Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a field theoretic understanding of NN → NNπ

  • Nuclear Structure and Reactions
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We study the production amplitude for the reaction NNNNπ up to next-to-leading order in chiral perturbation theory using a counting scheme that takes into account the large scale introduced by the initial momentum. In particular, we investigate a subtlety that arises once the leading loop contributions are convoluted with the NN wave functions as demanded by the non-perturbative nature of the NN interaction. We show how to properly identify the irreducible contribution of loop diagrams in such type of reaction. The net effect of the inclusion of all next-to-leading-order loops is to enhance the leading rescattering amplitude by a factor of 4/3, bringing its contribution to the cross-section for ppdπ+ close to the experimental value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Koltun, A. Reitan, Phys. Rev. 141, 1413 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G.A. Miller, P. Sauer, Phys. Rev. C 44, 1725 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T.-S.H. Lee, D. Riska, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2237 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Hernández, E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 350, 158 (1995) (arXiv:nucl-th/9503019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Hanhart, Phys. Lett. B 358, 21 (1995) (arXiv:nucl-th/9508005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M.T. Peña, D.O. Riska, A. Stadler, Phys. Rev. C 60, 045201 (1999) (arXiv:nucl-th/9902066).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. U. van Kolck, G.A. Miller, D.O. Riska, Phys. Lett. B 388, 679 (1996) (arXiv:nucl-th/9607026).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Hanhart, Phys. Rep. 397, 155 (2004) (arXiv:hep-ph/0311341).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 295, 114 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B.Y. Park, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1519 (1996) (arXiv:nucl-th/9512023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Hanhart, J. Haidenbauer, M. Hoffmann, U.-G. Meißner, J. Speth, Phys. Lett. B 424, 8 (1998) (arXiv:nucl-th/9707029).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T.D. Cohen, J.L. Friar, G.A. Miller, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2661 (1996) (arXiv:nucl-th/9512036).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. da Rocha, G. Miller, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034613 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-th/9904031).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Dmitrašinović, K. Kubodera, F. Myhrer, T. Sato, Phys. Lett. B 465, 43 (1999) (arXiv:nucl-th/9902048).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. S.I. Ando, T.S. Park, D.P. Min, Phys. Lett. B 509, 253 (2001) (arXiv:nucl-th/0003004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Hanhart, G.A. Miller, F. Myhrer, T. Sato, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 63, 044002 (2001) (arXiv:nucl-th/0010079).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Motzke, C. Elster, C. Hanhart, Phys. Rev. C 66, 054002 (2002) (arXiv:nucl-th/0207047)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 4, 259 (1999) (arXiv:nucl-th/9806013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hanhart, U. van Kolck, G. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2905 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-th/0004033).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Hanhart, N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 66, 054005 (2002) (arXiv:nucl-th/0208050).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Gårdestig, talk presented at the ECT* workshop Charge Symmetry Breaking, Other Isospin Violations, Trento, June 2005

  22. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. B 251, 288 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Ordóñez, L. Ray, U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1982 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Epelbaum, W. Glöckle, U.-G. Meißner, Nucl. Phys. A 637, 107 (1998) (arXiv:nucl-th/9801064).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J.A. Niskanen, Phys. Rev. C 53, 526 (1996) (arXiv:nucl-th/9502015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Hanhart, J. Haidenbauer, O. Krehl, J. Speth, Phys. Lett. B 444, 25 (1998) (arXiv:nucl-th/9808020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. P.N. Deepak, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Phys. Rev. C 72, 024004 (2005) (arXiv:hep-ph/0503228).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. V. Baru, C. Hanhart, A.E. Kudryavtsev, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 589, 118 (2004) (arXiv:nucl-th/0402027).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. V. Lensky, V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, A.E. Kudryavtsev, U.-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 107 (2005) (arXiv:nucl-th/0505039).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Haag, Phys. Rev. 112, 669 (1958).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. H. Lehmann, K. Symanzik, W. Zimmermann, Nuovo Cimento 1, 205 (1955).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. N. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. C 62, 024001 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-th/9912054).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. D.A. Hutcheon, Nucl. Phys. A 535, 618 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. V.E. Tarasov, V.V. Baru, A.E. Kudryavtsev, Phys. At. Nucl. 63, 801 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001) (arXiv:nucl-th/0407003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. C.J. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2920 (1993).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Heimberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1012 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Drochner, Nucl. Phys. A 643, 55 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. H. Machner, J. Niskanen, arXiv:nucl-ex/0511027.

  40. I.S. Gerstein, R. Jackiw, B.W. Lee, S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2486 (1971).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 309, 421 (1993) (arXiv:hep-ph/9304275).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. H.O. Meyer, Phys. Rev. C 65, 027601 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  43. W.W. Daehnick, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024003 (2002) (arXiv:nucl-ex/0108021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. B. von Przewoski, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064604 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-ex/9912008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. M. Daum, Eur. Phys. J. C 23, 43 (2002) (arXiv:nucl-ex/0108008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. C. Hanhart, J. Haidenbauer, O. Krehl, J. Speth, Phys. Rev. C 61, 064008 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-th/0002025).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. A.K. Opper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 212302 (2003) (arXiv:nucl-ex/0306027).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. E.J. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 142302 (2003) (arXiv:nucl-ex/0305032).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. U. van Kolck, J.A. Niskanen, G.A. Miller, Phys. Lett. B 493, 65 (2000) (arXiv:nucl-th/0006042).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. A. Gårdestig, Phys. Rev. C 69, 044606 (2004) (arXiv:nucl-th/0402021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4, 193 (1995) (arXiv:hep-ph/9501384).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. E. Epelbaum, to be published in Prog. Nucl. Part. Phys., arXiv:nucl-th/0509032.

  53. E. Epelbaum, A. Nogga, W. Glöckle, H. Kamada, U.-G. Meißner, H. Witala, Phys. Rev. C 66, 064001 (2002) (arXiv:nucl-th/0208023).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Hanhart.

Additional information

Th. Walcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lensky, V., Baru, V., Haidenbauer, J. et al. Towards a field theoretic understanding of NN → NNπ. Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 37–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10002-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10002-4

PACS.

Navigation