Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Approaches to Implementing Ecosystem Climate Projects in Russia

  • CLIMATE POLICY IN RUSSIA: DECARBONIZATION WITH NATURE BASED SOLUTIONS
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russia is developing a national legal and regulatory framework for implementing the Paris Agreement. In Russian strategic documents, there is an inconsistency in measures and quantitative indicators to reduce emissions and increase absorption of greenhouse gases, and the main stake on forest and other ecosystems through the implementation of climate projects raises questions. The objective of this work is to determine the purpose and place of climate projects within the framework of the national low-carbon policy, as well as to analyze the possibilities and limitations of their implementation in Russia. The main criteria for climate projects are the principle of additionality, conservatism in determining the baseline, and minimization of risks (leakage, volatility, termination of project financing, reversions). Ecosystem projects are high-risk compared to projects in the industrial sectors of the economy, while the climate component of project activity arises only with long-term preservation of the result. The goal of climate projects in Russia should be to develop mitigation technologies based on sustainable management of natural ecosystems: the results should be characterized by multiple benefits in the field of ecosystem services of the territory, biodiversity and adaptation to climate change, which increases their attractiveness when implementing the policy of sustainable development of companies and the state. Given their additional nature, the projects will not be able to provide a significant quantitative contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but may provide a tool to achieve these goals. At the initial stage of the formation of the Russian carbon market, only reliable and transparent projects should be allowed to be implemented (reforestation and afforestation with mixed species; improved forest management of managed forests; management of previously unmanaged forests; restoration of wetlands/grass ecosystems; conservation of soil carbon of agricultural lands; biochar application to soils). Projects such as the preservation of forests from logging and the creation of monoculture plantations require the development of a separate regulatory framework to prevent falsification and minimize the threat to local natural ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Net emissions (or net absorption) is the balance between emissions and absorption of greenhouse gases in a certain area.

  2. Prevention of climate change, mitigation of anthropogenic impact on climate.

  3. https://nauka.tass.ru/nauka/14669871; https://chechnyatoday.com/news/348781.

REFERENCES

  1. Belyaev, V.I., Varlagin, A.V., Dridiger, V.K., Kurganova, I.N., Orlova, L.V., Orlov, S.V., Popov, A.I., Romanovskaya, A.A., Toigil’din, A.L., Trots, N.M., Fomin, A.A., and Khomyakov, D.M., The global climate agenda. Soil conservation resource-saving (carbon) agriculture as a standard of international and national strategies for soil conservation and agricultural carbon markets, Int. Agric. J., 2022, vol. 65, pt. 1, no. 1, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740-2022-6-1-26

  2. da Cunha, T.Q.G., Santos, A.C., Novaes, E., Hansted, A.L.S., Yamaji, F.M., and Sette, C.R., Jr., Eucalyptus expansion in Brazil: Energy yield in new forest frontiers, Biomass Bioenergy, 2021, vol. 144, p. 105900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Barros, Ferraz S.F., Rodrigues, C.B., Garcia, L.G., Alvares, C.A., and de Paula Lima, W., Effects of eucalyptus plantations on streamflow in Brazil: Moving beyond the water use debate, Forest Ecol. Manage., 2019, vol. 453, p. 117571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fomenko, G.A., Romanovskaya, A.A., Fomenko, M.A., Loshadkin, K.A., Klimov, E.V., Lipka, O.N., Korotkov, V.N., and Aldoshina, A.S., Forest climate projects: Opportunities and challenges for implementing the ESG approach. Pt. 1, Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2022a, no. 2, pp. 91–106. https://doi.org/10.24412/1728-323X-2022-2-91-106

  5. Fomenko, G.A., Romanovskaya, A.A., Fomenko, M.A., Loshadkin, K.A., Klimov, E.V., Lipka, O.N., Korotkov, V.N., and Aldoshina, A.S., Forest climate projects: Opportunities and challenges for implementing the ESG approach. Pt. 2, Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2022b, no. 3, pp. 65–74. https://doi.org/10.24412/1728-323X-2022-3-65-74

  6. Griscom, B.W., Lomax, G., Kroeger, T., and Ellis, P.W., We need both natural and energy solutions to stabilize our climate, Global Change Biol., 2019, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1889–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14612

  8. Guo, M., The 3R principles for applying biochar to improve soil health, Soil Syst., 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010009

  10. IPCC, 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, Eagleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., and Tanabe, K., Eds., Tokyo: IGES, 2006. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  11. IPCC, Global warming of 1.5°C, IPCC Special Report, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940

  13. IPCC, Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022a.

    Google Scholar 

  14. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

  15. IPCC, Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022b.

    Google Scholar 

  16. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926

  17. Leskinen, P., Lindner, M., Verkerk, P.I., Nabuurs, G.Ya., Van Brusselen, I., Kulikova, E., Khassegava, M., and Lerink, B., Lesa Rossii i izmenenie klimata. Chto nam mozhet skazat’ nauka 11 (Forests of Russia and Climate Change: What Science Can Tell Us 11), Joensuu, Finland: Eur. For. Inst., 2020.

  18. https://doi.org/10.36333/wsctu11

  19. Li, X.-W. and Miao, H.-Z., How to incorporate blue carbon into the China certified emission reductions scheme: Legal and policy perspectives, Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, p. 10567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710567

  21. Matveev, S.M., Vodolazhskii, A.N., and Mironenko, A.V., Approaches and proposals to the definition and implementation of the allowable cutting area in the Russian Federation, Lesotekh. Zh., 2019, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  22. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2019.3/7

  23. Natsional’nyi doklad “Global’nyi klimat i pochvennyi pokrov Rossii: opustynivanie i degradatsiya zemel’, institutsional’nye, infrastrukturnye, tekhnologicheskie mery adaptatsii (sel’skoe i lesnoe khozyaistvo)” (National Report “Global Climate and Soil Cover in Russia: Desertification and Land Degradation, Institutional, Infrastructural, Technological Adaptation Measures (Agriculture and Forestry)”), Edel’geriev, R.S.-Kh., Ed., Moscow: MBA, 2019, vol. 2. https://cc.voeikovmgo.ru/images/sobytiya/2020/03/docclipoch.pdf.

  24. Natsional’nyi doklad o kadastre antropogennykh vybrosov iz istochnikov i absorbtsii poglotitelyami parnikovykh gazov, ne reguliruemykh Monreal’skim protokolom, za 1990–2020 gg. (National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions from Sources and Removals by Greenhouse Gas Sinks Not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020), Moscow: Rosgidromet, 2022, vol. 1. https://unfccc.int/documents/461970.

  25. Romanovskaya, A.A., Korotkov, V.N., Polumieva, P.D., Trunov, A.A., Vertyankina, V.Yu., and Karaban, R.T., Greenhouse gas fluxes and mitigation potential for managed lands in the Russian federation, Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change, 2020, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 661–687.

  26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09885-2

  27. Shvarts, E.A. and Ptichnikov, A.V Strategy of low-carbon development of Russia and the role of forests in its implementation, Nauchn. Tr. Vol’nogo Ekon. O-va Ross., 2022, vol. 236, no. 4, pp. 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  28. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-236-4-399-426

  29. Vaganov, E.A., Porfir’ev, B.N., Shirov, A.A., Kolpakov, A.Yu., and Pyzhev, A.I., Evaluation of the contribution of Russian forests to the reduction of climate change, Ekon. Reg., 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1096–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  30. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yzrael Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, 107258, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Romanovskaya

Authors
  1. A. A. Romanovskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Romanovskaya.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romanovskaya, A.A. Approaches to Implementing Ecosystem Climate Projects in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 13, 609–621 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700922

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700922

Keywords:

Search

Navigation