Abstract
Background
Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma with an enhanced propensity for local and systemic failure. The outcome of locally recurrent and metastatic AS treated at a single institution was evaluated.
Methods
Medical records of AS patients treated for local recurrence and distant metastasis (1993–2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify prognosticators.
Results
Forty-four patients were treated for locally recurrent AS; the majority (59%) were ≤5 cm; the most common sites were skin (48%) and breast (32%). Thirty-two patients (73%) had surgery; 73% received chemotherapy; radiation was delivered to 41%. Median disease-specific survival (DSS) was 50 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 25.7–73.5 months]. Multivariable analysis identified size >5 cm as the only independent adverse prognosticator of recurrent AS-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR): 3.26, P = 0.04]. Ninety-nine patients were treated for metastatic AS; 73% had multiple metastatic sites; the lung was the most common site (36%). Chemotherapy, mainly doxorubicin- and/or paclitaxel-based regimens, were administered to 95 patients (96%). Radiotherapy was utilized in 25% cases; 16% of patients underwent curative-intent surgery. Median DSS was 10 months (95% CI: 7.9–12 months). Isolated lymph node metastasis versus hematogenic spread was the only statistically significant favorable prognostic factor identified (HR: 0.29, P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Locally recurrent AS is often treatable; complete resection can potentially prolong survival. In contrast, metastatic patients have a grave prognosis; however, patients with isolated lymphatic spread and possibly those treated with taxol-based chemotherapeutic regimens have a favorable outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Naka N, Ohsawa M, Tomita Y, et al. Prognostic factors in angiosarcoma: a multivariate analysis of 55 cases. J Surg Oncol. 1996;61:170–6.
Fayette J, Martin E, Piperno-Neumann S, et al. Angiosarcomas, a heterogeneous group of sarcomas with specific behavior depending on primary site: a retrospective study of 161 cases. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:2030–6.
Deyrup AT, McKenney JK, Tighiouart M, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Sporadic cutaneous angiosarcomas: a proposal for risk stratification based on 69 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:72–7.
Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Enzinger and Weiss. Soft tissue tumors, 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2008.
Devita VT, Rosenberg SA, S H. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2008.
Holland JF, Frei E. Cancer medicine, 8th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2009.
Fury MG, Antonescu CR, Van Zee KJ, Brennan MF, Maki RG. A 14-year retrospective review of angiosarcoma: clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes with surgery and chemotherapy. Cancer J. 2005;11:241–7.
Buschmann A, Lehnhardt M, Toman N, Preiler P, Slakdeh MS, Muehlberger T. Surgical treatment of angiosarcoma of the scalp: less is more. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:399–403.
Mark RJ, Poen JC, Tran LM, Juillard GF. Angiosarcoma. A report of 67 patients and a review of the literature. Cancer. 1996;77:2400–6.
Maddox JC, Evans HL. Angiosarcoma of skin and soft tissue: a study of forty-four cases. Cancer. 1981;48:1907–21.
Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatment. Cancer. 1987;59:1046–57.
Lydiatt WM, Shaha AR, Shah JP. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1994;168:451–4.
Naka N, Ohsawa M, Tomita Y, Kanno H, Uchida A, Aozasa K. Angiosarcoma in Japan. A review of 99 cases. Cancer. 1995;75:989–96.
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:448–57.
Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163–70.
Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with Splus, 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 1999.
Espat NJ, Lewis JJ, Woodruff JM, et al. Confirmed angiosarcoma: prognostic factors and outcome in 50 prospectively followed patients. Sarcoma. 2000;4:173–7.
Morgan MB, Swann M, Somach S, Eng W, Smoller B. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a case series with prognostic correlation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:867–74.
Torres MA, Ballo MT, Butler CE, et al. Management of locally recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma after prior surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1124–9.
Lahat G, Tuvin D, Wei C, et al. New perspectives for staging and prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2739–48.
Pawlik TM, Paulino AF, McGinn CJ, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp: a multidisciplinary approach. Cancer. 2003;98:1716–26.
Fong Y, Coit DG, Woodruff JM, Brennan MF. Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients. Ann Surg. 1993;217:72–77.
Sher T, Hennessy BT, Valero V, et al. Primary angiosarcomas of the breast. Cancer. 2007;110:173–8.
Blazer DG, 3rd, Sabel MS, Sondak VK. Is there a role for sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of sarcoma? Surg Oncol. 2003;12:201–6.
Riad S, Griffin AM, Liberman B, et al. Lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:129–34.
Billingsley KG, Burt ME, Jara E, et al. Pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of patterns of diseases and postmetastasis survival. Ann Surg. 1999;229:602–12.
Casson AG, Putnam JB, Natarajan G, et al. Five-year survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 1992;69:662–8.
Penel N, Bui BN, Bay JO, et al. Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel for unresectable angiosarcoma: the ANGIOTAX Study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5269–74.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lahat, G., Dhuka, A.R., Lahat, S. et al. Outcome of Locally Recurrent and Metastatic Angiosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2502–2509 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0569-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0569-3