies. High-volume and teaching CoC hospitals were more likely to treat younger patients, non-whites, patients with lower AJCC stage, and to perform adequate lymphadenectomy than low-volume and community CoC hospitals (p ≤ 0.001). Hospital volume and type, however, were not associated with receipt of adjuvant multimodality therapy. These associations persisted in our multivariable analyses to show that CoC hospital attributes were associated with adequate lymphadenectomy, but marginally predictive of receipt of adjuvant multimodality therapy.

Conclusions

The strong association between CoC hospital volume or type and guideline-recommended care diminishes after gastric cancer surgery. Variations in referral, insurance, and documentation patterns are potential explanations for these findings. These results highlight some limitations of using hospital attributes as a sole predictor of optimal cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL. Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(3):454–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA. 2000;284(23):3028–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Schrag D, et al. Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(8):649–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):777–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Refaie WB, Gay G, Virnig BA, et al. Variations in gastric cancer care: a trend beyond racial disparities. Cancer. 2010;116(2):465–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Sener SF, et al. Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):510–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Wayne JD, et al. Effect of hospital type and volume on lymph node evaluation for gastric and pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg. 2008;143(7):671–8; discussion 8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raval MV, Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, et al. Nodal evaluation in Wilms’ tumors: analysis of the national cancer data base. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Refaie WB, Tseng JF, Gay G, et al. The impact of ethnicity on the presentation and prognosis of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Results from the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2008;113(3):461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raval MV, Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS. Quality improvement for pancreatic cancer care: is regionalization a feasible and effective mechanism? Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010;19(2):371–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF, Jr., Correa P, Rosenberg PS, Rabkin CS. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in U.S. adults. JAMA. 2010;303(17):1723–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greene FL PD, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ajani JA, Barthel JS, Bekaii-Saab T, et al. Gastric cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8(4):378–409.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(10):725–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dudeja V, Habermann EB, Zhong W, et al. Guideline recommended gastric cancer care in the elderly: insights into the applicability of cancer trials to real world. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):26–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):426–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(1):166–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. Comparison of commission on cancer-approved and -nonapproved hospitals in the United States: implications for studies that use the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4177–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

DISCLOSURE

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waddah B. Al-Refaie MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudeja, V., Gay, G., Habermann, E.B. et al. Do Hospital Attributes Predict Guideline-Recommended Gastric Cancer Care in the United States?. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 365–372 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1973-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1973-z

Keywords

Navigation