Skip to main content
Log in

ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System Guidance: Understanding Its Impact on Pharmaceutical Quality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
The AAPS Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) “Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems” (ICH Q10) guidance was introduced to address the growing gap between current good manufacturing practices and pharmaceutical manufacturing quality systems. This study evaluated the impact of the ICH Q10 guidance on the PQS of pharmaceutical manufacturers. Data were obtained from the enabler questionnaire from pharmaceutical manufacturers surveyed by the St. Gallen OPEX Benchmarking Program. These results represent the degree of implementation for enabler-focused questions based on a 5-point Likert scale self-assessment. Data analysis included a comparison of means and medians before and after the release of the ICH Q10 guidance and annual changes. There was a statistically significant difference for enabler implementation as a whole (p value < 0.0000), before and after the release of ICH Q10. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed for four of the five enabler categories (p values <0.05). In particular, the EMS enabler category showed a decrease in mean enabler score, suggesting the Management Responsibilities ICH Q10 PQS element was not effectively described or implemented. These results indicate that the release of ICH Q10 had a positive impact on the PQSs of pharmaceutical manufacturers. This was driven primarily by the changes observed in the TQM and JIT enabler categories and complimented by the TPM and BE categories. This would suggest that the Management Review, Change Management System, and Process Performance and Product Quality Monitoring System ICH Q10 PQS elements were all effectively described and implemented.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S Food and Drug Administration. Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century - A Risk-Based Approach Final Report. In: Services DoHaH, editor. September 27, 2004

  2. Damron C. FDA 483 Observations and Warning Letter Trends: Crowell & Moring; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). Quality System (QS) Regulation/Medical Device Good Manufacturing Practices2018 02/06/21. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/postmarket-requirements-devices/quality-system-qs-regulationmedical-device-good-manufacturing-practices.

  4. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Q8 PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT. 2009

  5. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, editor. 2006

  6. International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Q10 PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM. 2008

  7. Friedli T, Koehler S, Buess P, Basu P, Calnan N. FDA Quality Metrics Research Final Report Year 1 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. García-Bernal J, Ramírez-Alesón M. Why and How TQM Leads to Performance Improvements. Qual Manag J. 2015;22(3):23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng TC, Podolsky S. Just-in-Time Manufacturing: An introduction: Springer Netherlands. 1996

  10. Friedli T, Koehler S, Buess P, Eich S, Basu P, Calnan N. FDA Quality Metrics Research Final Report Year 2 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friedli T, Basu P, Bellm D, Werani J, editors. Leading Pharmaceutical Operational Excellence. 1 ed: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2013

  12. Vorne. TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) 2019. Available from: https://www.leanproduction.com/tpm.html

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Thomas Friedli and his co-workers at the University of St. Gallen, Institute of Technology Management, for giving access to the OPEX benchmarking survey results.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sean VanDuyse: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft—visualization. Michael Fulford: methodology, writing—review and editing. Michael Bartlett: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Bartlett.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 101 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

VanDuyse, S.A., Fulford, M.J. & Bartlett, M.G. ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System Guidance: Understanding Its Impact on Pharmaceutical Quality. AAPS J 23, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00657-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00657-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation